[230] See Vasilief, Le Bouddhisme, Troisième supplément, pp. 262 ff. Köppen, Rel. des Buddha, I. 151. Takakusu in J. Pali Text Society, 1905, pp. 67-146.
[231] Records, translated by Takakusu, p. 15.
[232] They are mentioned in the Sarva-darśana-saṅgraha.
[233] Kern (Indian Buddhism, p. 126) says they rejected the authority of the Sûtras altogether but gives no reference.
[234] See Vasilief, pp. 301 ff. and various notices in Hsüan Chuang and Watters. Also de la Vallée Poussin's article in E.R.E.
[235] Hsüan Chuang informs us that when he was in Śrughna he studied the Vibhâshâ of the Sautrântikas, but the precise significance of this term is not plain.
[236] Fa-Hsien's Travels, chap. XVI.
[237] This figure is probably deduced from some artificial calculation of possible heresies like the 62 wrong views enumerated in the Brahma-Jala sûtra.
[238] He must have lived in the fourth century as one of his works (Nanjio, 1243) was translated between 397 and 439.
[239] Watters, Yüan Chwang, II. 221-224. Nanjio, 1237. The works of Guṇamati also are said to show a deep knowledge of the Sânkhya philosophy.