“Kennedy,” he said huskily, “I wouldn’t care if there was insanity in her family—for, my God!—the tragedy of it all now—I love her!”
He turned, following Kennedy’s eyes in my direction, and I saw on his face the most haggard, haunting look of anxiety that I had ever seen on a young person.
Instantly I recognized from the pictures I had seen in the newspapers young Quincy Atherton, the last of this famous line of the family, who had attracted a great deal of attention several months previously by what the newspapers had called his search through society for a “eugenics bride,” to infuse new blood into the Atherton stock.
“You need have no fear that Mr. Jameson will be like the other newspaper men,” reassured Craig, as he introduced us, mindful of the prejudice which the unpleasant notoriety of Atherton’s marriage had already engendered in his mind.
I recalled that when I had first heard of Atherton’s “eugenic marriage,” I had instinctively felt a prejudice against the very idea of such cold, calculating, materialistic, scientific mating, as if one of the last fixed points were disappearing in the chaos of the social and sex upheaval.
Now, I saw that one great fact of life must always remain. We might ride in hydroaeroplanes, delve into the very soul by psychanalysis, perhaps even run our machines by the internal forces of radium—even marry according to Galton or Mendel. But there would always be love, deep passionate love of the man for the woman, love which all the discoveries of science might perhaps direct a little less blindly, but the consuming flame of which not all the coldness of science could ever quench. No tampering with the roots of human nature could ever change the roots.
I must say that I rather liked young Atherton. He had a frank, open face, the most prominent feature of which was his somewhat aristocratic nose. Otherwise he impressed one as being the victim of heredity in faults, if at all serious, against which he was struggling heroically.
It was a most pathetic story which he told, a story of how his family had degenerated from the strong stock of his ancestors until he was the last of the line. He told of his education, how he had fallen, a rather wild youth bent in the footsteps of his father who had been a notoriously good clubfellow, under the influence of a college professor, Dr. Crafts, a classmate of his father’s, of how the professor had carefully and persistently fostered in him an idea that had completely changed him.
“Crafts always said it was a case of eugenics against euthenics,” remarked Atherton, “of birth against environment. He would tell me over and over that birth gave me the clay, and it wasn’t such bad clay after all, but that environment would shape the vessel.”
Then Atherton launched into a description of how he had striven to find a girl who had the strong qualities his family germ plasm seemed to have lost, mainly, I gathered, resistance to a taint much like manic depressive insanity. And as he talked, it was borne in on me that, after all, contrary to my first prejudice, there was nothing very romantic indeed about disregarding the plain teachings of science on the subject of marriage and one’s children.