Table 27—Results of Bacteriological Analyses of Samples of Water at Peekskill, N. Y., Before and After Filtration.
Bacteria per cubic centimeter.
Date.Raw water.Clear reservoir.Effluent No. 1.Effluent No. 2.Effluent No. 3.Effluent No. 4.Tap in city.
1909.
December 29th190100...............
1910.
February 15th13510103020...265
March 31st22550254560...35
May 18th300292226354336
July 6th3004493411031
August 16th6050411315
October 3d55014121438......
November 21st3152226176......
1911.
January 25th4157846...7
Average277301416262265
Table 27—(Continued.)
Filter Sand Tests for B. Coli.
Quantity of water tested.Percentage of Samples Containing B. Coli.
Raw.Filtered.
0.1 cu. cm.00
1.0 cu. cm.200
10.0 cu. cm.400

As a matter of record, the results of a series of analyses made at Peekskill, N. Y., during 1910 are presented in [Table 27]. A sand filter was constructed for the water supply of this city in 1909, and put in operation in December. The filter has a capacity of 4,000,000 gal. per day. The supply is taken from Peekskill Creek, and the water receives about one week's nominal storage before flowing to the filters. An aerator is used before filtration during the summer, when algae are likely to develop in the reservoir. The filter was installed after an epidemic of typhoid which was apparently caused by an infection of the water supply. Normally, the water has been little contaminated, but the supply is subject to accidental contamination at any time, among other possible sources of infection being the camps of workmen now engaged in constructing the Catskill Aqueduct for New York City.

Table 28—Average Results of Chemical Analysis at Peekskill, N. Y., Made at Intervals of Six Weeks During 1910.
Parts per Million. Parts per Million.
Raw water.Filtered water.Raw water.Filtered water.
Turbidity2.0000.000Total residue70.0076.00
Color25.00020.000Loss on ignition19.0017.00
Nitrogen as albuminoid amonia0.1120.076Fixed residue50.0059.00
Nitrogen as free ammonia0.0240.006Iron0.170.13
Nitrogen as nitrites0.0010.001Total hardness38.7045.10
Nitrogen as nitrates0.0600.060Alkalinity33.9042.60
Incrustants4.6004.500Chlorine2.602.70

F. F. Longley, Assoc. M. Am. Soc. C. E. (by letter).—In this paper the author has presented a mass of data which will be welcomed by engineers engaged in water purification work, because complete operating records form a substantial basis for improvement in the art, and are often the inspiration for interesting discussions and the exchange of experiences of different observers whose views are mutually appreciated.

Recent tendencies in filtration engineering have been largely in the direction of reducing the cost of operation. A comparison of the operating costs of the earlier American plants of about a decade ago, with those here presented of the Washington plant, is very gratifying to those who have been intimately connected with the latter work. Through perfection in design and reasonable care in operation, the cost of filter cleaning, which is a very considerable part of the total cost, has been reduced to an unusually low figure, without any sacrifice in efficiency, and in the interests of the public health.

[Table 14] shows that, from the first year, there has been a progressive increase in the total cost of operation per million gallons filtered, but this has not meant an increase in the annual total expenditure. The largest percentage of increase in any item has been in "Care of Grounds and Parking," and covers much‑desired landscape improvements. Aside from this, the principal factor affecting the table of costs has been the reduction in water consumption in the District of Columbia. Nothing pertaining to this reduction has produced any corresponding reduction in the force required for the maintenance and operation of the filtration plant, office and laboratory, and pumping station, though probably there has been some reduction in filter cleaning. Obviously, then, the total cost per million gallons would increase.

This decrease in consumption has been brought about by the elimination of waste in the distribution system, which is not in the same department as the filtration plant, but with regard to which a word may not be amiss in connection with this discussion.

The Washington Aqueduct was built half a century ago on lines which at that time were considered extraordinarily generous. Until recently, therefore, there has been no occasion for concern over the high rate of consumption. During recent years, however, the use and waste of water have increased, reaching a climax under unusual conditions in the winter of 1904‑05. The maximum capacity of the aqueduct system is about 90,000,000 gal. The maximum daily consumption at the time mentioned arose almost to 100,000,000 gal., with the result that, before normal conditions were restored, the reservoirs of the system were almost depleted.

This had a beneficial effect, as provision was made for an active campaign for reducing the waste of water, which was known to be very large. These investigations, using the pitometer, were begun in July, 1906, and have been pursued continuously since that time, with most excellent results. Up to January, 1909, leaks aggregating about 12,000,000 gal. per day were detected and eliminated, and about half the house services had still to be covered by the pitometer bureau.