The Kellys and the O’Kellys

or, Landlords and Tenants

by Anthony Trollope

1848


Contents

[I. The Trial]
[II. The Two Heiresses]
[III. Morrison’s Hotel]
[IV. The Dunmore Inn]
[V. A Loving Brother]
[VI. The Escape]
[VII. Mr Barry Lynch Makes a Morning Call]
[VIII. Mr Martin Kelly Returns to Dunmore]
[IX. Mr Daly, the Attorney]
[X. Dot Blake’s Advice]
[XI. The Earl of Cashel]
[XII. Fanny Wyndham]
[XIII. Father and Son]
[XIV. The Countess]
[XV. Handicap Lodge]
[XVI. Brien Boru]
[XVII. Martin Kelly’s Courtship]
[XVIII. An Attorney’s Office in Connaught]
[XIX. Mr Daly Visits the Dunmore Inn]
[XX. Very Liberal]
[XXI. Lord Ballindine at Home]
[XXII. The Hunt]
[XXIII. Dr Colligan]
[XXIV. Anty Lynch’s Bed-Side; Scene the First]
[XXV. Anty Lynch’s Bed-Side; Scene the Second]
[XXVI. Love’s Ambassador]
[XXVII. Mr Lynch’s Last Resource]
[XXVIII. Fanny Wyndham Rebels]
[XXIX. The Countess of Cashell in Trouble]
[XXX. Lord Kilcullen Obeys His Father]
[XXXI. The Two Friends]
[XXXII. How Lord Kilcullen Fares in His Wooing]
[XXXIII. Lord Kilcullen Makes Another Visit to the Book-Room]
[XXXIV. The Doctor Makes a Clean Breast of It]
[XXXV. Mr Lynch Bids Farewell to Dunmore]
[XXXVI. Mr Armstrong Visits Grey Abbey on a Delicate Mission]
[XXXVII. Veni; Vidi; Vici]
[XXXVIII. Wait Till I Tell You]
[XXXIX. It Never Rains but It Pours]
[XL. Conclusion]

CHAPTER I.
THE TRIAL

During the first two months of the year 1844, the greatest possible excitement existed in Dublin respecting the State Trials, in which Mr O’Connell, [1] his son, the Editors of three different repeal newspapers, Tom Steele, the Rev. Mr Tierney—a priest who had taken a somewhat prominent part in the Repeal Movement—and Mr Ray, the Secretary to the Repeal Association, were indicted for conspiracy. Those who only read of the proceedings in papers, which gave them as a mere portion of the news of the day, or learned what was going on in Dublin by chance conversation, can have no idea of the absorbing interest which the whole affair created in Ireland, but more especially in the metropolis. Every one felt strongly, on one side or on the other. Every one had brought the matter home to his own bosom, and looked to the result of the trial with individual interest and suspense.

Even at this short interval Irishmen can now see how completely they put judgment aside, and allowed feeling and passion to predominate in the matter. Many of the hottest protestants, of the staunchest foes to O’Connell, now believe that his absolute imprisonment was not to be desired, and that whether he were acquitted or convicted, the Government would have sufficiently shown, by instituting his trial, its determination to put down proceedings of which they did not approve. On the other hand, that class of men who then styled themselves Repealers are now aware that the continued imprisonment of their leader—the persecution, as they believed it to be, of “the Liberator” [2]—would have been the one thing most certain to have sustained his influence, and to have given fresh force to their agitation. Nothing ever so strengthened the love of the Irish for, and the obedience of the Irish to O’Connell, as his imprisonment; nothing ever so weakened his power over them as his unexpected enfranchisement [3]. The country shouted for joy when he was set free, and expended all its enthusiasm in the effort.