Imgur-Sin and Ilu-eriba sue Iatratum concerning a house which she bought of their father. Nonsuited. Before judges of Babylon and Sippara.[185]
Ṣilli-Ishtar and Eribam-Sin entered into partnership. On dissolution of their partnership they chose judges, paid in their common stock and shared equally. The shares are scheduled in the deed of settlement. Ḥammurabi 34.[186]
Pala-Shamash and Apil-itishu dispute concerning a division of property. They obtain judges and city witnesses. The whole house and income is shared equally and each agrees to waive further claim. Ḥammurabi (?).[187]
The two sons of Ḳû-Ishtar disagreed as to their shares. Nidnat-Sin, the rab Martu, makes equitable division. Ḥammurabi 33.[188]
Apil-ilishu and Pala-Shamash dispute the latter's right to a house, ship, servants, money, and property in his possession. The city elders from Ḥuda and Shibabi gave judgment and confirmed the title of Pala-Shamash.[189]
The sons of Nûr-Shamash sue Bêlitum for the property left her. Before judges. Nonsuited. Sumu-lâ-ilu.[190]
Shunu-ma-ili and Mâr-erṣitim sue Ribatum concerning her right to the legacy of Salâ and Mullubtim. The judges assign her an income, ḫibiltu. Samsu-iluna 2.[191]
Marduk-mubaliṭ and Sin-idinnam sue Shâd-Malkat concerning her house in Bît Gagim. Judges confirm her title. Apil-Sin.[192]
Ḥuzalum and Pî-Malkat, children of Nabi-Shamash implead Shidi-lamazatanḫu of Gagim concerning various rights to incomes and rations in the temple of Shamash. The judges assign shares to each. Samsu-iluna (?).[193]
Aliḳu and Sumu-ramê sue Shakumâtim about a house they sold him. Nonsuited. N. D.[194]