2. Let every believer, who longs to be holy, join in the daily prayer that God would visit His people with a great outpouring of the Spirit of Holiness. Pray without ceasing that every believer may live as a holy one.
3. ‘Seeing that ye look for these things.’ Our life depends, in more than one sense, upon what we look at. ‘We look not at the things which are seen.’ It is only as we look at the Invisible and Spiritual, and come under its power, that we shall be what we ought to be in all holy living and godliness.
4. Holy in Christ. Let this be our parting word. However strong the branch becomes, however far away it reaches round the home, out of sight [p280] of the vine, all its beauty and all its fruitfulness ever depend upon that one point of contact where it grows out of the vine. So be it with us too. All the outer circumference of my life has its centre in the ego—the living, conscious I myself, in which my being roots. And this I is rooted in Christ. Down in the depths of my inner life, there is Christ holding, bearing, guiding, quickening me into holiness and fruitfulness. In Him I am, In Him I will abide. His will and commands will I keep; His Love and Power will I trust. And I will daily seek to praise God that I am Holy in Christ.
[p281]
NOTES.
[Contents]
[NOTE A.]
Holiness as Proprietorship.
In a little book—Holiness, as understood by the Writers of the Bible; A Bible Study by Joseph Agar Beet—the thought that by Holiness is meant our relation to God, and the claim He has upon us, has been very carefully worked out. Holy ground was such because ‘it stood in special relation to Himself.’ The first-born ‘were to stand in a special relation to God as His property.’ So with the entire nation; when God declares that they shall be holy, He means ‘that they shall render to Him the devotion He requires.’ ‘All holy objects stand in a special relation to God as His property.’ The priests are said to sanctify themselves; they did this ‘by formally placing themselves at God’s disposal, or by separating themselves from whatever was inconsistent with the service of God.’ ‘When God declares He is holy, the word must represent the same idea in the hundreds of passages in which it is predicated of men and things.’ ‘Holiness is God’s claim to the ownership of men and things; and the objects claimed were called holy. Now, God’s claim was a new and wondrous revelation of His nature. To Aaron God was now the Great Being who had claimed from him a lifelong and exclusive service. This claim was a new era, not only in his everyday life, but in his conception of God. Consequently the word holy, which expressed Aaron’s relation to God, was suitably used to express [p282] God’s relation to Aaron. In other words, to Aaron and Israel God was holy in the sense that He claimed the exclusive ownership of the entire nation. When men yielded to God the devotion He claimed, they were said to sanctify God.’ ‘Jehovah and Israel stood in special relation to each other; therefore Jehovah was the Holy One of Israel, and Israel was Holy to Jehovah. This mutual relation rested upon God’s claim that Israel should specially be His; and this claim implied that in a special manner He would belong to Israel. This claim was a manifestation of the nature of God.’ ‘The peculiar relation arises from God’s own claim, in consequence of which they stand in a new and solemn relation to Him. This may be called objective holiness. This is the most common sense of the word. In this sense God sanctified these objects for Himself. But since some of these objects were intelligent beings, and the others were in control of such, the word sanctify denotes these ones’ formal surrender of themselves and their possessions to God. This may be called subjective holiness. From the word holy predicated of God, we learn that God’s claim was not merely occasional, but an outflow of His Essence. As the one Being who claims unlimited and absolute ownership and supreme devotion, God is the Holy One.’
In the New Testament the Spirit of God claims the epithet holy ‘as being in a very special manner the source and influence of which God is the one and only aim.’ Here ‘our conception of the holiness of God increases with our increasing perception of the greatness of His claim upon us, and that this claim springs from the very essence of God. In the incarnate Son of God we see the full development and realization of the Biblical idea of holiness. We find Him standing in a special relation to God, and living a life of which the one and only aim is to advance the purposes of God.’ We see in Him ‘holiness in its highest degree, i.e. the highest conceivable devotion to God and to the advancement of His kingdom.’ ‘In virtue of His intelligent, hearty, continued appropriation [p283] of the Father’s purpose, and in virtue of its realization in all the details of the Saviour’s life, He was called the Holy One of God.’
‘The word saint is very appropriate as a designation of the followers of Christ; for it declares what God requires them to be. By calling His people saints, God declares His will that we live a life of which He is the one and only aim. This is the objective holiness of the Church of Christ. In some passages holiness is set before the people of God as a standard for their attainment. In these passages holy denotes a realization in man of God’s purpose that he live a life of which God is the one and only aim. This is the subjective holiness of God’s people.