[129] It should be said that most of those who argue for Luke’s omission of so much Q material assign these sixteen sections to some special source of Luke’s.
[130] See especially Matthew’s “Go not into any way of the gentiles,” which might be assigned to Q, with obvious reasons for Luke’s omission.
[131] Pp. 222-25.
[132] See analyses on pp. 230-33.
[133] Pp. 222-35.
[134] See the reckoning made without inclusion of Marcan Q on pp. 162, 218.
[135] Still according to Harnack.
[136] Oxford Studies, p. 146.
[137] See pp. 234-46 for material in Mark and Q.
[138] A note by Professor Sanders says, quite correctly, that “The general agreement in translation words requires that one of these translations should have preceeded and influenced the other.”