UPS AND DOWNS OF MARJORIE. Waggaman. 0 35
VIOLIN MAKER, THE. Adapted by Sara Trainer Smith. 0 35
WAYWARD WINIFRED. Sadlier. 1 00
WINNETOU, THE APACHE KNIGHT. Taggart. 0 50
WITCH OF RIDINGDALE. Bearne. 1 00
YOUNG COLOR GUARD. Bonesteel. 0 35
Footnotes
[1.]U. S. Constitution, Amendments, art. i, art. xiv, sec. 1.[2.]Lives of the Popes, Montor, vol. i, p. 94; Life of Leo XIII, “Philippine Question.”[3.]The Science of Jurisprudence, Taylor, p. 506; Historical Jurisprudence, Lee, p. 328.[4.]Ancient Egypt, Rawlinson, vol. i, p. 323.[5.]Historical Jurisprudence, Lee, pp. 98, 164, 274; History of England, Lingard, vol. i, c. vii; The Science of Jurisprudence, Taylor, p. 506.[6.]Historical Jurisprudence, Lee, p. 257.[7.]Historical Jurisprudence, Lee, p. 271.[8.]The Beginnings of Christianity, Shahan, 90.[9.]Elements of Ecclesiastical Law, Smith.[10.]Historical Jurisprudence, Lee, p. 387; Justinian, Sandar, p. 21.[11.]The Beginnings of Christianity, Shahan.[12.]Universal Church History, Alzog.[13.]Law Dictionary, Bouvier, “Benefit of Clergy,” “Canon Law”; Blackstone, vol. i, p. 460, vol. iii, p. 61.[14.]Blackstone, vol. i, p. 461.[15.]Justinian, Sandar, p. 21; Cyc, vol. viii, p. 366, vol. xiv, p. 1228; Eq. Jurisprudence, Pomeroy, vol. i, p. 1; The Science of Jurisprudence, Taylor, p. 255 et seq; Blackstone, vol. i, pp. 18-20, 63; Kent, vol. i, p. 10; English Constitution, Creasy.[16.]Blackstone, vol. i, p. 82, vol. iv, c. 33; The Science of Jurisprudence, Taylor, p. 337; Conflict of Laws, Wharton, sec. 172.[17.]The American Cyclopedia, “Bologna.”[18.]The Science of Jurisprudence, Taylor, p. 238.[19.]Blackstone, vol. i, pp. 18-20, 79, vol. iv, c. 33.[20.]Commentaries, Kent, vol. i, c. xi, pp. 342, 473, 515, 525-544, vol. ii, p. 27; Origin and Nature of the Constitution and Government of U. S., U. S. Sup. Ct. Reps., 9 L. Ed., 873.[21.]Commentaries, Kent, vol. i, p. 472; Blackstone, vol. i, p. 107.[22.]Commentaries, Kent, vol. ii, pp. 35-37; Conflict of Laws, Wharton (3rd ed.), vol. ii, pp. 1327-8.[23.]Law of Fraternities, Scanlan, ch. xxiv; Conflict of Laws, Wharton, sec. 109; Baxter v. McDonald, 155 N. Y., 83; 49 N. E., 667; Morris v. Dart, 67 S. C, 338; 45 S. E., 753; 100 Am. St. R., 734; Terrett v. Taylor, 13 U. S., 43; 3 L. Ed., 650.[24.]Weld v. May, 9 Cushing, Mass., 181.[25.]Martin v. State, 65 Tenn., 234.[26.]A Manual of Catholic Theology, Wilhelm and Scannell, p. xvii, et seq.[27.]A Catholic Dictionary, Addis and Arnold, “Dogma.”[28.]In re St. Louis Inst. of Christian Science, 27 Mo. App., 633.[29.]Hale v. Everett, 53 N. H., 9.[30.]State v. Trustees, 7 Ohio St., 58.[31.]Kniskern v. Lutheran Church, 1 Sandford, N. Y., Ch. 439.[32.]State v. Hallock, 16 Nev., 373.[33.]Stephenson v. Hanyon, 7 Dist. Ct. Rep. Pa., 585.[34.]State v. Board, 134 Mo., 296; 35 S. W., 617.[35.]Synod v. State, 2 S. Dak., 366; 50 N. W., 632; 14 L. R. A., 418.[36.]Stebbins v. Jennings, 10 Pick., Mass., 172.[37.]State v. District Board, 76 Wis., 177; 44 N. W., 967; 20 Am. St. Rep., 41; 7 L. R. A., 330.[38.]Hackett v. Brooksville, 27 Ky. L., 1021; 87 N. W., 792; 69 L. R. A., 592.[39.]State v. Board, 134 Mo., 296; 35 S. W., 617; 56 Am. St. Rep., 503.[40.]County v. Industrial School, 125 Ill., 540; 18 N. E., 183; 1 L. R. A., 437; 8 Am. St. Rep., 386.[41.]“Wis. Industrial School for Girls,” Wisconsin Blue Book. Session Laws of Wis., 1907, p. 1416 (index to Acts). Wis. Industrial School for Girls v. Clark Co., 103 Wis., 651; 79 N. W., 422.[42.]O'Connor v. Hendrick, 184 N. Y., 421; 77 N. E., 612.[43.]Hysong v. Gallitzen, 164 Pa., 629; 30 At., 482; 44 Am. St. Rep., 623; 26 L. R. A., 203; Dorner v. School Dist., 118 N. W., 353 (Nov. 27, 1908). A good résumé of the subject is given in a footnote in 105 Am. St. R., 151.[44.]Stafford v. State, 45 So., 673. A Protestant Dictionary, Wright & Neil, and Webster's Dictionary, “Worship.” A Catholic Dictionary, Addis and Arnold, “Latria.”[45.]Gass's App., 73 Pa., 46; 13 Am. Rep., 726; State v. Norris, 59 N. H., 536.[46.]St. Joseph's Church v. Assessors, 12 R. I., 19; 34 Am. R., 597; Gerke v. Purcell, 25 Ohio, 229; Am. & Eng. Ency. of L., “Worship.”[47.]Ante, [28]; Post, [346].[48.]Catholic Catechism.[49.]Sherman v. Baker, 20 R. I., 446; 40 At., 11; 40 L. R. A., 717.[50.]Webster v. Surghow, 69 N. H., 380; 45 At., 139; 48 L. R. A., 100.[51.]Coleman v. O'Leary, 114 Ky., 388; 70 S. W., 1068.[52.]McEntee v. Bonacum, 66 Neb., 651; 92 N. W., 633.[53.]American and English Encyclopedia of Law, “Parishoner.”[54.]Ibid., “Minister”; 7 Cyc, 189, “Clergy.”[55.]Ibid.[56.]Ibid.[57.]Davies v. Beason, 133 U. S., 333; 33 L. Ed., 637.[58.]Simpson v. Welcome, 72 Me., 496.[59.]Board v. Minor, 23 Ohio St., 250.[60.]Baxter v. Langley, 38 L. J., M. C., 1.[61.]Art. vi.[62.]Ex parte Garland, 4 Wallace, 333; 18 L. Ed., 366.[63.]Church of Latter-Day Saints v. U. S., 136 U. S., 1; 34 L. Ed., 478; 140 U. S., 665; 35 L. Ed., 592.[64.]Reynolds v. United States, 8 Otto, 145; 25 L. Ed., 244.[65.]Church of Latter-Day Saints v. U. S., 136 U. S., 1; 34 L. Ed., 478; 140 U. S., 665; 35 L. Ed., 592.[66.]Davis v. Beason, 133 U. S., 333; 33 L. Ed., 637.[67.]Fenelon v. Girard, 2 Howard, 127; 11 L. Ed., 205.[68.]State v. Marble, 72 Ohio St., 21; 73 N. E., 1063; State v. Chenoweth, 163 Ind., 94; 71 N. E., 197; People v. Reetz, 127 Mich, 87; 86 N. W., 396; 59 Cen. L. J., 202; 68 L. R. A., 432.[69.]Thaxter v. Jones, 4 Mass., 570.[70.]Hale v. Everett, 53 N. H., 9.[71.]Federal and State Constitutions, Stimson.[72.]Bradford v. Roberts, 175 U. S., 291; 44 L. Ed., 168; 20 Sup. Ct. R., 121; Municipality of Ponce v. The Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, 28 Sup. Ct. R., 737 (1908).