[83] Cat. Lep. Ins. East Ind. Comp., Pl. XIII. [Figured also by Butler (=Chæerocampa Silhetensis, Walker), loc. cit. Pl. XCII., Fig. 8. R.M.]
[84] Cat. Lep. Ins. East Ind. Comp., Pl. XIII. [Figured also by Butler, loc. cit. Pl. XCI., Fig. 1. R.M.]
[85] Horsfield and Moore, loc. cit. Pl. X.
[86] Ibid. [=Pergesa Acteus, Walker. R.M.]
[87] [Figured also by Burmeister, loc. cit. Pl. XV., Fig. 3. R.M.]
[88] Horsfield and Moore, loc. cit., Pl. XI.
[89] To be accurate this should be designated the infra-spiracular line; but this term cannot be well applied except in cases where there is also a supra-spiracular line, as, for instance, in Anceryx (Hyloicus) Pinastri.
[90] Upon this fact obviously depends the statement of that extremely accurate observer Rösel, that the caterpillar of Euphorbiæ is but very slightly variable (“Insektenbelustigungen,” Bd. iii. p. 36). I formerly held the same opinion, till I convinced myself that this species is very constant in some localities, but very variable in others. It appears that local influences make the caterpillar variable.
[91] The green is considerably too light in [Fig. 45].
[92] “Die Pflanzen und Raupen Deutschlands.” Berlin, 1860, p. 83.