[R] Though numberless passages will occur in the course of the book, where Celsus expressly delivers his own judgment, yet as the reader may perhaps chuse to have some of the most remarkable at one view, the following references will serve for that purpose. Lib. i. c. 3. p. 30. Neque ignoro, &c. Commoneo tamen, &c. Lib. ii. c. 14. p. 88. Quas tamen, &c. p. 89. Neque ignoro quosdam, &c. Lib. iii. c. 2. p. 140. Ego tum hoc puto, &c. c. 14. p. 144. Tutius tamen, &c. c. 18. p. 150. Quid igitur est, &c. Lib. iv. c. 4. p. 200. Melius huic rei, &c. c. 17. p. 227. Interdum teretes videmus, &c. c. 19. p. 230. Ego experimentis, &c. Lib. vi. c. 4. p. 345. Sed nihil melius est, &c. Lib. vii. c. 12. p. 446. Ego autem cognovi, &c. c. 14. p. 450. Sed abunde est, &c. Lib. viii. c. 2. p. 509. Neque audiendi, &c. c. 3. p. 512. Ut quando os perrumpitur, sentiamus, &c. c. 4. p. 517. Sed multo melius est, &c. c. 8. p. 528. Ex dolore colligimus, &c. c. 13. p. 546. Ponendum autem hoc esse credidi, &c. Any person, who will be at the pains to examine these passages, will easily see, that they strongly support the conclusion drawn from the two above recited. [See Linden or Almeloveen’s edition.]
[S] Lib. iii. c. 4.
[T] The first three of these epistles were annexed to an edition of Celsus, by Vulpius, at Padua, in the year 1722; five more were added to another by the same editor in the year 1752; in both which editions he has every where followed (only correcting typographical errors) the text of Almeloveen.
[U] Lib. v. cap. 17.
[V] Dissertation on the Denarius.
[W] Rhodius de Ponderib. et Mensur. Cels.
[X] Διαιτητικὴ.
[Y] Φαρμακευτικὴ.
[Z] Χειρουργικὴ.
[AA] Εμπειρικοὶ.