[73.]Terrett v. Taylor, 9 Cranch, 43; 3 L. Ed., 650; Municipality, etc., v. Church, 28 Sup. Ct. R., 737.[74.]Millard v. Board, 19 Ill., 48; Dorner v. Dist., 118 N. W., 353.[75.]Ashby v. Wellington, 25 Mass., 524.[76.]Federal and State Constitutions, Stimson, p. 139; Hale v. Everett, 53 N. H., 9.[77.]State v. Trustees, 11 Ohio, 24.[78.]First v. Leach, 35 Vt., 108.[79.]Federal and State Constitutions, Stimson, p. 139.[80.]State v. District, 76 Wis., 177; 44 N. W., 967; 20 Am. St. R., 41; 7 L. R. A., 330.[81.]Church v. Bullock, 100 S. W. (Tex.), 1025; Millard v. Board, 121 Ill., 297; 10 N. E., 669; Hackett v. Brooksville, 27 Ky. L., 1021; 87 S. W., 792; 69 L. R. A., 592; 61 C. L. J., 49.[82.]Church v. Bullock, 100 S. W., 1025.[83.]Moore v. Monroe, 64 Ia., 367; 20 N. W., 475; 66 L. R. A., 166; 52 Am. R., 444; Pfeiffer v. Board, 118 Mich., 560; 77 N. W., 250; 42 L. R. A., 536.[84.]Hysong v. Gallitzin Borough School, 164 Pa. St., 629; 30 At., 482; 26 L. R. A., 203; Dorner v. School District, 118 N. W., Wis., 353 (Nov. 27, 1908).[85.]O'Connor v. Hendricks, 96 N. Y. S., 161.[86.]Ch. 723, L. 1895.[87.]West v. Otteson, 80 Wis., 62; 49 N. W., 24; Ferraria v. Vasconcellos, 23 Ill., 456; 31 Ill., 25.[88.]Gitzhoffen v. Sisters, 88 Pac., 691; 32 Utah, 46; Trustees v. B. P. O. E., 122 Wis., 452; 100 N. W., 837.[89.]Hermits v. County, 7 Pa. L. J., 124.[90.]Trustees v. Manning, 72 Md., 116; 19 At., 599.[91.]In re Van Horn, 18 R. I., 389.[92.]Wardens v. Blanc, 8 Rob, La., 51.[93.]Rutherford v. Hill, 22 Or., 218; 29 Pac., 546; 17 L. R. A., 549; 56 Cen. L. J., 221; Wechselberg v. Flour, 64 F., 90.[94.]Jewett v. Thames Bank, 16 Conn., 511.[95.]Jeffts v. York, 10 Cushing, 392.[96.]Allen v. M. E. Church, 127 Ia., 96; 102 N. W., 808; 69 L. R. A., 255; Sawyer v. Methodist, 18 Vt., 405.[97.]Wise v. Perpetual Trustees, House of Lords, 57 C. L. J., 104.[98.]Sheehy v. Blake, 77 Wis., 394; 46 N. W., 537; 69 L. R. A., 255.[99.]Clark v. O'Rourke, 111 Mich., 108; 69 N. W., 147.[100.]Bradford v. Cary, 5 Me., 339; Lynch v. Pfeiffer, 110 N. Y., 33; 17 N. E., 402; In re St. Luke's, 17 Philadelphia, 261.[101.]Addison v. Brock, 3 Me., 243.[102.]Stebbins v. Jennings, 10 Pickering, 172.[103.]Municipality of Ponce v. Roman Catholic Church, 28 Sup. Ct. R., 737; 6 Cyc, 915.[104.]Ferraria v. Vasconcellos, 31 Ill., 25; Mason v. Muncaster, 9 Wheaton, 468; 6 L. Ed., 131.[105.]Wheaton v. Gates, 18 N. Y., 395.[106.]South v. Yates, 1 Hoff. N. Y., 142; Miller v. Chittendon, 42 Ia., 252; Newmarket v. Smart, 45 N. H., 87; Evangelical Appeal, 35 Pa. St., 316.[107.]Congregational Society v. Swan, 2 Vt., 222.[108.]Horton v. Baptist Church, 34 Vt., 309.[109.]Associated Reform Church v. Theological Seminary, 4 N. J. Eq., 77.[110.]Taylor v. Edison, 4 Cushing, 522.[111.]Laws of 1895, ch. 723; Religious Corporations, Cummings and Gilbert.[112.]Heiss v. Vosburg, 59 Wis., 532; 18 N. W., 463.[113.]Tartar v. Gibbs, 24 Md., 323.[114.]Christian C. v. C., 219 Ill., 503; 76 N. E., 703.[115.]Jackson v. Legate, 9 Wendell, N. Y., 377.[116.]10 Cyc, 235-244.[117.]Atty-Gen. v. Dutch, 36 N. Y., 452.[118.]Methodist v. Pickett, 23 Barber, 436.[119.]Sutton v. Cole, 8 Mass., 96.[120.]Miller v. English, 21 N. J. L., 317.[121.]Enos v. Church, 187 Mass., 40; 72 N. E., 253.[122.]Baptist v. Wetherell, 3 Paige, N. Y., 296; In re Williams, 105 N. Y. S., 1105; Contra: First R. P. Ch. v. Bowden, 10 Abb., N. C., 1.[123.]Bellports v. Tooker, 29 Barber, N. Y., 256.[124.]Sutter v. First, 42 Pa. St., 503.[125.]Atwater v. Woodbridge, 6 Conn., 223.[126.]Wardens v. Hall, 22 Conn., 125.[127.]Beach, Private Corporations, vol. i, p. 608.[128.]Free Ch. of Scotland v. Overton, Appeal Cases, House of Lords, 1904; Winnebrenner v. Colder, 43 Pa. St., 244.[129.]Rules of Order, Scanlan, c. iii.[130.]Christ's Ev. L. C., 5 Pa. Co. Court, 121.[131.]In re Zion, 8 Kulp. Pa., 239.[132.]In re Hebron, 9 Phil., 609.[133.]U. S. v. Church, 5 Utah, 361, 394, and 538; 15 Pac., 473; 16 Pac., 723; 18 Pac., 35.[134.]Neil v. Vestry, 8 Gill., 116.[135.]Madison v. Baptist, 26 N. Y., 570; Stokes v. Phelps, 47 Hun., 570.[136.]German, etc., 9 Pa. Co. C., 12.[137.]Evenson v. Ellingson, 72 Wis., 242; 39 N. W., 330.[138.]Toby v. Wareham, 54 Mass., 440.[139.]Weber v. Zimmerman, 22 Md., 156; Wyncoop v. Cong., 10 La., 185.[140.]Magie v. German, 13 N. J. Eq., 77.[141.]Esterbrook v. Tillinghast, 71 Mass., 17.[142.]South v. Clapp, 18 Barber, N. Y., 35.[143.]Tilden v. Metcalf, 2 Day, Conn., 259; Heiss v. Vosburg, 59 Wis., 532; 18 N. W., 518.[144.]Keller v. Tracy, 11 Ia., 530.[145.]Verrian v. Methodist, 44 Abbott Pr., 424.[146.]Trustees v. Hoessli, 13 Wis., 348.[147.]Franke v. Mann, 106 Wis., 118; 81 N. W., 1014.[148.]Den. v. Pilling, 24 N. J. L., 653.[149.]Mormon v. United States, 136 U. S., 1; 33 L. Ed., 639.[150.]In re Methodist, 67 Hun., 86.[151.]In re Union, 6 Abb., N. C., 398.[152.]First v. Brownell, 5 Hun., 464.[153.]Evenson v. Ellingson, 72 Wis., 242; 39 N. W., 330.[154.]Rules of Order, Scanlan, 20; Tartar v. Gibbs, 24 Md., 328; Sutter v. First, 42 Pa. St., 503.[155.]Rose v. Vertin, 46 Mich., 457; 9 N. W., 491; Tuigg v. Sheehan, 101 Pa. St., 363.[156.]Am. & Eng. Ency. of L., “Religious Societies.”[157.]Den. v. Bolton, 12 N. J. L., 206.[158.]Bonacum v. Murphy, 65 Neb., 831, and 71 Neb., 463; 98 N. W., 1030; 102 N. W., 267, and 104 N. W., 180.[159.]Bonacum v. Murphy, 71 Neb., 463; 104 N. W., 180; Bowden v. MacLeod, 1 Edw., N. Y., 588.[160.]Congregation v. Martin, 4 Rob., La., 62.