The year 1635, which saw the beginning of the Hull plague, at a time when the infection was absolutely quiet in the capital, saw also the beginning of an outbreak at Sandwich, with accompanying cases at Canterbury, and a beginning at Yarmouth, Lynn and Norwich[1050], in all which places the infections lingered at a low endemic level for a year or more. The dates are important only as showing that these provincial infections were looking up some months before the sharp outburst in London in the late autumn of 1636 made any sign. In Sandwich, on the 12th of March, 1637, there were 78 houses “visited,” and 188 persons infected; on June 30, 24 houses shut up, with 103 persons, some of them lodged in tents; from July 6 to October 5, there were buried of the plague about ten every week in St Clement’s parish. Considerable expenses were incurred (more than £40 a week), to which the county of Kent and the other Cinque Ports contributed[1051].
Besides these lingering endemics in Kent and Norfolk, the great plague epidemics of 1636 were in Newcastle and London. The Newcastle epidemic was both earlier and relatively far more severe than that of the capital. For a town of some 20,000 inhabitants, the following weekly figures[1052] indicate a plague of the first degree, comparable to the London death-rates of 1625 and 1665:
Died of plague at Newcastle, within the liberties, from May 7 to December 31, 1636:
| Week ending | Plague deaths | ||
| May | 14 | 59 | |
| 21 | 55 | ||
| 28 | 99 | ||
| June | 4 | 122 | |
| 11 | 99 | ||
| 18 | 162 | ||
| 25 | 133 | ||
| July | 2 | 172 | |
| 9 | 184 | ||
| 16 | 212 | ||
| 23 | 270 | ||
| 30 | 366 | ||
| Aug. | 7 | 337 | |
| 14 | 422 | ||
| 21 | 346 | ||
| 28 | 246 | ||
| Sept. | 4 | 520 | |
| 11 | 325 | ||
| To end of Dec. | 908 | ||
| Total to 31st Dec. | 5027 | ||
Besides in Garthside, from May 30 to October 17, 515, making a total of 5542.
This tremendous visitation of Tyneside is said to have begun in October, 1635, at North Shields, where the infection rested during the winter cold, to begin again at Newcastle in spring. During the height of the epidemic in summer and autumn all trade was suspended, no one being about in the streets or in the neighbouring highways. The means tried to check the infection were fumigations with pitch, rosin, and frankincense. Newcastle had one other visit from the plague, as we shall see, in 1644 and 1645, during and after the siege by the Scots Presbyterian army; but in 1665 it is said to have escaped, although Defoe says that the infection was introduced by colliers returning from the Thames.
The London Plague of 1636.
The London plague of 1636 was one of the second degree, for the capital, and was otherwise peculiar as being rather later in the autumnal season than usual. The following table of the weekly mortalities shows how it increased, reached a height, and declined.
| Christened | Buried in all | Buried of plague | |||||
| Dec. | 24 | 231 | 170 | 0 | |||
| 31 | 195 | 174 | 0 | ||||
| 1636 | |||||||
| Jan. | 7 | 217 | 189 | 0 | |||
| 14 | 242 | 174 | 0 | ||||
| 21 | 220 | 190 | 0 | ||||
| 28 | 214 | 171 | 0 | ||||
| Feb. | 4 | 227 | 183 | 0 | |||
| 11 | 234 | 160 | 0 | ||||
| 18 | 207 | 203 | 0 | ||||
| 25 | 198 | 238 | 0 | ||||
| Mar. | 3 | 221 | 198 | 0 | |||
| 10 | 231 | 194 | 0 | ||||
| 17 | 244 | 187 | 0 | ||||
| 24 | 215 | 177 | 0 | ||||
| 31 | 193 | 196 | 0 | ||||
| Apr. | 7 | 202 | 199 | 2 | |||
| 14 | 221 | 205 | 4 | ||||
| 21 | 202 | 205 | 7 | ||||
| 28 | 271 | 210 | 4 | ||||
| May | 5 | 197 | 206 | 4 | |||
| 12 | 199 | 254 | 41 | ||||
| 19 | 171 | 244 | 22 | ||||
| 26 | 160 | 263 | 38 | ||||
| June | 2 | 189 | 276 | 51 | |||
| 9 | 153 | 275 | 64 | ||||
| 16 | 145 | 325 | 86 | ||||
| 23 | 149 | 257 | 65 | ||||
| 30 | 141 | 273 | 82 | ||||
| July | 7 | 152 | 265 | 64 | |||
| 14 | 142 | 298 | 86 | ||||
| 21 | 146 | 350 | 108 | ||||
| 28 | 183 | 365 | 136 | ||||
| Aug. | 4 | 152 | 394 | 181 | |||
| 11 | 166 | 465 | 244 | ||||
| 18 | 167 | 546 | 284 | ||||
| 25 | 161 | 690 | 380 | ||||
| Sept. | 1 | 163 | 835 | 536 | |||
| 8 | 153 | 921 | 567 | ||||
| 15 | 166 | 1106 | 728 | ||||
| 22 | 172 | 1018 | 645 | ||||
| 29 | 168 | 1211 | 796 | ||||
| Oct. | 6 | 170 | 1195 | 790 | |||
| 13 | 164 | 1117 | 682 | ||||
| 20 | 174 | 855 | 476 | ||||
| 27 | 133 | 779 | 404 | ||||
| Nov. | 3 | 153 | 1156 | 755 | |||
| 10 | 164 | 966 | 635 | ||||
| 17 | 143 | 827 | 512 | ||||
| 24 | 162 | 747 | 408 | ||||
| Dec. | 1 | 168 | 550 | 290 | |||
| 8 | 175 | 335 | 143 | ||||
| 15 | 134 | 324 | 79 | ||||
| 9,522 | 23,359 | 10,400 | |||||
The parishes chiefly affected were the same as in 1625 and 1603. Stepney is still wanting from the general bill; but after 1636 it was included therein, along with Newington, Lambeth, Westminster, Islington and Hackney. These omitted parishes doubtless contributed largely, Stepney in particular, so that the total of plague-deaths would have to be increased by perhaps two thousand. The following parishes had the severest mortalities: