If the gonococcus is not found, the diagnosis must be made from the consideration of the lesions that we know occur but rarely except in gonorrhea. Thus, urethritis is a strong diagnostic point in favor of gonorrhea; so is inflammation of the glands of the vestibule, of the fourchette, and of the vulvo-vaginal glands. Vaginitis not caused by the degenerations of old age, by traumatism, or by the discharge from a cancer of the cervix or from a vesico-vaginal fistula is usually of gonorrheal origin. This is especially true of vaginitis localized in the vaginal fornices.
Gonorrhea in women should be most carefully treated until all signs of the disease are eradicated. The treatment has already been discussed under the consideration of the different structures that may be attacked. Gonorrheal cervicitis and endometritis are the most difficult to cure, and it may be impossible to determine with certainty that the disease has been eradicated from these structures. If milder measures fail, the cervical canal and the body of the uterus should be completely curetted, and the raw surface should be treated with pure carbolic acid. The physician should never discharge the patient until she is thoroughly cured.
CHAPTER XXXIX.
THE TECHNIQUE OF GYNECOLOGICAL OPERATIONS.
The technique of some of the special gynecological operations, such as perineorrhaphy, and trachelorrhaphy, has already been considered in discussing the treatment of the conditions in which such operations are applicable. The general and local preparation of the patient, the instruments, the dressings, etc., and the technique of the general operations of gynecology that are applicable to a variety of different pathological conditions, such as oöphorectomy and hysterectomy, now demand consideration. The general rules of asepsis that are followed in gynecological operations are the same as those that should be observed in all surgical operations. And although every surgeon should strive to attain perfect asepsis in all operations, yet it is of especial importance for the gynecologist to do so, for he, more often than all others, invades the peritoneal cavity. Of the various structures of the body, the peritoneum is one of the most susceptible to septic influences; and septic infection of the peritoneum, unlike infection of other structures, implies not merely a local disturbance and delay of healing, but general sepsis and death.
Moreover, the gynecologist, operating in the peritoneum, cannot correct any imperfection in his aseptic technique by the use of antiseptic solutions, as can be done in other operations of general surgery. Such antiseptic solutions, if of sufficient strength to be of any value as germicides, are very dangerous in the peritoneum. They may produce fatal poisoning from absorption through the peritoneum; they destroy the delicate peritoneal surface, and thus diminish the very useful power of the peritoneum to absorb blood and serum after the operation; they cause intestinal and other adhesions; and they so impair the integrity of the intestinal walls that septic organisms may be enabled to pass through and infect the general peritoneum.
The gynecologist, thus debarred from the use of antiseptics during a peritoneal operation, must rely altogether upon the perfection of his aseptic technique.
It must not be forgotten that the danger of peritoneal infection, though very much less in the minor gynecological operations on the perineum and the cervix, is yet never altogether absent. The whole genital tract of women communicates directly with the peritoneum, and infection at any point may extend and cause fatal peritoneal sepsis.
The danger increases with the proximity of the infected point to the peritoneum. The danger of salpingitis and peritonitis from trivial intra-uterine manipulations not performed aseptically, such as the passage of a dirty sound, has already been referred to. Fatal peritonitis has followed trachelorrhaphy.