Under any computation or measurement, the total thickness of detrital material in this series of formations must amount to several thousand feet. The chief interest centres in the middle series, which consists largely of fragmental volcanic rocks, with intercalations of slate and grit. As was first shown by Mr. Hill and Professor Bonney, these volcanic materials vary from exceedingly coarse agglomerates to fine, ashy or felspathic slates. In most cases distinct bedding can be recognized in them, but more particularly in the fine-grained material. Yet even among the massive agglomerates a tendency may be seen towards an orientation of the blocks with their long axes parallel. That this arrangement is not entirely due to the effects of cleavage may be inferred from the many exceptions to it, which would hardly have occurred had such powerful cleavage affected the whole district, as would be needed to rearrange the large blocks in the agglomerates. Besides, the coarser parts often intercalate with fine felspathic grits, which distinctly mark the stratification of the whole.
The remarkably coarse breccia of Benscliffe is mainly made up of blocks of quartz-porphyry, felsite or rhyolite, with slate fragments. The Roecliffe agglomerate, another extraordinarily coarse rock, consists of slate fragments imbedded in an andesitic matrix, some of the blocks of slate being six feet long. The finer tuffs have been ascertained to consist of felsitic or andesitic detritus, sometimes forming exceedingly compact flinty rocks or hornstones.
In this thick accumulation of detrital rocks we are presented with a series of alternations of coarser and finer pyroclastic material, interstratified among green, grey and purple slates and grits, which probably represent the non-volcanic sediments of the time of eruption. The succession of strata bears witness to a long series of eruptions of varying intensity, but culminating at two distinct periods in the discharge of huge blocks of rock (Benscliffe and Roecliffe agglomerates).
After some search I have been unable to detect a single vesicular fragment among the stones in the breccias and tuffs, and Messrs. Hill and Bonney were not more successful. Not a trace of anything in the least degree scoriaceous is anywhere to be found. The paste in which the blocks lie consists of such fine material as would result from the trituration of felsite and slate. It contains many broken crystals of felspar, with grains of clear quartz. A gradation can be traced from the coarser into the finer bands of volcanic and non-volcanic material, fine slates being also interleaved with highly-felspathic partings of grit.
Having looked with some care for a trace of a true volcanic neck in the district, I have not seen anything that could be unhesitatingly so designated. Even in the north-western part of the district, where the breccias are coarsest, and there is least trace of ordinary sediments, some signs of bedding can usually be detected in the position of the imbedded stones and the partings of finer tuff. Both the coarser and finer detritus suggest the kind of material discharged from vents before the uprise of any lava. The entire absence of scoriaceous fragments is noteworthy, and the abundance of slate blocks rather points to the early eruptions of a volcanic focus. Possibly, while the chief centre of eruption lay towards the north-west, numerous vents may have been opened all over the district, discharging abundant showers of dust and stones, but seldom or never culminating in the actual outpouring of lava.
No indubitable lava-sheet has, in my judgment, been yet recognized in Charnwood Forest. Various opinions have been expressed as to some of the more compact close-grained rocks, and even the verdicts of the same observers have varied from time to time, the rocks once considered as felsites being afterwards regarded as tuffs, and subsequently placed with the felsites or andesites after all. It is not necessary for my present purpose to enter into these questions, which are rather of local interest. I will only say that, in my opinion, the rocks of Sharpley, Peldar, and Bardon Hill are massive rocks, as they have finally been classed by Messrs. Hill and Bonney. But I cannot look upon them as lavas, at least I have seen no evidence to lead me to believe that they were ever erupted at the surface. I have fully considered the arguments of Mr. Hill and Professor Bonney on this point.[79] There can, I think, be no doubt of the close association of these felsitic rocks and the breccias, but the structure of the rocks in the field seems to me to be decidedly in favour of the view expressed above. The microscope affords no assistance in the question.[80] The doubtful rocks seem to me rather to be intrusive masses which have been protruded into the volcanic sedimentary series among which they rise. They are acid, fine-grained, porphyritic rocks, which would formerly have been included under the general name of felsites or quartz-porphyries. Their coarse porphyritic parts rapidly pass into close-grained felsitic material. Many of the blocks in the breccias are precisely like parts of these rocks. It might hence be asserted that these fragmental deposits are later than the eruptive bosses. At least it is obvious that rocks of the same type as those of Sharpley, Peldar, and Bardon Hill must have been disrupted to produce the coarse breccias.
[79] Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. xlvii. (1891), pp. 80-88.
[80] See Messrs. Hill and Bonney, op. cit. xxxiv. (1878), p. 211.
Later eruptive rocks, consisting of masses of syenite and granite, with still younger dykes of dolerite, andesite, diorite and felsite, have successively made their appearance, and add to the diversity of the igneous phenomena of this district.
The question of the age of this isolated volcanic series is one of much interest, but of great perplexity. Though a resemblance may be admitted to exist between some of the slates and parts of the Cambrian system of North Wales, the difference between the Charnwood rocks and the undoubted Cambrian series of Warwickshire, only thirteen miles to the south-west, is such as to indicate that the former are probably older than the latter. While the Charnwood rocks have been intensely cleaved and crushed, those of Warwickshire have undergone no such change. The argillaceous strata in the one region have been converted into slates, in the other they remain mere shales. Though cleavage is sometimes irregularly developed, its rapid disappearance in so short a distance as the interval between Charnwood Forest and Nuneaton seems most explicable if we suppose that the rocks at the more easterly locality were cleaved before those towards the west were deposited. If this inference be well grounded the pre-Cambrian age of the Charnwood volcanoes would be established. But the argument is not conclusive. No fossils of any kind have yet been found in any of the old rocks of Charnwood.[81] Merely lithological resemblances or differences are all that can be used as a guide to the geological age of these masses. Mr. Watts has suggested that possibly the quartzite of Bradgate (No. 6 of the Charnwood groups) may be the equivalent of the quartzite which in Shropshire and Warwickshire forms the base of the sedimentary Cambrian formations. If that correlation could be established, the volcanic series below the quartzite in Charnwood might be regarded as representing the Uriconian volcanic series of Shropshire.