[161.]Fitzgerald v. Robinson, 112 Mass., 371; Grosvenor v. United States, 118 Mass., 78; Post, 132.[162.]Wardens v. Blanc, 8 Rob., La., 51.[163.]Bowldin v. Alexander, 82 U. S., 131; 21 L. Ed., 69.[164.]Den. v. Pilling, 24 N. J. L., 653.[165.]Appeal of McAuley, 77 Pa., 397.[166.]Smith v. Swormstedt, 57 U. S., 288; 14 L. Ed., 942.[167.]Skilton v. Webster, Bright, Pa., 203; Mt. Helena Bp. Ch., 79 Miss., 488; 30 So. Rep., 714.[168.]Smith v. Swormstedt, 57 U. S., 288; 14 L. Ed., 942.[169.]Tartar v. Gibbs, 24 Md., 323; Papalion v. Manusos, 113 Ill. App., 316.[170.]People v. Steele, 2 Barber, 397.[171.]Stebbins v. Jennings, 10 Pickering, 172.[172.]Elizabeth City v. Kennedy, Bush, 44, N. C. Law, 89.[173.]Diffendorf v. Reformed Church, 20 Johns., N. Y., 12.[174.]Sutton v. Trustees, 42 Pa., 503.[175.]Baxter v. McDonald, 155 N. Y., 83; 49 N. E., 667.[176.]Wardens v. Blanc, 8 Rob., 51.[177.]Young v. Ransom, 31 Barb., 49.[178.]Perry v. Wheeler, 75 Ky., 541.[179.]Sheldon v. Easton, 4 Mass., 281; Congregation v. Peres, 42 Tenn., 620; Thompson v. Catholic, 22 Mass., 469.[180.]Proprietors v. Proprietors, 48 Mass., 496.[181.]Dempsey v. North, 98 Mich., 444; 57 N. W., 267.[182.]Hackett v. Mt. Pleasant, 46 Ark., 291.[183.]Chatard v. O'Donovan, 80 Ind., 20.[184.]Brestor v. Burr, 120 N. Y., 427; 8 L. R. A., 710; 24 N. E., 937.[185.]Walker v. Wainwright, 16 Barb., 486.[186.]O'Hara v. Stack, 90 Pa., 477.[187.]Stack v. O'Hara, 98 Pa. St., 213.[188.]Cooper v. McKenna, 104 Mass., 284.[189.]Leahy v. Williams, 141 Mass., 345.[190.]State v. Winkle, 14 N. H., 480.[191.]Methodist v. Sherman, 36 Wis., 404.[192.]Baldwin v. McKlinch, 1 Me., 102.[193.]Elizabeth City v. Kennedy, 44 N. C., 89.[194.]Calkins v. Cheney, 92 Ill., 463.[195.]St. Patrick's v. Daly, 116 Ill., 76; 4 N. E., 241.[196.]Congregation v. Martin, 4 Rob., La., 62.[197.]Meyer v. Baptist, 38 Vt., 614.[198.]Congregation v. Martin, 4 Rob., 62.[199.]Whittmore v. Fourth, 68 Mass., 306.[200.]St. Patrick's v. Daly, 4 N. E., 241; 116 Ill., 76.[201.]Tuigg v. Treacy, 104 Pa., 493.[202.]Tartar v. Gibbs, 24 Md., 323.[203.]Heiss v. Murphy, 40 Wis., 276, 278; Den. v. Pilling, 24 N. J. L., 653.[204.]Weckerly v. Geyer, 11 Ser. R. Pa., 35.[205.]Weinbrenner v. Colder, 43 Pa. St., 244.[206.]People v. Tuthil, 31 N. Y., 550.[207.]Price v. Lyon, 14 Conn., 280.[208.]Suter v. Spangler, 4 Phil., 331.[209.]Smith v. Pedigo, 145 Ind., 36; 32 L. R. A., 836; 33 N. E., 777.[210.]McGuire v. Trustees, 54 Hun., 207.[211.]Church v. Halverson, 42 Minn., 503; 44 N. W., 563; Day v. Bolton, 12 N. J. L., 206; Den. v. Pilling, 24 N. J. L., 653.[212.]Osgood v. Bradley, 7 Me., 411.[213.]Baptist v. Witherell, 24 Am. Dec., 223; 3 The Catholic Cyclopedia, 755; Contra: First R. P. Ch. v. Bowden, 10 Abb., N. C, 1. See post [134], [156].[214.]Jewett v. Thames, 16 Conn., 511.[215.]Chick v. Trevett, 20 Me., 462; Allen v. M. E. Church, 127 Ia., 96; 102 N. W., 808; 69 L. R. A., 255.[216.]Sheehy v. Blake, 72 Wis., 411; 39 N. W., 479; 9 L. R. A., 564.[217.]Chase v. Merrimac, 34 Mass., 564; Bigelow v. Congregation, 15 Vt., 370.[218.]Richardson v. Butterfield, 60 Mass., 191.[219.]State v. Hebrew, 31 La. Ann., 205; 33 Am. Rep., 217; Grosvenor v. United States, 118 Mass., 78; Watson v. Garbin, 54 Mo., 358.[220.]State v. Getty, 69 Conn., 286; 37 At., 188.[221.]Free Church of Scotland v. Overton, Appeal Cases, House of Lords, 1904; Fuchs v. Meisel, 102 Mich., 357; 32 L. R. A., 92; 60 N. W., 773.[222.]Methodist v. Wood, 5 Ohio, 12.[223.]McGinnis v. Watson, 41 Pa. St., 9.[224.]German v. Seibert, 3 Pa. St., 282.[225.]Sutter v. First, 42 Pa. St., 503.[226.]Miller v. Gable, 2 Den., N. Y., 492; Eis v. Croze, 149 Mich., 62; 112 N. W., 943; Dressen v. Brameier, 56 Ia., 756; 9 N. W., 193; Amish v. Gelhaus, 71 Ia., 170; 32 N. W., 318.[227.]Lamm v. Cain, 129 Ind., 486; 14 L. R. A., 518.[228.]Fernald v. Lewis, 6 Me., 264.[229.]Trustees v. Henschell, 48 Minn., 494; 51 N. W., 477.[230.]Perry v. Tupper, 74 N. C., 722.[231.]Wanner v. Emanuel, 174 Pa., 466.[232.]West v. Ottesen, 80 Wis., 62; 49 N. W., 24.[233.]Second v. First, 23 Conn., 255.[234.]Smith v. Swormstedt, 57 U. S., 288; 14 L. Ed., 942.[235.]Nelson v. Benson, 69 Ill., 27; Brown v. Porter, 10 Mass., 93.[236.]Page v. Crosby, 41 Mass., 211.[237.]Harper v. Straws, 53 Ky., 48; Hale v. Everett, 53 N. H., 9; Wiswell v. First, 14 Ohio St., 31; Reorganized v. Church, 60 Fed., 937; 32 L. R. A., 838; Fernstler v. Seibert, 114 Pa., 196; 6 At., 165.[238.]Shannon v. First, 42 Ky., 253.[239.]Servatius v. Pichel, 34 Wis., 292; McGrath v. Finn, 16 Alb. L. J., 186; Morasse v. Borchee, 151 Mass., 567; 25 N. E., 74.[240.]Farnsworth v. Storrs, 59 Mass., 412.[241.]Bowldin v. Alexander, 15 Wall., 131; 21 L. Ed., 69; Ante, sec. 116, post 156.[242.]In re Paulson's will, 127 Wis., 612; 107 N. W., 484.[243.]Barry v. C. K. of W., 119 Wis., 362; 96 N. W., 797.[244.]In re Knox, 25 Ch. Div., 542.[245.]Harden v. Baptist, 51 Mich., 137; 16 N. W., 311.[246.]Taylor v. Edison, 58 Mass., 522; Gray v. Christian, 137 Mass., 329.[247.]Fulbright v. Higgenbotham, 133 Mo., 668; 34 S. W., 875.[248.]Jones v. State, 28 Neb., 495; 44 N. W., 658; 7 L. R. A., 325.[249.]Hamel v. German, 1 Weekly Note Cases, 411.[250.]State v. Hebrew, 31 La. Ann., 205; 33 Am. Rep., 217.[251.]Deadrick v. Lampson, 58 Tenn., 523.[252.]Smith v. Pedigo, 145 Ind., 361; 32 L. R. A., 838.[253.]Lucas v. Case, 9 Bush, Ky., 297.[254.]Grosvenor v. U. S., 118 Mass., 78.[255.]Miller v. English, 21 N. J. L., 317; 10 Cyc, 320-328; Rules of Order, Scanlan, 17.[256.]State v. Crowell, 9 N. J. L., 391; Commonwealth v. Cain, 5 Ser. & R., Pa., 510.