Rostrum.—I have already alluded to the peculiar compounded structure of this compartment, unlike anything we have as yet seen.[122] The thin outer lamina is quite continuous, and shows no trace of the triple nature of the compartment; as may be seen by comparing the drawing (Pl. [14], fig. [1 a]) of the shell of [C. testudinaria], with the transverse section (Pl. [15], fig. [1]) of the same species: in this latter figure, a is the outer lamina, and B A B the three compartments of the rostrum. But when the outer lamina is worn away, as is always the case with the upper part of the walls in [C. caretta] (Pl. [14], fig. [2]), the two fissures separating the three compartments of the compounded rostrum, are plainly exhibited on the outside of the upper part of the shell. On the internal surface, the sutures separating the three compartments are always open, except in the upper part of the sheath, above the attachment of the opercular membrane, where they are partially obliterated by a thin continuous layer of shell. That these three portions of the rostrum are in their essential nature compartments, is well shown in [C. patula] and [testudinaria], by the sheath or inner lamina having loopholes or channels (such as before described) in the middle of each, and on each line of suture. From the number of these channels, seven altogether, (the two between the compound rostrum and lateral compartments being counted,) the sheath of the compound rostrum is reduced to mere flattened pillars between the several channels. By slight violence, the rostrum breaks into the three portions; and the sutures between them are found to be marked on both sides by sinuous, slight, calcareous ridges, those on opposite sides locking into each; these represent the septa on the edges of the radii and alæ and their recipient furrows, in the ordinary compartments. The outline of the middle compartment of the three (best seen in section Pl. [15], fig. [1], A), much resembles that of the carina; in fact, if we suppose the growth of the two alæ of the carina to have been arrested, no essential difference can be pointed out: in this rudimentary compartment, therefore, we have a rostrum, characterised as in the sub-family of the [Chthamalinæ]. In the two little rostro-lateral compartments, moreover, (B B), a slight swelling on the side opposite to the large existing radius, shows that if the development of these compartments had not been prevented, each, probably, would have had, exactly as in the [Chthamalinæ], a radius on both sides. In the introduction to the [Balanidæ], I have argued, from the structure here described and from some other facts, that in the [Balaninæ] the rostrum is composed of the three anterior compartments, which we see in the [Chthamalinæ], indissolubly united together; hence in [Chelonobia] the middle one of the three partially-blended compartments is properly the rostrum, and those on the sides the rostro-lateral compartments.
[122] My attention was first called to this peculiar structure of the rostrum by Mr. Stutchbury.
Basis.—The basal membrane extends under the thick walls to the outside. I was not able to make out the whole cementing apparatus. The main trunk is remarkable from its small diameter, (f f in fig. [2], Pl. [28]), and from the distance at which the cement-glands stand apart. Each gland gives rise to a pair of cement-ducts, which tend to run in parallel groups; these ducts repeatedly bifurcate, occasionally inosculate, and decrease in diameter; they debouch and allow the cement to escape at numerous points, placed at irregular distances, on the edges of each new slip of the basal membrane.
Opercular Valves.—These are elongated; they do not fill the orifice of the shell; they are attached by a strong opercular membrane a little way down the sheath. The opercular membrane is generally double, for the last-formed membrane is not immediately moulted as soon as a new one is formed, as generally happens in [Balanus]. Externally, the valves are marked by rather rugged, broad zones of growth. The Scuta are elongated in the line of the orifice of the sack; the occludent margin (Pl. [14], fig. [1 b]) is much inflected, and generally sinuous; along this inflected portion a distinct square-edged ridge runs, which widens from the apex downwards. The depression for the adductor muscle is very deep: there are no pits or crests for the other muscles. When the scutum is thoroughly cleaned and all the membrane removed by caustic potash, the tergal margin is marked by a slight articular ridge and furrow. This articular ridge is very remarkable from supporting a prominent, flattened crest (fig. [1 b]), composed of hard, yellow, horny membrane, which overlaps the inner surface of the tergum, and exactly corresponds, in shape and purpose, with the calcareous articular ridge, when best developed in other genera. Beneath the basal and generally slightly sinuous exterior margin of the valve, that is, the margin to which the opercular membrane is attached, a slight ledge depends (fig. [1 d]), which narrows off towards the rostral end of the valve. I should have thought that this had been a depending adductor ridge, as in several species of [Pyrgoma], had there not been a nearly similar ledge beneath the middle part of the basal margin of the tergum. The Tergum is mitre-formed, with the summit more or less truncated, and with the carinal margin generally more sloping than the scutal margin: near the carinal margin there is a slight furrow (fig. [1 d]), sometimes difficult to be distinguished, with the lines of growth curving down to it on each side, and consequently with a very slight, but variable, corresponding projection on the basal margin. This furrow and slight projection, there can be hardly any doubt, represent the spur, though here placed close to the carinal instead of to the scutal margin, as in other genera. The tergum has a small articular ridge, against which the overlapping horny articular ridge of the scutum abuts. There are no crests for the tergal depressor muscles. Altogether the scuta and terga are very peculiar. A portion dissolved in acid exhibits no tubuli. On the opercular membrane there are no hairs. The rostral depressor muscles of the scuta are singularly feeble, each consisting of only one or two, or sometimes three or four, very thin ribbon-like fasciæ; the lateral depressores of the scutum are twice as strong as the rostral depressores; and the tergal depressores a little stronger than the lateral depressores. All these muscles are plainly marked with transverse striæ.
Mouth.—The labrum is not in the least bullate, which character, as well as some others that follow, I specify on account of the apparent affinity of [Chelonobia] to the [Chthamalinæ], as indicated by its rostrum. The crest of the labrum is notched, and on each side of the notch there is a long row of teeth, which, however, are sometimes worn away. The mandibles have five main teeth; all excepting the first being laterally double. The maxillæ are not notched. The outer maxillæ are bilobed on their inner sides.
Cirri.—The four posterior pairs, in proportion to the size of the animal, are much elongated, and are remarkable from the number of their short segments. The rami of the first cirrus are a little unequal in length. The second cirrus is moderately short, with its segments rather broad and protuberant, and thickly clothed with spines. The third cirrus is of unusual length, being but little shorter than the fourth pair; its segments, however, are broad, and are thickly clothed with spines, as are the two segments of its pedicel: hence there is no real approach to that important character of the [Chthamalinæ], namely, the similarity of the third with the three posterior pairs of cirri. The numerous segments of the fourth, fifth, and sixth pairs of cirri each support only two pairs of main spines; between each of these pairs there is a little tuft of fine intermediate spines; the upper of the two tufts on each segment is the longest. In a specimen of [C. patula], in which there were fifteen segments in one ramus of the second cirrus, there were fifty segments in either ramus of the sixth cirrus. At the exterior bases of the pedicels of some of the anterior cirri, there are large tufts of finely plumose, delicate hairs.
Branchiæ.—These are of large size: they consist of a single fold, much plicated and sub-plicated.
Ovaria.—The ovarian tubes run into the parietes, and fill up the interspaces between the radiating septa.
Range, &c.—The three species seem to range together, over the tropical and warmer temperate seas of the whole world. [C. patula] and [testudinaria] are found in the Mediterranean, and the former at Charleston, in the United States; I have not heard of specimens from any point further north. [C. testudinaria] and [caretta] live attached to turtles; whilst [C. patula] always adheres to crustacea, to large and smooth gasteropod mollusca, and, I believe, sometimes to ships’ bottoms. I have not heard of the discovery of any fossil species.
Attachment.—[Chelonobia patula] leaves no impression on the crabs and shells to which it is attached. I have seen only a few specimens of [C. testudinaria] attached, and the carapaces of the turtle were not at all, or scarcely at all, indented by them. The case is very different with [C. caretta], in which the shell, even of young specimens, is always, as far as I have seen, imbedded to some depth, and occasionally to a very great depth in the tortoise-shell. From the extreme hardness of the tortoise-shell, when dry, the imbedment appears more wonderful even than it really is. The younger shells have the appearance of having grown from within the carapace, and then of having burst through it, almost like little volcanos. I have seen only one very young shell (1/10th of an inch in external diameter) attached, and here there was nothing to countenance an idea which at one time occurred to me, namely, that the larva perhaps fixed itself in some little crack or cavity in the carapace, and there underwent its metamorphosis. I believe that the imbedment is effected simply by the sharp, growing, basal edges of the walls of the shell indenting the surface, and finally rupturing the outer laminæ of the tortoise-shell, through that same force by which the tender radicle of a plant penetrates very hard ground. As soon as the surface was once ruptured, the shell of the [Chelonobia], growing outwards and downwards, would easily, like a wedge, turn up the laminæ of the tortoise-shell; and their ragged ends would surround the [Chelonobia], as is seen actually to be the case. In the genus [Coronula] and its allies, which are attached to Cetaceans, we shall presently see, that the epidermis immediately under the downward growing shell, and apparently in consequence of the pressure thus exerted, is thinner than in the surrounding parts. In two specimens of [Chelonobia caretta], imbedded much more deeply than usual—in one of which half the basal edge of the shell had fairly cut through the carapace, and in the other was on the point of effecting this—the tortoise-shell manifestly thinned out towards the line of yielding; now this, I suppose, must be attributed either to absorption, or to the living tortoise-shell being actually stretched till rendered transparent and ready to burst or until bursted. On the latter view of the tortoise-shell having been stretched, we must further suppose that the pressure has prevented fresh layers of tortoise-shell being deposited under the old and yielding laminæ. In one of the above two specimens, the walls of the [Chelonobia] were deeply folded, nevertheless the laminæ of the tortoise-shell followed every curvature, showing that, though now so rigid, during the slow imbedment of the Cirripede it must have been sufficiently pliant. A shell attached, as these two specimens were, could never be removed, and, whether dead or alive, would remain for ever imbedded in the tortoise-shell. Dr. R. Ball, of Dublin, informs me, that he has seen specimens in which the shell of the cirripede not only had penetrated the carapace, but likewise the underlying bone, and had even entered some way into the body of the turtle: it is well known that the tusk of a boar or the horn of a ruminant, when curving in abnormally, will sometimes penetrate deeply into the bones of the face or head; and this, I believe, is effected, not by the fracture of the bone, but by the absorption of the point pressed on: I conceive a similar process must have taken place in the curious specimens examined by Dr. Ball.