Still, the attraction of the southern ocean waters into the northern seas must have commenced as soon as the growing ice-sheets of the large continents and islands of the high northern latitudes surpassed the growth and weight of the glaciers on the smaller lands of the southern hemisphere.
Hence the attraction of the ocean waters northward overcomes the force of the prevailing winds from moving an undue portion of the ocean’s surface waters southward. Consequently, the movement of water from the southern seas into the northern latitudes continued so long as the vast northern ice-sheets increased in weight greater than the glaciers of the southern hemisphere. Therefore, at the perfection of a frigid age straits and channels situated so far southward as the Magellan and Cape Horn channels were much diminished in width and depth or entirely deprived of their waters. Through this cause such reduced channels were readily filled with glaciers in a region of great snow-fall. The depth of water on the submerged northern lands at the close of the glacial period is not known.
According to Professor Dawson, in the township of Montague in Ontario the skeleton of a whale was found in post-glacial deposits 440 feet above tide-water, and marine shells are known to occur on Montreal mountain at an elevation of 520 feet above the ocean; and it is said that there are traces of submergence of over one thousand feet in the higher latitudes, including the islands of Great Britain.
According to the researches of Dr. J. W. Spencer, one great sheet of water covered most of the great lake region about the close of the ice age; and the lower strands of these inland seas are known to be connected with old marine shore lines. The probable reason why so few sea-shells collected on the glacial drift during such times was because of so much marine life having been exterminated in the high northern latitudes during the frigid age. Therefore, the sea, in the short period of northern submergence, left but few traces on the glacial drift it once flowed.
Thus it will be seen that, if the ocean waters were attracted northward through the preponderance of northern ice-sheets, they not only assisted in melting the northern ice, but also served to greatly reduce the waters in the Cape Horn channel, and so largely prevented the independent circulation of the southern ocean, thus furthering a mild climate in the southern hemisphere until the prevailing winds, after the northern ice-sheets were melted, were able to move more of the ocean waters southward than they could move northward, owing to the ocean currents setting southward being less obstructed than the lesser currents setting northward. This tendency of the ocean waters to move southward I have before explained in the preceding pages.
But I will say in addition that, on further consideration, it seems that one of the main causes of the waters of the augmented northern oceans moving southward so soon after the melting of the ice from the northern lands was on account of so much water being attracted southward to the great low sea-level east of Cape Horn. This vast low sea-level remained a great area of attraction for the northern seas until so much northern water was moved into the southern ocean as to reduce the seas of the northern hemisphere and augment the southern ocean sufficiently to enlarge the Cape Horn channel, thus causing the extinction of the vast low sea-level that furnished such great attraction for the waters of the more northern latitudes.
If the earth-movement hypothesis, so wholly rejected by Professor Geikie, fails to explain the cause or causes of a northern ice age, it seems to be still more inadequate for explaining the occurrence of ice periods extending over both hemispheres. For it is not probable that portions of continents and large islands rose above the snow-line in both temperate zones during the same period of time, and then again obtained their present level with the occurrence of a mild era.
Those who maintain that the continents of North America and Europe rose to great elevations during the ice age, in order to prove their assertions, point to the fiords which indent the eastern and western coasts of North America, and also to the fiords of Norway, as having been eroded by streams of ice that flowed along the bottom of such gorges when they were above the sea.
But it appears that such erosion could be performed by heavy glaciers with the lands at their present level. A glacier three thousand feet thick would fill and press heavily on the bottom of a gorge fifteen hundred feet in depth. Therefore, should the bottom of a fiord sink hundreds of feet below the sea-level, a glacier several thousand feet thick flowing through and over it into a sea of much greater depth, the erosion at the bottom of the sunken channel would be greater than on the land above the sea, where the ice possessed less weight.
Therefore, it is not necessary that lands pierced by deep fiords should have acquired a higher level during the ice age than they now maintain. And it is probable that on the antarctic continent ice erosion may be going on at much greater depths below the sea-level than the deepest channels in the high northern latitudes. For it is likely that the temperature of a glacier is so low in such frigid regions that it holds firmly in its freezing grasp such bowlders as may become detached from the rocks, thus giving it great erosive power.