The general effect of temperature changes on the rapidity of removal of the sediment and its consequent concentration in the sand layer, however, seems plainly evident.

In corroboration of the third point mentioned in the theoretical consideration of turbidity removal in the filters, the daily turbidities of the filtered water have been classified and summarized for different turbidities in the applied water, and also for different temperatures. The average turbidities thus obtained are given in [Table 31].

Table 31—Turbidity in Filtered Water at Different Temperatures Produced by Given Turbidity in Applied Water.
Turbidity of applied water.Temperature, in Degrees, Fahrenheit.
40°40°‑50°50°‑60°60°‑70°70°
201.81.31.21.51.7
20-404.85.03.53.02.6
40-607.96.95.4...3.7
60-8010.77.7......5.4
80-10011.3............
100............12.0[1]

[1 For an average turbidity = 150. approximately.]

The influence of the temperature of the water on the turbidity of the effluent is very pronounced. For a temperature of less than 40° Fahr. (actual average temperature about 35°), the turbidity of the filtered water for a given turbidity of the applied water is practically twice as great as for a temperature greater than 70° (actual average temperature about 75°). This fact fits in very nicely with the influence of temperature on sedimentation. Referring again to this temperature relation, as set forth on a previous page, the hydraulic subsiding value of a particle in water, of a size so small that viscosity is the controlling factor in its downward velocity, is approximately twice as great at 75° as at 35 degrees. We would then expect to find that, in order to obtain a given turbidity in the filtered water, a raw water may be applied at 75°, having twice the turbidity of the water applied at 35°, to produce the same turbidity; and further, as the turbidity of the filtered water, for a given temperature condition, varies quite directly in proportion to the turbidity in the applied water, it follows that an applied water of given turbidity will produce an effluent at 35° with a turbidity twice as great as at 75 degrees. This is quite in accordance with the facts obtained in actual operation, as indicated on the diagram, [Figure 15].

Preliminary Treatment of the Water.—The most striking features of the bacterial results given in [Table 4] are, first, the uniformly low numbers of bacteria in the filtered water during perhaps 8 or 9 months of the year, and the increase in numbers each winter. This is shown clearly in the analysis of bacterial counts in [Table 32].

Table 32—Classification of Daily Bacterial Counts in the Filtered-Water Reservoir During the Period, November 1st, 1905, to February 1st, 1908.
Bacterial count between:No. of days.Percentage of whole.
0 and 20 per cu. cm.29141.0
20 and 40 per cu. cm.24534.6
40 and 60 per cu. cm.638.9
60 and 80 per cu. cm.304.2
80 and 100 per cu. cm.284.092.7
100 and 200 per cu. cm.294.1
200 and 300 per cu. cm.131.8
300 and 500 per cu. cm.50.7
500 and 1000 per cu. cm.50.77.3
Total100.0

The tests for Bacillus Coli in [Table 5] show results which correspond closely to these, with this organism detected only infrequently, except during the periods of high bacteria, and both of these are parallel to the turbidity variations in the filtered water. These variations follow closely the variations in the turbidity and in the bacterial content of the water applied to the filters.

By all standards of excellence, the sanitary quality of the water during the greater part of the time is beyond criticism. In view of the close parallelism of turbidity and bacterial results in the applied and in the filtered water, it is entirely logical to conclude that, if the quality of the applied water could be maintained continually through the winter as good as, or better than, it is during the summer, then the filtered water would be of the perfect sanitary quality desired throughout the entire year.

This was all foreseen ten years ago, when Messrs. Hering, Fuller, and Hazen recommended auxiliary works for preliminary treatment of the supply, although, as the author states, these works were not provided for in the original construction. As prejudice against the use of a coagulant seemed to be at the bottom of the opposition to the preliminary treatment, a campaign of education bearing on this point was instituted, in addition to the systematic studies of different preliminary methods to which the author refers. As a result of the combined efforts of all those interested in promoting this improvement, an appropriation was finally made for the work in 1910. The coagulating plant has since been built, and the writer is informed that coagulation was tried on a working scale a short time ago during a period of high turbidity. A statement of the results of this treatment on the purification of the water in the reservoir system and in the filter plant would be of great interest.