[261]. Plotinus: “Enneades,” IV, 8, 3.
[262]. “Enneades,” III, 5, 9.
[263]. Ibid., p. 141.
[264]. Naturally this does not mean that the function of reality owes its existence to the differentiation in procreative instincts exclusively. I am aware of the undetermined great part played by the function of nutrition.
[265]. Malthusianism is the artificial setting forth of the natural tendency.
[266]. For instance, in the form of procreation as in general of the will.
[267]. Freud in his work on paranoia has allowed himself to be carried over the boundaries of his original conception of libido by the facts of this illness. He there uses libido even for the function of reality, which cannot be reconciled with the standpoint of the “Three Contributions.”
[268]. Bleuler arrives at this conclusion from the ground of other considerations, which I cannot always accept. See Bleuler, “Dementia Praecox,” in Aschaffenburg’s “Handbuch der Psychiatrie.”
[269]. See Jung: “Kritik über E. Bleuler: Zur Theorie des schizophrenen Negativismus.” Jahrbuch, Vol. III, p. 469.
[270]. Spielrein: “Über den psychologischen Inhalt eines Falles von Schizophrenie.” Jahrbuch, Vol. III, p. 329.