To the earliest and least definite division of the geological annals various names have been applied. Some writers, believing that this period preceded the first appearance of plants or animals upon the globe, have named it Azoic—the lifeless age of geological history. But the absence of any hitherto detected trace of organic existence among the oldest known rocks cannot be held to prove that these rocks were formed before the advent of living things on the surface of the earth. The chance discovery of a single fossil, which might at any moment be made, would show the name "Azoic" to be a misnomer. Other geologists, believing that, as a matter of fact, organic structures of low types do actually occur in them, have called these old rocks "Eozoic," to denote that they were deposited during the dawn of life upon our planet. But the supposed organisms have not been everywhere accepted as evidence of former life. By many able observers they are regarded as mere mineral aggregates. Another term, "Archæan," has been proposed for the primeval ages of geological history, which are recorded in rocks that carry us as far as may ever be possible towards the beginnings of that history.
In choosing some general term to include the oldest known parts of the earth's crust, geologists are apt unconsciously to assume that the rocks thus classed together represent a definite section of geological time, comparable, for instance, to that denoted by one of the Palæozoic systems. Yet it is obvious that, under one of these general terms of convenient classification, a most multifarious series of rocks may be included, representing not one but possibly many, and widely separated, periods of geological history.
In many countries the oldest sedimentary accumulations, whether fossiliferous or not, are underlain by a series of crystalline rocks, which consist in great part of coarse massive gneisses and other schists. All over the world these rocks present a singular sameness of structure and composition. What might be found below them no man can say. They are in each country the oldest rocks of which anything is yet known, and whatsoever may be our theory of their origin, we must, at least for the present, start from them as the fundamental platform of the terrestrial crust.
But though crystalline rocks of this persistent character are widely distributed, both in the Old World and in the New, they in themselves furnish no means of determining their precise geological age. No method has yet been devised whereby the oldest gneiss of one country can be shown to be the true stratigraphical equivalent of the oldest gneiss of another. Palæontology is here of no avail, and Petrology has not yet provided us with such a genetic scheme as will enable us to make use of minerals and rock-structures, as we do of fossils, in the determination of geological horizons. All that can be positively affirmed regarding the stratigraphical relations of the rocks in question is that they are vastly more ancient than the oldest sedimentary and fossiliferous formations in each country where they are found. The "Lewisian" gneiss of the north-west of Scotland, the "Urgneiss" of Central Europe, and the "Laurentian" gneiss of Canada occupy similar stratigraphical positions, and present a close resemblance in lithological characters. We may conveniently class them under one common name to denote this general relationship. But we have, as yet, no means of determining how far they belong to one continuous period of geological history. They may really be of vastly different degrees of antiquity.
From the very nature of the case, any name by which we may choose to designate such ancient rocks cannot possess the precise stratigraphical value of the terms applied to the fossiliferous formations. Yet the convenience of possessing such a general descriptive epithet is obvious.
Until much more knowledge of the subject has been gained, any terminology which may be proposed must be regarded as more or less provisional. The comprehensive term "pre-Cambrian" may be usefully adopted as a general designation for all rocks older than the base of the Cambrian system, irrespective of their nature and origin. Already it is well known that under this term a vast series of rocks, igneous and sedimentary, is included. In some regions several successive formations, or systems of formations, may be recognized in this series. But until some method has been devised for determining the stratigraphical relations of these formations in different regions, it would seem safest not to attempt to introduce general names for universal adoption, but to let the sequence of rocks in each distinct geological province be expressed by a local terminology. This caution is more especially desirable in the case of sedimentary deposits. We may surmise as to the equivalence of the rocks called Huronian, Torridonian and Longmyndian, but whilst so much is mere conjecture, it is certainly injudicious to transfer the local names of one province to the rocks of another.
The only relaxation of this general precaution which I think may at present be made is the adoption of a common name for the oldest type of gneisses. The term "Archæan" has been applied to these rocks, and if it is used simply to express a common petrographical type, occupying the lowest horizon in the stratigraphical series of a country, it has obvious advantages. But I would still retain the local names as subordinate terms to mark the local characteristics of the Archæan rocks of each province. Thus the "Laurentian" rocks of Canada and the "Lewisian" rocks of Scotland are widely-separated representatives of the peculiar stratigraphical series which is known as Archæan.
The pre-Cambrian rocks of Britain include several distinct systems or groups. How far those of even one part of this comparatively limited region are the proper equivalents of those of another and distant part is a problem still unsolved. Hence each distinct area, with its own type of rocks, will here be treated by itself. The following rock-types will be described: I. The Lewisian (Archæan) Gneiss; II. The Younger (Dalradian) Schists of Scotland; III. The Gneisses and Schists of Anglesey; IV. The Uriconian Group; V. The Malvern Group; VI. The Charnwood Forest Group (see [Map I.]).
i. THE LEWISIAN (ARCHAÆN) GNEISS
The British Isles are singularly fortunate in possessing an admirable development of pre-Cambrian rocks. These ancient masses rise up in various parts of the islands, but the region where they are most extensively displayed, and where their stratigraphical position and sequence are most clearly shown, lies in the north-west of Scotland.[50] In that territory they form the whole chain of the Outer Hebrides, and likewise extend as an irregular selvage along the western margin of the counties of Sutherland and Ross. The lowest known platform of the fossiliferous formations has there been discovered and has been traced for a distance of more than 100 miles. From this definite horizon, the high antiquity of all that lies below it is impressively demonstrated. The accompanying diagram ([Fig. 35]) will explain the general relations of the various geological formations of the region.