In all probability, the plastic clays have been derived from a somewhat greater variety of minerals than the primary clays ([p. 71]) and under conditions of decomposition which differ in details, though broadly of the same nature as those producing china clays. The presence of colloidal matter suggests a more vigorous action—or even a precipitation from solution—instead of the slower reactions which result in the formation of the kaolinite crystals.
The much smaller particles present in plastic clays also indicate a more complete grinding during the transportation of the material or some form of precipitation. If, as Hickling suggests, all clays are direct products of the decomposition of mica, the fact that several varieties of mica are known and that the conditions under which these decompose must vary considerably, afford a good, if incomplete, explanation of some of the widely diverse characteristics observed in different clays.
Notwithstanding the great complexities of the whole subject and the apparently contradictory evidence concerning some clays, there is a wide-spread feeling that whatever may be the mineral from which a given clay has been derived, the true clay substance, which is its essential constituent, would (if it could be isolated in a pure state) prove to be of the same composition as kaolinite obtainable from china clay of exceptional purity. The purest clay substances (pelinite) yet obtained from some of the most plastic clays are, however, so impure as to make any detailed investigation of their composition by present methods abortive. The methods of synthesis which have proved so successful in organic chemistry have hitherto yielded few intelligible results with clays, on account of the complexity of the accessory reactions which occur.
The Difference between Pure Clay Substance and Ordinary Clays.
The properties and characteristics of true clay are very seriously modified by other materials which may be associated with it. This may be perceived by comparing the properties of clays mentioned in [Chapter I] with those of various forms of true clay just given. Moreover, as true clay never occurs in a perfectly pure state in nature, the properties of clays must be largely dependent on the accessory ingredients.
Silica, for example, when alone is a highly refractory material, but in the presence of true clay it reduces the refractoriness of the latter. Lime has a similar effect though its chemical action on the clay is entirely different. A very small proportion of some substances—notably the oxides of sodium and potassium—will greatly alter the behaviour of true clay when heated and will produce an impervious mass in place of a porous one.
For these reasons, it is necessary in studying clays to pay attention to both their physical and chemical properties and to separate the material into fractions so that each of these may be studied separately and their individual as well as their collective characteristics ascertained. Failure to do this has been the cause of much obscurity and confusion in investigations on certain clays composed of a considerable proportion of non-argillaceous material which ought to have been separated before any attempt was made to study the true clay present.
There is, therefore, a considerable difference between a natural clay and the pure clay substance theoretically obtainable from it; this difference being most marked in the case of low-grade brick clays of glacial origin, which may contain 50 per cent. or more of adventitious materials. If used in a natural state they would be found to be valueless on account of their impurities giving them characteristics of a highly undesirable character, whereas the true clay in them is found—in so far as it can be separated—to bear a close resemblance to that obtained from a high grade, plastic, pottery clay. Unfortunately, it is, at present, impossible to isolate this clay substance in anything approaching a pure form, and many clays are without commercial value because of comparatively small proportions of impurities which cannot be separated from the clay substance without destroying the latter.
Classification of Clays.
Owing to the widely differing substances from which clays can, apparently, be formed and the peculiar difficulties which are experienced in investigating the nature of clay substance from different sources, it is by no means easy to devise a scheme of classification of clays, though many of these have been attempted by different scientists.