[7] Works, vol. ii. p. 142.
[8] Of course, the man and his character are not two distinct things. The character is the man. But it would involve needless circumlocution to insist on superfine distinctions, and it may even help to a comprehension of the argument to keep to familiar forms of speech.
[9] International Journal of Ethics, vol. iv. pp. 421-422.
Transcriber's Note:
Minor punctuation errors have been corrected without note. Inconsistent hyphenation has not been changed.
The following corrections were made to the text:
[p. 17]: contantly to constantly (constantly enlarging and more comprehensive)
[p. 24]: admiting to admitting (even while admitting)
[p. 24]: which which to with which (with which it is used)
p. 28 ([Footnote 2]): contraint to constraint (Freedom and constraint)