[1258] Gruel, Chronique de Richemont, pp. 71-72. I have here followed Gruel, who is not generally very trustworthy, but whose account in this particular seems probable, at least he is no mere hagiographer.
[1259] Ibid., p. 228.
[1260] Ibid., p. 72. E. Cosneau, Le connétable de Richemont, p. 170.
[1261] Journal du siège, p. 97. Chronique de la Pucelle, p. 301.
[1262] A. de Villaret, Campagne des Anglais, pp. 87-88, and proofs and illustrations, pp. 153, 158.
[1263] Chronique de la Pucelle, p. 305. Journal du siège, p. 102. Jean Chartier, Chronique, vol. i, p. 84. Wavrin du Forestel, Anciennes chroniques, vol. i, pp. 279, 282. Monstrelet, vol. iii, pp. 325 et seq.
[1264] Gruel, Chronique de Richemont, p. 72.
[1265] Wavrin du Forestel, Anciennes chroniques, vol. i, p. 279.
[1266] Trial, vol. iii, p. 98.
[1267] Wavrin du Forestel, Anciennes chroniques, ed. Dupont, vol. i, p. 281. Berry, in Trial, vol. iv, p. 44. Jean Chartier, Chronique, vol. i, p. 85. Journal du siège, pp. 102, 103. Chronique de la Pucelle, p. 306. Gruel, Chronique de Richemont, p. 72. Falconbridge, in Trial, vol. iv, p. 452. Morosini, vol. iii, pp. 71-73.