[257.]Wegerle v. Geyer, 11 Ser. & R., Pa., 35.[258.]Juker v. Commonwealth, 20 Pa. St., 484; St. Luke's v. Matthews, 4 Desau, S. C., 578; State v. Crowell, 9 N. J. L., 391.[259.]People v. Tuthill, 31 N. Y., 550.[260.]Rules of Order, Scanlan, 18, 20; 10 Cyc, 329.[261.]Madison v. Baptist, 32 Howard's Pr., 335.[262.]People v. Tuthill, 31 N. Y., 550.[263.]Hart v. Harvey, 32 Barb., N. Y., 55.[264.]Alexander v. Bowers, 79 S. W., 342.[265.]Rules of Order, Scanlan, 18, 20, 23; People v. Peck, 11 Wend., N. Y., 604.[266.]Rules of Order, Scanlan, 9; Gipson v. Morris, 83 S. W., Tex., 226; McCrary's Am. L. of Elections, secs. 298-300.[267.]Juker v. Commonwealth, 20 Pa., 484.[268.]Rules of Order, Scanlan, 23-27; Wardens v. Pope, 8 Gray, Mass., 140.[269.]Den. v. Pilling, 24 N. J. L., 653.[270.]Vestry v. Matthews, 4 Desau, S. C., 578.[271.]Cooley's Con. Lim., 619; McCrary's Am. L. of Elections, sec. 197; Rules of Order, Scanlan, 24-27.[272.]Commonwealth v. Woelper, 3 Ser. & R., Pa., 29.[273.]In re Peters, 112 N. Y. Sup., 339.[274.]Gram v. Prussia, 36 N. Y., 161.[275.]Wall v. Johnson, 140 Ind., 445; 39 N. E., 251; Simmons v. Allison, 118 N. C., 763.[276.]People v. St. Anthony, 109 N. Y., 512; 17 N. E., 408.[277.]Congregation v. Martin, 4 Rob., 62; Wardens v. Blanc, 8 Rob., 51; St. Andrew's Ch. v. Schaugnessy, 63 Neb., 792; 89 N. W., 261.[278.]Enos v. Church, 187 Mass., 40; 72 N. E., 253.[279.]Ross v. Crockett, 14 La. Ann., 811.[280.]Laight v. Noe, 12 Howard's Pr., 497; Contra: In re Williams, 105 N. Y. S., 1105; Ante, 116, 134.[281.]People v. Lacoste, 37 N. Y., 192; Fadness v. Braunberg, 73 Wis., 257; 41 N. W., 84; McCrary on Am. L. of Elections, secs. 209, 264; 10 Cyc, 347; People v. Nappa, 89 Mich., 232; 50 N. W., 846.[282.]Hendrickson v. Shotwell, 1 N. J. Eq., 577.[283.]Congregation v. Sperry, 10 Conn., 200; 10 Cyc, 319.[284.]Den. v. Pilling, 24 N. J. L., 653.[285.]Smith v. Erb, 5 Gill., Md., 437.[286.]People v. Peck, 11 Wend., N. Y., 604.[287.]Catron v. First, 46 Ia., 106; People v. St. Anthony's, 109 N. Y., 512; 17 N. E., 408.[288.]Columbia v. Gospel, 127 N. Y., 361.[289.]First v. Caughey, 85 Pa., 271.[290.]San Antonia v. Adams, 87 Tex., 125; 26 S. W., 1040; Hill v. Rich, 119 Mo., 9; 24 S. W., 223.[291.]Hewitt v. Wheeler, 22 Conn., 577; Devos v. Gray, 22 Ohio, 159; Klopp v. Moore, 6 Kan., 27; Neil v. Spencer, 5 Ill. App., 461; United v. Vandusen, 37 Wis., 54.[292.]Miller v. Church, 4 Phil., 48.[293.]Brunnenmeyer v. Buhre, 32 Ill., 183.[294.]N. Baptist v. Parker, 36 Barb., N. Y., 171.[295.]Dennison v. Austin, 15 Wis., 334.[296.]United v. Vandusen, 37 Wis., 54; MacLaury v. Hart, 121 N. Y., 636; 24 N. E., 1013.[297.]Vestry v. Barksdale, 1 Strobb. Eq., S. C., 197.[298.]New v. Gress, 89 Ga., 125.[299.]10 Cyc, 776-9; In re Denny, 156 Ind., 104; 59 N. E., 359; 51 L. R. A., 722.[300.]Rules of Order, Scanlan, 21; U. S. v. Balm, 144 U. S., 1; 12 Sup. Ct. R., 507; 36 L. Ed., 321; The Catholic Cyclopedia, vol. i, 289.[301.]Cicotte v. Anciaux, 53 Mich., 227; 18 N. W., 793.[302.]Trustees v. Halverson, 42 Minn., 503; 44 N. W., 663.[303.]Skinner v. Richardson, 76 Wis., 464; 45 N. W., 318; Dennison v. Auston, 15 Wis., 334.[304.]Vestry v. Barksdale, 1 Strobb. S. C. Eq., 197.[305.]State v. Ahnapee, 99 Wis., 322; 74 N. W., 783.[306.]Bowldin v. Alexander, 82 U. S., 131; 21 L. Ed., 69; The Catholic Cyclopedia, vol. iii, 755, 756.[307.]Leahy v. Williams, 141 Mass., 345; 6 N. E., 78.[308.]People v. Runkel, 8 Johnson, N. Y., 464.[309.]Leahy v. Williams, 141 Mass., 345.[310.]Rose v. Vertin, 46 Mich., 457; 9 N. W., 491; Tuigg v. Sheehan, 101 Pa., 363.[311.]Freeport v. Egan, 146 Pa., 106; 23 At., 390.[312.]Scott v. Thompson, 21 Ia., 599.[313.]Emonds v. Termehr, 60 Ia., 92; 14 N. W., 197.[314.]Wojcienchowski v. Johnknowski, 16 Pa. Sup. Ct., 444.[315.]Chiniqui v. Delaire, 37 Ill., 237.[316.]St. Patrick's v. Abst., 76 Ill., 252.[317.]First v. Prior, 23 Hun., 271.[318.]Den. v. Pilling, 24 N. J. L., 653; Rules of Order, Scanlan, 15-18.[319.]German v. Pressler, 17 La. Ann., 127.[320.]Appeal of McAuley, 77 Pa., 397.[321.]Bethany v. Sperry, 10 Conn., 200.[322.]Weber v. Zimmermann, 22 Md., 156.[323.]Downs v. Bowdoin, 149 Mass., 135; 21 N. E., 294.[324.]Smith v. Erb., 4 Gill., Md., 437.[325.]Helbig v. Rosenberg, 86 Ia., 159; 53 N. W., 111.[326.]Dahl v. Palache, 68 Cal., 248.[327.]People v. Runkel, 9 Johnson, 147.[328.]First v. Hillary, 51 Cal., 155.[329.]Tuttle v. Cary, 7 Me., 426.[330.]State v. Steward, 6 Houst., Del., 9.[331.]Jones v. Cary, 6 Me., 448; Rules of Order, Scanlan, 29-30.[332.]State v. Steward, 6 Houst., Del., 359.[333.]Juker v. Commonwealth, 20 Pa., 484; McIlvain v. Christ's Church, 8 Phil., 507.[334.]Livingston v. Trinity Church, 45 N. J. L., 230.[335.]People v. Tuthill, 31 N. Y., 550.[336.]Madison v. Baptist, 46 N. Y., 131.[337.]Moore v. St. Thomas' Church, 4 Abb., N. Y., 51.[338.]Commonwealth v. Woelper, 3 Ser. & R., 29.[339.]Wardens v. Pope, 74 Mass., 140.[340.]Oakes v. Hill, 6 Weekly Notes, Cas., 346.[341.]Hartt v. Harvey, 32 Barb., 55.[342.]Weckerly v. Geyer, 11 Ser. & R., 35.[343.]People v. Church, 48 Barb., 603.[344.]Allen v. Gray, 11 Conn., 95.[345.]Arthur v. Norfield, 49 At., 241; 73 Conn., 718.[346.]Pepin v. Societies, 23 R. I., 81; 60 L. R. A., 626.[347.]Lahiff v. St. Joseph's T. A. B. S., 76 Conn., 648; 65 L. R. A., 92.[348.]10 Cyc, 1067.[349.]17 Cyc, 405; 2 Jones on Ev., secs. 522, 523; Conflict of L., Wharton, vol. ii, sec. 761, pp. 1496-8; Collins v. German, Am. M. I. Ass., 112 Mo. App., 209; 86 S. W., 891; Layton v. Kraft, 98 N. Y., 996.[350.]Collins v. German, 112 Mo. App., 209; Sandberg v. The State, 113 Wis., 578; 89 N. W., 504.