[36] W. P., Vol. II, p. 281.
[37] W. P., Vol. II, p. 244.
[38] Z., II, XXXVII.
[39] Z., I. XVIII.
[40] T. I., Part 10, Aph. "Nature, estimated artistically, is no model. It exaggerates, it distorts, it leaves gaps. Nature is accident. Studying 'according to nature' seems to me a bad sign; it betrays subjection, weakness, fatalism; this lying-in-the-dust before petit fails is unworthy of a complete artist. Seeing what is—that belongs to another species of intellects, to the anti-artistic, to the practical."
[41] See Woltmann and Woermann, History of Painting, Vol. I, p. 62
[42] B. T., p. 59. See also Schopenhauer, Parerga und Paralipomena, Vol. II, p. 447.
[43] W. P., Vol. II, p. 255.
[44] W. P., Vol. II, p. 241.
[45] W. P., Vol. II, p. 95: "A people that are proud of themselves, and who are on the ascending path of Life, always picture another existence as lower and less valuable than theirs."