To sum up the various arguments advanced on this subject, we may come to the following conclusion.

As already intimated, the saving effected by painting by immersion or by spraying as compared with brushing is very large indeed, provided that a properly equipped plant is employed, and the paint or enamel is exactly fitted for the purpose. The question must often arise as to whether dipping or spraying is the best and cheapest to employ. The answer is that everything will depend upon the nature of the article that is to be painted. Speaking generally, painting by immersion possesses many advantages, because the actual work of applying the paint is done in a few minutes and every part of the article is covered with paint at one time. In reaping machinery, iron treads of staircases and many other parts of the kind in which there are a large number of small parts or depressions, paint dipping cannot be improved upon; on the other hand, spraying possesses distinct advantages in dealing with many classes of goods which are of such a shape or character that if the paint were applied by dipping some accumulation in parts would inevitably occur.

A decision on the subject can only be arrived at after a very careful study in comparison of the two methods. It will frequently be found that, on the whole, the most economical plan to pursue is to dip the first and subsequent coats, excepting the last, and to spray this on, particularly when it consists of varnish or a viscous liquid. It is in this particular that one can draw a wide distinction between the two methods. In dipping, the paint must not be very thick, and, as previously stated, in designing a paint for the purpose the greatest effort is made to produce one which gives a happy medium between excessive thickness and the reverse, too thin a coat. Just as soon as the peculiarities of the article to be painted necessitate the use of all thick paint or enamel it must be considered that dipping is not suitable, but that spraying is. The latter may be employed successfully with any liquid up to the thickness of tar.

Fig. 111.—Airostyle Plant showing Ventilator and Portion of Hoods for 4 or 6 Hoods Providing for Subsequent Enlargement.

Fig. 112.—Elevation of Spraying Plant.