[351.]Sawyer v. Baldwin, 11 Pickering, 492.[352.]Finher v. Hanegen, 59 Ark., 151; 24 L. R. A., 543.[353.]Mt. Zion v. Whitmore, 83 Ia., 138; 49 N. W., 846; 13 L. R. A., 198.[354.]Bonacum v. Murphy, 65 Neb., 831; 98 N. W., 1030; 71 Neb., 463; 102 N. W., 267; 104 ib., 180; Nance v. Busby, 91 Tenn., 303; 18 S. W., 874; 15 L. R. A., 801.[355.]Bonacum v. Harrington, 65 Neb., 831; 91 N. W., 886.[356.]Tubbs v. Lynch, 4 Harr., Del., 521.[357.]Sterns v. Bedford, 21 Pickering, 114.[358.]O'Donovan v. Chatard, 97 Ind., 421.[359.]Baxter v. McDonald, 155 N. Y., 83; 49 N. E., 667.[360.]Gibbs v. Gilead, 38 Conn., 153.[361.]Stack v. O'Hara, 98 Pa., 213.[362.]29 Cyc, 204, and “Religious Societies”; Am. & Eng. Cyc. of L., “Religious Societies” and “Beneficial Societies”; 2 Benefit Societies & L. Insurance, Bacon, secs. 400a and 450a.[363.]Farnsworth v. Storrs, 59 Mass., 412.[364.]Hatfield v. Delong, 24 Ind. App., 343; 51 L. R. A., 751; Ryan v. Cudahy, 157 Ill., 108; 41 N. E., 760; 49 L. R. A., 353.[365.]Sampsell v. Esher, 26 Weekly Law Bulletin, Ohio, 156.[366.]Day v. Robinson, 12 N. J. L., 206.[367.]Diffendorf v. Reformed Church, 20 Johnson, N. Y., 12.[368.]Chase v. Cheney, 58 Ill., 509.[369.]Catholic Dictionary, Addis & Arnold, “Prescription.”[370.]Legal Formulary, Baart, 462.[371.]Juker v. Commonwealth, 20 Pa. St., 484.[372.]Beers v. Arkansas, 20 How., U. S., 527; 15 L. Ed., 991.[373.]See “Benefit of the Clergy” and “Forum Ecclesiasticum,” in The Catholic Cyclopedia and in the Catholic Dictionary.[374.]Kuns v. Robinson, 154 Ill., 394; 40 N. E., 343; Brundage v. Deardorf, 55 Fed., 839; Watson v. Jones, 80 U. S., 679; 20 L. Ed., 666; Bird v. St. Mark's, 62 Ia., 567; 17 N. W., 747; Perry v. Wheeler, 75 Ky., 541; Powers v. Bundy, 45 Neb., 208; 63 N. W., 476; Connit v. Reformed, 54 N. Y., 551; Harrison v. Hoyle, 24 Ohio St., 254; Krecker v. Shirey, 163 Pa., 534; 30 At., 540.[375.]Watson v. Jones, 80 U. S., 679; 20 L. Ed., 666.[376.]Prickett v. Wells, 117 Mo., 502; 24 S. W., 52; Pounder v. Ash, 36 Neb., 564; 54 N. W., 847.[377.]Atty-Gen. v. Fed., 69 Mass., 1.[378.]Mt. Helen v. Jones, 79 Miss., 488; 30 So., 714.[379.]Prickett v. Wells, 117 Mo., 502; 24 S. W., 52.[380.]Ferraria v. Vasconcellos, 31 Ill., 25.[381.]Garten v. Penick, 68 Ky., 110.[382.]Brunnenmeyer v. Buhre, 31 Ill., 183.[383.]Lawson v. Kolbenson, 61 Ill., 405.[384.]Robertson v. Bullions, 11 N. Y., 243.[385.]Papalion v. Manusos, 113 Ill. App., 316.[386.]Avery v. Baker, 27 Neb., 388; 43 N. W., 174.[387.]Trustees v. Trustees, 4 N. J. Eq., 77.[388.]Nash v. Sutton, 117 N. C., 231; 23 S. E., 178; Wiswell v. First, 14 Ohio St., 31.[389.]Mannix v. Purcell, 46 Ohio St., 102.[390.]Baker v. Ducker, 79 Cal., 365; 21 Pac., 764.[391.]Morris v. Dart, 67 S. C., 338; 45 S. E., 753; 100 Am. St. Rep., 734.[392.]Phipps v. Jones, 20 Pa., 260.[393.]Dolan v. City, 4 Gill., 394.[394.]Shakers v. Watson, 68 Fed., 730.[395.]61 Cen. L. J., 49 and 55; 57 C. L. J., 201.[396.]Owens v. Frank, 7 Wyoming, 457; 53 Pac., 282; 47 Cen. L. J., 221.[397.]Evidence, Jones, vol. iii, p. 776.[398.]Gillooley v. State, 58 Ind., 182.[399.]Knight v. Lee, 80 Ind., 201.[400.]Colbert v. State, 125 Wis., 423; 104 N. W., 61.[401.]Hills v. State, 61 Neb., 589; 85 N. W., 836.[402.]Bevins v. Kline, 21 Ind., 37.[403.]In re Thomas, 54 Cal., 509.[404.]Rex. v. Hoy, 2 F. & F., 4.[405.]Rex. v. Griffen, 6 Cox, C. C., 219.[406.]Mutual v. Robinson, 19 U. S. App., 266; State v. Morgan, 196 Mo., 177; 95 S. W., 402.[407.]Katzer v. City, 104 Wis., 16; 79 N. W., 745; 80 N. W., 41.[408.]Vasconcellos v. Ferraria, 27 Ill., 237.[409.]Foley v. Brocksmit, 119 Ia., 457; 93 N. W., 344; 97 Am. St. R., 324; 60 L. R. A., 571; 18 Cyc, 437-9.[410.]Harriman v. First, 63 Ga., 186.[411.]Methodist v. Sherman, 36 Wis., 404.[412.]St. Patrick's v. Daly, 116 Ill., 76; 4 N. E., 241.[413.]Eager v. Inhabitants, 10 Mass., 430.[414.]Barnes v. Perrine, 9 Barb., N. Y., 202; Sheehy v. Blake, 77 Wis., 394; 46 N. W., 537; 69 L. R. A., 255; Cutler v. Thomas, 25 Vt., 13; Allen v. M. E. Church, 127 Ia., 96; 102 N. W., 808; 69 L. R. A., 255 Note.[415.]9 Cyc, 331.[416.]45 Cent. Dig., 7.[417.]45 Cent. Dig., 38.[418.]45 Cent. Dig., 14.[419.]45 Cent. Dig., 1-54; Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, “Subscriptions.”[420.]Legal Maxims, Broom, 745; Hodges v. Nalty, 104 Wis., 464; 80 N. W., 726.[421.]Hodges v. Nalty, 113 Wis., 557; 89 N. W., 535; Hodges v. O'Brien, 113 Wis., 97; 88 N. W., 901.[422.]Barnes v. Perine, 9 Bar., N. Y., 202.[423.]Macon v. Shepard, 2 Humphrey, Tenn., 335.[424.]O'Hear v. De Goesbriand, 33 Vt., 593; 80 Am. Dec., 662.[425.]Bates v. Sperrell, 10 Mass., 323; Hodges v. Green, 28 Vt., 358; Pres. v. Andrus, 21 N. J. L., 225.[426.]Church v. Wells, 24 Pa., 249.[427.]O'Hear v. De Goesbriand, 33 Vt., 593; 80 Am. Dec., 662.[428.]Proprietors v. Roswell, 66 Me., 400; Sohier v. Trinity, 109 Mass., 1; Aylward v. O'Brien, 160 Mass., 118; 35 N. E., 313; 22 L. R. A., 206.[429.]Aylward v. O'Brien, 160 Mass., 118; 35 N. E., 313; 22 L. R. A., 206; O'Hear v. De Goesbriand, 33 Vt., 593; 80 Am. Dec., 662.[430.]Smith v. Bonhoff, 2 Mich., 115.[431.]Vorhees v. Presbyterian, 8 Barb., 135.[432.]Price v. Lyon, 14 Conn., 280.[433.]Baptist v. Witherell, 3 Paige, N. Y., 296; 24 Am. Dec., 223.[434.]Perrin v. Granger, 33 Vt., 101.[435.]French v. Old, 106 Mass., 479.[436.]Curry v. First, 2 Pittsburg, 105.[437.]Succession of Gambla, 23 La. Ann., 9.[438.]First v. Braydon, 91 Mass., 248.[439.]Downs v. Bowdoin, 149 Mass., 135; 21 N. E., 294.[440.]Trustees v. Quackenbush, 10 Johnson, 217.