is, however, most probably too high, as will be inferred later from the ionization temperature scale.

For the cooler stars small discrepancies also occur among the different observers. In the writer’s opinion, the lowest estimates for the temperatures of the cooler stars are probably nearest to the truth.

[TABLE VI]

StarAbott
Radiometric
Coblentz
Thermoelectric
Plaskett
Wedge Method
Sampson
Photoelectric
Ori()13000°25000°
Cas()15000°30000
Per()15000 14000
Ori()16000°10000 14800
Lyr()14000 800011600
()1100012800
(Cyg() 9000 900010900
Aql() 8000
Cas() 900010700
() 6000 8300
Aur() 5800 60005500-6000 5500 [*]
() 4000 4200
Gem() 55005000-5500 4200
Tau() 3000 3500 3400
Ori() 2600 3000 3400
Peg() 2850 3200

[*] Temperature assumed in calibration of scale.

It was mentioned at the outset that dwarf stars appear to be at a higher temperature than giants of the same spectral class. The following table summarizes the differences in temperature, as compiled by Seares.[56]

[TABLE VII]

Class Effective Temperature
GiantDwarf
6080°6080°
5300 5770
4610 5500
3860 4880
3270 4120
3080 3330

A more detailed list of giant and dwarf temperatures was compiled in 1922 by Hertzsprung[57] from all the material then available. The tabulation that follows contains his values for