Страница - 1 Страница - 3

Contents

[Preface.]
[Chapter 1. Action.]
[Chapter II. The Springs Of Action.]
[Section I. The Appetites.]
[Section II. The Desires.]
[Section III. The Affections.]
[Chapter III. The Governing Principles Of Action.]
[Chapter IV. The Right.]
[Chapter V. Means And Sources Of Knowledge As To Right And Wrong.]
[Section I. Conscience.]
[Section II. Sources Of Knowledge. 1. Observation, Experience, And Tradition.]
[Section III. Sources Of Knowledge. 2. Law.]
[Section IV. Sources Of Knowledge. 3. Christianity.]
[Chapter VI. Rights And Obligations.]
[Chapter VII. Motive, Passion, And Habit.]
[Chapter VIII. Virtues, And The Virtues.]
[Chapter IX. Prudence; Or Duties To One's Self.]
[Section I. Self-Preservation.]
[Section II. The Attainment Of Knowledge.]
[Section III. Self-Control.]
[Section IV. Moral Self-Culture.]
[Chapter X. Justice; Or, Duties To One's Fellow-Beings.]
[Section I. Duties To God.]
[Section II. Duties Of The Family.]
[Section III. Veracity.]
[Section IV. Honesty.]
[Section V. Beneficence.]
[Chapter XI. Fortitude; Or Duties With Reference To Unavoidable Evils And Sufferings.]
[Section I. Patience.]
[Section II. Submission.]
[Section III. Courage.]
[Chapter XII. Order; Or Duties As To Objects Under One's Own Control.]
[Section I. Time.]
[Section II. Place.]
[Section III. Measure.]
[Section IV. Manners.]
[Section V. Government.]
[Chapter XIII. Casuistry.]
[Chapter XIV. Ancient History Of Moral Philosophy.]
[Chapter XV. Modern History Of Moral Philosophy.]
[Index.]
[Footnotes]

[pg iii]

Preface.

This book has been prepared, particularly, for the use of the Freshman Class in Harvard College. The author has, at the same time, desired to meet the need, felt in our high schools, of a manual of Moral Science fitted for the more advanced classes.

In the preparation of this treatise, the author has been at no pains to avoid saying what others had said before. Yet the book is original, so far as such a book can be or ought to be original. The author has directly copied nothing except Dugald Stewart's classification of the Desires. But as his reading for several years has been principally in the department of ethics, it is highly probable that much of what he supposes to be his own thought may have been derived from other minds. Of course, there is no small part of the contents of a work of this kind, which is the common property of writers, and must in some form reappear in every elementary manual.

Should this work be favorably received, the author hopes to prepare, for higher college-classes, a textbook, embracing a more detailed and thorough discussion of the questions at issue among the different schools—past and present—of ethical science.