COLONIES.
LOCATION.
B.C.
AUTHORITIES.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Ostea.
Labici.
Antium.
Auxur.
Minturnae.
Sinuessa.
Sena Gallica.
Castrum Novum.
Aesium.
Alsium.
Fregena.
Pyrgi.
Puteoli.
Volturnum.
Liturnum.
Salernum.
Buxentum.
Sipontum.
Tempsa.
Croton.
Potentia.
Pisaurum.
Parma.
Mutina.
Saturnia.
Graviscae.
Luna.
Auximum.
Fabrateria.
Minervia.
Neptunia.
Dertona.
Eporedia.
Narbo Martius.
Latium.
"
"
"
Campania.
"
Umbria.
Picenum.
Umbria.
Etruria.
"
"
Campania.
"
"
"
Lucania.
Apulia.
Bruttii.
"
Picenum.
Umbria.
Gallia Cis.
Gallia Cis.
Etruria.
"
"
Picenum.
Latium.
Bruttii.
Iapygia.
Liguria.
Gallia Trans.
Gallia Narbo.
418
418
338
329
296
296
283
283
247
247
245
191
194
194
194
194
194
194
194
194
184
184
183
183
183
181
180
157
124
122
122
100
100
118
Livy, 1, 33; Dionys., 3, 44; Polyb., 6, 29; Cic. de R.R., 2, 18, 33.
Livy, 4, 47, 7.
" 8, 14.
" 8, 21; 27, 38; Vell. 1, 14.
Livy, 10, 21.
" 10, 21; 27, 38.
" Epit., 11; Vell., 1, 14, 8.
Livy, Epit., 11; Vell., 1, 14, 8.
Vell., 1, 14, 8.
" 1, 14, 8; L. Epit., 19; L., 36, 3.
Livy, 36, 3.
" "
" 34, 45.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Livy, 34, 45.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Livy, 39, 44.
" " "
" " 55.
Livy, 39, 55.
" " "
" 40, 39.
" 41, 13.
Vell., 1, 15, 3.
" 1, 15, 4.
" 1, 15, 4; Appian B.C., 2, 23.
Id.
Vell., 1, 15, 5.
" " "
Mommsen.

CHAPTER [II.]

SEC. [5.]—LEX CASSIA.

Every year added to the difference between the patrician and plebeian, the rich and the poor; a difference which had now grown so great as to threaten seriously the very existence of the state. The most sagacious of all the plans which had been proposed to stop this evil, was that set forth by Spurius Cassius, a noble patrician now acting as consul for the third[l] time. In the year 268, he submitted to the burgesses[2] a proposal to have the public land surveyed, that portion belonging to the populus set aside and the remainder divided among the plebeians or leased for the benefit[3] of the public treasury.

He thus attempted to wrest from the senate the control of the public land and, with the aid of the Latini and the plebeians, to put an end to the system of occupation.[4] The lands which he proposed to divide were solely those which the state had acquired through conquest since the general assignment by king Servius, and which it still retained.[5] This was the first measure by which it was proposed to disturb the possessors in their peaceful occupation of the state lands, and, according to Livy, such a measure had never been proposed from then to the time in which he was writing, under Augustus, without exciting the greatest disturbance.[6] Cassius might well suppose that his personal distinction and the equity and wisdom of the measure would carry it through, even amidst the storm of opposition to which it was subjected. Like many other reformers equally well meaning, he was mistaken.

The citizens who occupied this land had grown rich by reason of its possessions. Some of them received it as an inheritance, and doubtless looked upon it as their property as much as the Ager Romanus. These to a man opposed the bill. The patricians arose en masse. The rich plebeians, the aristocracy of wealth, took part with them. Even the commons were dissatisfied because Spurius Cassius proposed in accordance with federal rights and equity to bestow a portion of the land upon the Latini and Hernici, their confederates and allies.[7] The bill proposed by Cassius, together with such provisions as were necessary, became a law, according to Niebuhr,[8] because the tribunes had no power to bring forward a law of any kind before the plebeian tribes obtained a voice in the legislature by the enactment of the Publilian law in 472 B.C.; so that when they afterwards made use of the agrarian law to excite the public passions it must have been one previously enacted but dishonestly set aside and, in Dionysius' account, this is the form which the commotion occasioned by it takes.[9] Though this is doubtless true, yet the law, by reason of the combined opposition, became a dead letter and the people who would have been most benefited by its enforcement joined with Cassius' enemies at the expiration of his term of office to condemn him to death. In this way does ignorance commonly reward its benefactors. This agitation aroused by Cassius, stirred the Roman Commonwealth, now more than twenty years old, to its very foundations, but it had no immediate effect upon the ager publicus. The rich patrician together with the few plebeians who had wealth enough to farm this land, still held undisputed possession. The poor plebeian still continued to shed his blood on the battle field to add to Roman territory, but no foot of it did he obtain. Wealth centralized. Pauperism increased.

SEC. [6.]—AGRARIAN MOVEMENTS BETWEEN 486 AND 367.

Modern historians who have written upon the Roman Republic have, so far as I know, passed immediately from the consideration of the Lex Cassia to the law of Licinius Stolo. Meanwhile more than a century had passed away. Cassius died in 485, Licinius Stolo proposed his law in 376. During this century which had beheld the organization of the republic and the growth, by tardy processes, of the great plebeian body many agrarian laws were proposed and numerous divisions of the public land took place. Both Dionysius and Livy mention them. The poor success of the proposition of Cassius and the evil consequences to himself in no way checked the zeal of the tribunes. Propositions of agrarian laws followed one another with wonderful rapidity. Livy enumerates these propositions, but almost wholly without detail and without comments upon their tendencies or points of difference from one another or from the law of Cassius. As this law failed of its object by being disregarded, we may safely conclude that the most of these propositions were but a reproduction of the law of Cassius.