[321] Millin, iii. 212 (1803).
[322] The two words are as follows:
| m | n | i | sh | i | y | correct | |||||||||||||
| 𐏃 | · | 𐎧 | · | 𐎠 | · | 𐎶 | · | 𐎴 | · | 𐎡 | · | 𐏁 | · | 𐎡 | · | 𐎹 | · | ||
| Grotefend | A | kh | a | o | tsch | o | sch | o | h |
| m | z | correct | |||||||||||||
| 𐎠 | · | 𐎢 | · | 𐎼 | · | 𐎶 | · | 𐏀 | · | 𐎭 | · | 𐎠 | · | ||
| Grotefend | A or E | u | r | o | gh | d | a or e |
[323] Menant, Les Langues perdues, p. 111.
[324] Millin, xi. 99 (1803).
[325] Millin, vi. 96.
[326] Heeren (Eng. ed.), ii. 330.
[327] The Caillou Michaux. De Sacy also held that this inscription was different from the third Persepolitan, and that the Babylonian bricks and cylinders offered another variety (Millin, 1803, v. 440). De Sacy reported that the inscriptions on the bricks at Paris differed entirely from the inscriptions published by Hager (Hager, p. 58, note.)
[328] Heeren (Eng. ed.), ii. 324-5; Millin, ii. 372; cf. Werke, xi. 334, 339, 355. Heeren also thought the first species was the oldest.