[128] Mr. Goss, ‘Transact. Hort. Soc.,’ vol. v. p. 234: and Gärtner, ‘Bastarderzeugung,’ 1849, ss. 81 and 499.
[129] ‘Gardener’s Chronicle,’ 1854, p. 404.
[130] Ibid., 1866, p. 900.
[131] See also a paper by this observer read before the International Hort. and Bot. Congress of London, 1866.
[132] ‘Traité du Citrus,’ p. 40.
[133] ‘Transact. Hort. Soc.,’ vol. iii. p. 318. See also vol. v. p. 65.
[134] Prof. Asa Gray, ‘Proc. Acad. Sc.,’ Boston, vol. iv. 1860, p. 21. I have received statements to the same effect from other persons in the United States.
[135] For the French case see ‘Journ. Hort. Soc.,’ vol. i. new series, 1866, p. 50. For Germany, see M. Jack quoted in Henfrey’s ‘Botanical Gazette,’ vol. i. p. 277. A case in England has recently been alluded to by the Rev. J. M. Berkeley before the Hort. Soc. of London.
[136] ‘Philosophical Transactions,’ vol. xlvii. 1751-52, p. 206.
[137] Gallesio, ‘Teoria della Riproduzione,’ 1816, p. 95.