These theories of the theater, which I feel to be mine, wherever I may have derived them, I have discussed now and again in the present volume, as I discussed them earlier in the ‘Principles of Playmaking,’ in the ‘Development of the Drama,’ in the ‘Study of the Drama’ and in my biographies of Shakspere and Molière. In many years of lecturing to graduate classes I have found them useful in arousing the interest of students always eager to acquire insight into technic. What a dramatist meant to do—that is something about which we may endlessly dispute. What he actually did—that is something we can test and measure.

B. M.

Columbia University
in the City of New York


CONTENTS

PAGE
IPlaywrights on Playmaking[1]
IIUndramatic Criticism[17]
IIIOld Plays and New Playgoers[37]
IVTragedies with Happy Endings[57]
VOn the Advantage of Having a Pattern[79]
VIDid Shakspere Write Plays to Fit His Actors?[97]
VIIStrange Shaksperian Performances[119]
VIIIThackeray and the Theater[137]
IXMark Twain and the Theater[159]
XHenry James and the Theater[185]
XIStage Humor[205]
XIIThe “Old Comedies”[227]
XIIIThe Organization of the Theater[245]
XIVMemories of Actors[281]

I

PLAYWRIGHTS ON PLAYMAKING