[19] Consulta del gobierno de Filipinas sobre la formación de aquella audiencia, 2 de Mayo de 1718, Zulueta Mss., Manila.

[20] Report of Archbishop de la Cuesta on the Bustamante Affair, June 28, 1720, Blair and Robertson, XLIV, 182–195.

[21] Recopilación, 2–15–11.

[22] Ibid., 2–16–29.

[23] Contestación de la Compañía de Jesús, 6 de Mayo de 1718, Zulueta Mss., Manila.

[24] Recopilación, 2–16–93.

[25] Opinión de la Universidad de Santo Tomás, 9 de Mayo de 1718, Zulueta Mss., Manila.

[26] Recopilación, 2–16–44.

[27] The legal phases of this question together with the opinions of the royal fiscal and the leading councillors are set forth in the consulta of the Council of the Indies of March 18, 1720, A. I., 68–2–8. In this consulta an effort is made to fix responsibility for the murder of the governor, and to determine the legality of his acts.

[28] This refers to the reception of the French papal delegate, Tourón, who came to the Islands to inspect the archbishopric, and who was received by the audiencia without the authority of the Council of the Indies. This will be treated further in Chapter X of this book.