[441.]Kellogg v. Dickenson, 18 Vt., 266.[442.]Jackson v. Rounsville, 5 Metcalf, Mass., 127.[443.]Murray v. Cargill, 32 Me., 517; Gay v. Baker, 17 Mass., 435; Shaw v. Beveridge, 3 Hill, N. Y., 26; Perrin v. Granger, 33 Vt., 101.[444.]Vanhorn v. Tailmadge, 8 N. J. Eq., 108.[445.]Fassett v. Boylston, 19 Pickering, Mass., 361.[446.]Kimball v. Rowley, 24 Pickering, Mass., 347.[447.]Aylward v. O'Brien, 160 Mass., 118; 35 N. E., 313; 22 L. R. A., 206; Van Houten v. Trustees, 17 N. J. Eq., 126.[448.]Howard v. Stevens, 47 Vt., 262.[449.]Stoddard v. Vestry, 2 Gill. & J., Md., 227.[450.]City v. McIntyre, 8 Rob., La., 467.[451.]Sargent v. Pierce, 43 Mass., 80.[452.]Perrin v. Leverett, 13 Mass., 128.[453.]Crowley v. Miller, 19 N. Y. Weekly Dig., 262.[454.]Sheldon v. Vail, 28 Hun., 354.[455.]Price v. Lyons, 14 Conn., 280.[456.]Perrin v. Granger, 33 Vt., 101.[457.]Commonwealth v. Cain, 5 Srg. & R., Pa., 510.[458.]In re Bullock, 6 Dem. Sur., 335; Heiss v. Murphy, 40 Wis., 276; Ruth v. Oberbrunner, 40 Wis., 238.[459.]Ruth v. Oberbrunner, 40 Wis., 238; Goesele v. Bimeler, 55 U. S., 589; 14 L. Ed., 554; Van Houten v. Trustees, 17 N. J. Eq., 126.[460.]Winnepesaukee v. Gordon, 63 N. H., 505; 3 At., 426.[461.]Bethel v. Carmack, 2 Md., Ch., 143; Tartar v. Gibbs, 24 Md., 323.[462.]Lynch v. Pfeiffer, 110 N. Y., 33; 17 N. E., 402.[463.]Enos v. Chestnut, 88 Ill., 590.[464.]Walwrath v. Camel, 28 Mich., 111.[465.]Harpending v. Reformed, 41 U. S., 455; 10 L. Ed., 1029.[466.]Inhabitants v. Catholics, 40 Mass., 139; People v. Trinity, 22 N. Y., 44.[467.]Lynch v. Pfeiffer, 110 N. Y., 33; 17 N. E., 402; Eggleston v. Doolittle, 33 Conn., 396.[468.]Tomlin v. Blunt, 31 Ill. App., 234.[469.]Centenary v. Parker, 43 N. J. Eq., 307; 12 At., 142.[470.]Levasseur v. Martin, 11 La. Ann., 684.[471.]O'Donnell v. Holden, 21 Weekly Law Bulletin, 254.[472.]Walwrath v. Camel, 28 Mich., 111.[473.]Fitzpatrick v. Fitzgerald, 79 Mass., 400.[474.]Hubbard v. German, 34 Ia., 31.[475.]In re First, 106 N. Y., 251; 12 N. E., 626; Wiswell v. First, 14 Ohio St., 31.[476.]Scott v. First, 50 Mich., 528; 15 N. W., 891.[477.]In re First, 106 N. Y., 251; 12 N. E., 626.[478.]Katzer v. City of Milwaukee, 104 Wis., 16; 79 N. W., 745; 80 N. W., 41.[479.]Beckwith v. St. Phillip's Parish, 69 Ga., 564.[480.]Miller v. Chittenden, 2 Ia., 315; 4 Ia., 252; Schenectady v. Veeder, 4 Wendell, N. Y., 494.[481.]St. Patrick's v. Daly, 116 Ill., 76.[482.]Nobilli v. Redman, 6 Cal., 325.[483.]San Antonio v. Odin, 15 Tex., 539.[484.]Blair v. Odin, 3 Tex., 288.[485.]Heiss v. Vosburg, 59 Wis., 532; 18 N. W., 463.[486.]Santillan v. Moses, 1 Cal., 92.[487.]Heiss v. Murphy, 40 Wis., 276.[488.]Robertson v. Bullions, 11 N. Y., 243.[489.]Hennessey v. Walsh, 55 N. H., 515.[490.]Pawlet v. Clarke, 13 U. S., 292; 3 L. Ed., 735.[491.]Cheever v. Pierson, 33 Mass., 266.[492.]Amish v. Gelhaus, 71 Ia., 170; 32 N. W., 318.[493.]Cushman v. Church, 162 Pa., 280; 29 At., 472.[494.]Kulinsky v. Dambrowski, 29 Wis., 109.[495.]Reed v. Church, 6 Pa. Co. Ct., 76.[496.]Fulbright v. Higgenbotham, 133 Mo., 668; 34 S. W., 875; People v. Runkel, 9 Johnson, 147; Central v. Patterson, 30 N. Y. Supp., 248; Unangst v. Shortz, 5 Horton, Pa., 506.[497.]Bowden v. MacLeod, 1 Edw., N. Y., 588; Gable v. Miller, 10 Paige, N. Y., 627; Wilson v. Johns, 2 Rich., S. C., Eq., 192; Ferraria v. Vasconcellos, 31 Ill., 25.[498.]Antones v. Eslava's heirs, 9 Port., 527.[499.]Ferraria v. Vasconcellos, 31 Ill., 25; Brunnenmeyer v. Buhre, 32 Ill., 183.[500.]Organ v. Seaford, 1 Dev., N. C. Eq., 453; Post 290, 319.[501.]Gram v. Prussia, 36 N. Y., 161; Reformed v. Draper, 97 Mass., 349.[502.]Dochkus v. Lithuanian, 206 Pa., 25; 55 At., 779.[503.]Burke v. Wall, 29 La. Ann., 38.[504.]Thompson v. West, 59 Neb., 677; 82 N. W., 13; 49 L. R. A., 337.[505.]Morgan v. Leslie, Wright, O., 144.[506.]Consistory v. Brandow, 52 Barb., N. Y., 228.[507.]Grisson v. Hill, 17 Ark., 483.[508.]Scott v. Stipe, 12 Ind., 74; Mills v. Davison, 54 N. J. Eq., 659; 35 At., 1072; 35 L. R. A., 113.[509.]Appeal of Tappen, 52 Conn., 412.[510.]Neely v. Hoskins, 84 Me., 386; 24 At., 882.[511.]Second v. Dugan, 65 Md., 460; 5 At., 415.[512.]Craig v. Inhabitants, 58 Me., 479.[513.]Beckwith v. St. Phillip's Church, 68 Ga., 564.[514.]Mannix v. Purcell, 46 Ohio St., 102; 19 N. E., 572; 2 L. R. A., 753.[515.]Draper v. Minor, 36 Mo., 290.[516.]Burton's Appeal, 57 Pa. St., 213.[517.]Smith v. Pedigo, 145 Ind., 361; 33 N. E., 777; 44 N. E., 363; 32 L. R. A., 838.[518.]Free Ch. of Scotland v. Overton, Appeal Cases, House of Lords, 1904; McGinnis v. Watson, 41 Pa. St., 9; Ante, 278.[519.]First v. Rauss, 21 Conn., 160; Watson v. Jones, 13 Wallace, 679; 20 L. Ed., 666.[520.]App. v. Lutheran, 6 Pa. St., 201.[521.]Keller v. Tracy, 11 Ia., 530; Happy v. Morton, 33 Ill., 398; Leftwig v. Thornton, 18 Ia., 56.[522.]Watson v. Jones, 13 Wallace, 679; 20 L. Ed., 666.[523.]Dolan v. Mayor, 4 Gill., Md., 394.[524.]Goode v. McPherson, 51 Mo., 126.[525.]Olcott v. Gabert, 86 Tex., 121; 23 S. W., 985.[526.]Strong v. Doty, 32 Wis., 381.[527.]Fadness v. Braunburg, 73 Wis., 257; 41 N. W., 84.[528.]Weld v. May, 9 Cushing, Mass., 181.[529.]Field v. Field, 9 Wendell, N. Y., 394; Stokes v. Dale, 14 N. Y., 901.[530.]Hendrickson v. Shotwell, 1 N. J. Eq., 577; Calkins v. Cheney, 92 Ill., 463; Park v. Chaplain, 96 Ia., 55; 64 N. W., 674.[531.]Beech v. Allen, 7 Hun., 441.[532.]Catholic v. Gibbons, 3 Weekly Law Bulletin, 581.[533.]Lyons v. Planters, 86 Ga., 485.[534.]African v. Duru, 19 La. Ann., 302; Harrisburg v. Washburn, 29 Oregon, 150; 44 Pac., 390.[535.]Lynn v. Carson, 32 Grat., Va., 170.[536.]Proprietor v. Butler, 56 Mass., 597.[537.]DeRuyter v. St. Peter's, 3 N. Y., 238.[538.]Perrian v. Methodist, 4 Abbot's Pr., N. Y., 424; Unangst v. Shortz, 5 Horton, Pa. St., 506; Trustees v. Hoessli, 13 Wis., 348.[539.]Miller v. Chittenden, 2 Ia., 315; Church v. Grace, 68 N. Y., 570; Gilmer v. Stone, 120 U. S., 586; 30 L. Ed., 734; Kinney v. Kinney's Executors, 86 Ky., 610; 6 S. W., 593.[540.]St. Peter's v. German, 104 Ill., 440.[541.]Kinney v. Kinney's Executors, 86 Ky., 610; 6 S. W., 593.[542.]Trustees v. Manning, 72 Md., 116; 19 At., 599.[543.]Morgan v. Leslie, Wright, 144.[544.]U. S. v. Church, 5 Utah, 361; 15 Pac., 473.[545.]In re Ticknor's estate, 13 Mich., 44; Levy v. Levy, 33 N. Y., 97.[546.]Trustees v. Hilkin, 84 Md., 170; 35 At., 9.[547.]Hamsher v. Hamsher, 132 Ill., 273; 23 N. E., 1123; 8 L. R. A., 556.[548.]Hanson v. Little Sisters, 79 Md., 434; 32 At., 1052; Jones v. Habersham, 107 U. S., 174; 27 L. Ed., 401.[549.]Church v. Grace, 68 N. Y., 570.[550.]Tartar v. Gibbs, 24 Md., 323.[551.]Trinitarian v. Union, 61 N. H., 384.[552.]Smith v. Pedigo, 145 Ind., 361; 44 N. E., 363; 32 L. R. A., 838.[553.]Miller v. English, 21 N. J. L., 317.[554.]Petot v. Tucker, 21 N. Y., 267.[555.]Ludlam v. Higbee, 11 N. J. Eq., 342.[556.]Happy v. Morton, 33 Ill., 398.[557.]Sutor v. Spangler, 4 Phil., 331.[558.]Scott v. Stipe, 12 Ind., 74.[559.]Commonwealth v. Dougherty, 107 Mass., 243.[560.]In re Wright's estate, Myr. Prob., 213 Cal.[561.]Green v. Dennis, 6 Conn., 293; Ferguson v. Hedges, 1 Harr., 524.[562.]Murphy v. Dallam, 1 Bland, 529.[563.]Festorazzi v. St. Joseph's, 104 Ala., 327; 18 So., 394; 25 L. R. A., 360; Ex parte Schuler, 134 Mass., 436; Seiber's Appeal, 9 At., Pa., 863; Holland v. Alcock, 108 N. Y., 312; 16 N. E., 305.[564.]Festorazzi v. St. Joseph's, 104 Ala., 327; 18 So., 394; 25 L. R. A., 360.[565.]McHugh v. McCole, 97 Wis., 166; 72 N. W., 352.[566.]Wilson v. Perry, 29 W. Va., 169; 1 S. E., 302.[567.]Jones v. Habersham, 107 U. S., 174; 27 L. Ed., 401.[568.]Good v. Zook, 116 Ia., 582; 88 N. W., 376.[569.]Trustees v. Sturgeon, 9 Pa. St., 321.[570.]Scott v. Curle, 9 B. Mon., 17; Ante, 278, 290.[571.]In re Paulson's will, 127 Wis., 612; 107 N. W., 484.[572.]Robertson v. Bullions, 11 N. Y., 243.[573.]62 Cen. L. J., 167.[574.]Ould v. Washington, 95 U. S., 303; 24 L. Ed., 450.[575.]Jones v. Habersham, 107 U. S., 174; 27 L. Ed., 401.[576.]Darcy v. Kelley, 153 Mass., 433; 26 N. E., 1110.[577.]Bronson v. Strouse, 57 Conn., 147; 17 At., 699.[578.]Tichenor v. Brewer's, 98 Ky., 349; 33 S. W., 86.[579.]Banker v. Phelan, 4 Barb., 80.[580.]Bowers v. Fromm, Add., Pa., 362.[581.]Germania v. Baltes, 113 Ill., 29.[582.]McDonald v. Shaw, 98 S. W., 952.[583.]Beaty v. Kurtz, 27 U. S., 566; 7 L. Ed., 521.[584.]Heiss v. Murphy, 40 Wis., 276; Fadness v. Braunburg, 73 Wis., 257; 41 N. W., 84.[585.]Coe v. Washington, 149 Mass., 543; 21 N. E., 966.[586.]Clark v. Brown, 108 S. W., 421, Tex.[587.]Parker v. Quinn, 23 Utah, 332; 64 Pac., 961.[588.]All Saints v. Brookline, 59 N. E., 1003, Mass.[589.]Green v. Outagamie, 76 Wis., 587; 45 N. W., 536.[590.]Katzer v. City, 104 Wis., 16; 80 N. W., 41.[591.]St. Joseph Hospital v. Ashland, 96 Wis., 636; 72 N. W., 43.[592.]Ramsey v. Church, 45 Minn., 229; 47 N. W., 783.[593.]Gray v. Lafayette, 65 Wis., 567; 27 N. W., 311.[594.]Newport v. Masonic, 108 Ky., 333; 56 S. W., 405; 49 L. R. A., 252.[595.]Trustees v. City, 122 Wis., 452; 100 N. W., 837.[596.]Dahl v. Kimball, 6 Me., 171.[597.]Turner v. Inhabitants, 16 Mass., 208; Goodell Mfg. Co. v. Trask, 28 Mass., 514.[598.]Muzzy v. Wilkins, Smith, 1; Ebau v. Hendell, 5 Watts, 43; 30 Am. Dec., 291.[599.]Miller v. Board, 19 Ill. App., 48; Municipality of Ponce v. R. C. A. Ch., 28 Sup. Ct. R., 737; Reuben Quick-Bear v. Leupp, 28 Sup. Ct. Repr., 690; Dorner v. Dist., 118 N. W., 353.[600.]53 Cen. L. J., 224.[601.]Hewitt v. Woman's, 73 N. H., 556; 64 At., 190.[602.]Collins v. New York, 69 N. Y. Supp., 106.[603.]Louisville v. Hammock, 106 S. W., Ky., 219; 14 L. R. A., N. S., 784.[604.]Indianapolis v. Grant, 25 Ind., 518.[605.]Newport v. Masonic, 108 Ky., 333; 56 S. W., 405; 49 L. R. A., 252.[606.]McGee v. German, 13 N. J. Eq., 77.[607.]Miller v. Lerch, Wall. Jr., Pa., 210.[608.]St. Mary's Industrial School for Boys v. Brown, 45 Md., 310.[609.]White v. Price, 108 N. Y., 661; 15 N. E., 427.[610.]Sec. 5, Ky. Constitution; Contra: N. H. Constitution, art. 6.[611.]Donahue v. Richards, 38 Me., 376; State v. Baily, 157 Ind., 324; 61 N. E., 730; 54 Cen. L. J., 142.[612.]St. Patrick's v. Rochester, 34 How. Pr., 227.[613.]People v. Board, 13 Barb., N. Y., 400.[614.]Synod v. State, 2 S. Dak., 366; 50 N. W., 632; 14 L. R. A., 418.[615.]State v. Hallock, 16 Nev., 373; Dorner v. School Dist., 118 N. W., Wis., 353 (Nov. 27, 1908).[616.]Jenkins v. Andover, 103 Mass., 94.[617.]Millard v. Board, 121 Ill., 297; 10 N. E., 669; Dorner v. School Dist., 118 N. W., Wis., 353.[618.]Church v. Bullock, 100 S. W., Tex., 1025; Donahue v. Richards, 38 Me., 379; 56 C. L. J., 81.[619.]State v. Board, 76 Wis., 177; 44 N. W., 967; 7 L. R. A., 330; 53 Am. R., 282; 14 L. R. A., 419; Dorner v. School Dist., 118 N. W., Wis., 353 (Nov. 27, 1908).[620.]Billard v. Board, 69 Kan., 53; 76 Pac., 422; 66 L. R. A., 166.[621.]Stevenson v. Hanyon, 7 Pa. Co. Ct., 585; State v. Board, 76 Wis., 177; 44 N. W., 967; 7 L. R. A., 330; State v. Scheve, 65 Neb., 853; 91 N. W., 846; 59 L. R. A., 927.[622.]Dorner v. School District, 118 N. W., Wis., 353 (Nov. 27, 1908); County v. Industrial School, 125 Ill., 540; 18 N. E., 183; 1 L. R. A., 437; 8 Am. St. Rep., 386; O'Connor v. Hendrick, 184 N. Y., 421; 77 N. E., 612.[623.]Board v. Minor, 23 Ohio, 250; Campanas v. Calderhead, 17 Mont., 548; 44 Pac., 83; 36 L. R. A., 277.[624.]Spiller v. Woburn, 12 Allen, Mass., 127.[625.]School Commissioners v. State Board, 26 Md., 505.[626.]Donahue v. Richards, 38 Me., 379; 56 Cen. L. J., 81.[627.]Scofield v. State, 27 Conn., 499.[628.]School v. Arnold, 21 Wis., 657.[629.]Sherman v. Charleston, 8 Cushing, Mass., 160; State v. Board, 116 N. W., 232; 67 Cen. L. J., 241.[630.]Guernsey v. Pitkin, 32 Vt., 224.[631.]Wood v. Morrow, 35 Wis., 59.[632.]Anderson v. State, 3 Head, Tenn., 455.[633.]Lander v. Seaver, 32 Vt., 114.[634.]Stevens v. Fassett, 27 Me., 266.[635.]Draper v. Cambridge, 20 Ind., 268.[636.]Lane v. Baker, 12 Ohio St., 237; State v. City, 19 Ohio, 178; Van Camp v. Board, 9 Ohio St., 406.[637.]Ex parte Plessy, 45 La. Ann., 80; 11 So., 948; 16 Sup. Ct. R., 1138; 163 U. S., 537; 41 L. Ed., 256; 18 L. R. A., 639.[638.]State v. School Directors, 10 Ohio St., 448.[639.]Jackson v. Hampden, 16 Me., 184.[640.]Markwell v. Pereles, 95 Wis., 406 and 424; 69 N. W., 798 and 984.[641.]Perry v. State, 113 Ga., 936; 39 S. E., 315.[642.]Aycock v. Harrington, 84 Miss., 204; 36 So., 245; 65 L. R. A., 689.[643.]Wright v. Bennett, 7 Ill., 587.[644.]Graham v. Bennett, 2 Cal., 503.[645.]State v. Harris, 63 N. C., 1.[646.]Rex. v. Canon, 7 Car. and P., 438.[647.]Rex. v. Griffen, 6 Cox. C. C., 402.[648.]F. v. F., 1 Ch. (1902), 688.[649.]In re Jacques, 82 N. Y. Sup., 986.[650.]In re Marshall, 33 N. Y. S., 104.[651.]Kennedy v. Borah, 226 Ill., 243; 80 N. E., 767.[652.]Prieto v. Alphonso, 52 La. Ann., 631; 27 So., 153.[653.]Clarkson v. Hatton, 143 Mo., 47; 44 S. W., 761; 65 Am. St. R., 635; Matter of Johnson, 98 Cal., 531; 33 Pac., 260; 21 L. R. A., 380; Schlitz v. Roenitz, 86 Wis., 31; 56 N. W., 194; 39 Am. St. R., 873; 21 L. R. A., 482; Markwell v. Pereles, 95 Wis., 406; 69 N. W., 798; 67 Cen. L. J., 197.[654.]Elliott v. Elliott, 77 Wis., 634; 46 N. W., 806; 57 L. R. A., 155; 10 L. R. A., 568.[655.]Cole v. State, 75 S. W., 527; 45 Tex.; Cr. App., 225; 57 Cen. L. J., 341.[656.]Mutter v. Senibbs, 79 N. E., 762, Mass.[657.]Commonwealth v. McAfee, 108 Mass., 458.[658.]Tuttle v. Sutts, 96 Pac., 260.[659.]Gleason v. Gleason, 4 Wis., 64; 14 Cyc, 846.[660.]32 St. At. L., 636 and 645.[661.]Chap. 1402, U. S. Laws of 1904.[662.]Quick-Bear v. Leupp, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep., 690 (1908).[663.]Sec. 2045, U. S. Statutes.[664.]Secs. 2071 and 2072, U. S. Statutes, and Chap. 188, Laws of 1895.[665.]26 St. At. L., 1014.[666.]Quick-Bear v. Leupp, 28 Sup. Ct. Repr., 690; 27 St. L., 628 and 635.[667.]In re Lehah-puc-ka-chee, 98 Fed., 429.[668.]Chap. 503, Laws of 1888.[669.]Chap. 3, Laws of 1897.[670.]61 Cen. L. J., 101, 289; 62 Cen. L. J., 215, 219.[671.]McCann v. County, 6 Mont., 297.[672.]Hubbard v. Railway, 104 Wis., 160; 80 N. W., 454.[673.]Hochheimer on Custody of Infants, sec. 54; People v. Turner, 55 Ill., 280; People v. Park, 41 N. Y., 21, 33.[674.]Kleizer v. Symes, 40 Ind., 562; Etchison v, Pergeson, 88 Ga., 620; 15 S. E., 680; Lucas v. Case, 72 (9 Bush) Ky., 297; York v. Pease, 68 Mass., 288; Piper v. Woolman, 43 Neb., 280; 61 N. W., 588; O'Donahue v. McGovern, 23 Wendell, N. Y., 26; Servatius v. Pichel, 34 Wis., 292.[675.]Combes v. Rose, 8 Blackf., 155; Servatius v. Pichel, 34 Wis., 292; Etchison v. Pergeson, 88 Ga., 620; 15 S. E., 680.[676.]Gardener v. Anderson, Fed. Case, 5220; Rector v. Smith, 11 Ia., 302.[677.]See “Excommunication,” ante. Servatius v. Pichel, 34 Wis., 292; 11 L. R. A., 592.[678.]Shelton v. Nause, 46 Ky., 128.[679.]Fawcett v. Charles, 13 Wendell, 473.[680.]54 Cen. L. J., 313.[681.]Hellstern v. Katzer, 103 Wis., 391; 79 N. W., 429.[682.]Hills v. State, 61 Neb., 589; 85 N. W., 836.[683.]Konkle v. Haven, 140 Mich., 472; 103 N. W., 850.[684.]Klos v. Zahorik, 113 Ia., 161; 84 N. W., 1046.[685.]Libel and Slander, Townsend, secs. 233, 234; 25 Cyc, 390, 398, 411.[686.]Grace v. Dempsey, 75 Wis., 313; 43 N. W., 1127; Grace v. McArthur, 76 Wis., 641; 45 N. W., 518.[687.]25 Cyc, 390, 398.[688.]62 Cen. L. J., 180.[689.]Libel and Slander, Townsend, p. 182 (notes).[690.]Libel and Slander, Townsend, sec. 177; 25 Cyc, 398; Edwards v. Bell, 8 Moore, 467.[691.]Remington v. Congdon, 2 Pickering, 315; Bradley v. Heath, 12 Pickering, 163.[692.]McConckle v. Binns, 5 Binns, Pa., 340.[693.]MacBride v. Allis, 9 Rich., S. C., 313.[694.]State v. Riggs, 22 Vt., 322.[695.]Commonwealth v. Batchelder, Thach., Mass., Cr. Cas., 191.[696.]Shoe & L. v. Thompson, 18 Abbot's Pr., N. Y., 413.[697.]Sans v. Joerris, 14 Wis., 663.[698.]5 Cyc, 715; “Disorderly Conduct,” 14 Cyc, 467.[699.]14 Cyc, 540.[700.]Williams v. State, 83 Ala., 78; 3 So., 616.[701.]Hull v. State, 120 Ind., 153; 22 N. E., 117.[702.]Hunt v. State, 3 Tex., 116.[703.]State v. Kirby, 108 N. C., 772; 12 S. E., 1045.[704.]Commonwealth v. Sigman, 2 Clark, Pa., 36.[705.]State v. Wright, 41 Ark., 410; Tanner v. State, 126 Ga., 77; 54 S. E., 914.[706.]State v. Shepherd, 54 S. C., 178; 32 S. E., 146; 14 Cyc, 467, 540.[707.]Martin v. State, 65 Tenn., 234.[708.]State v. Leighton, 35 Me., 195.[709.]Marvin v. State, 19 Ind., 181.[710.]Brown v. State, 46 Ala., 175.[711.]State v. Turkhaw, 69 N. C., 215.[712.]Richardson v. State, 5 Tex. App., 470.[713.]U. S. v. Brooks, 4 Cranch, C. C., 427.[714.]People v. Crowley, 23 Hun., 412; McLane v. Mallock, 7 Ind., 525.[715.]Kinney v. State, 38 Ala., 224; State v. Lusk, 68 Ind., 264; State v. Edwards, 32 Mo., 548; Tanner v. State, 126 Ga., 77; 54 S. E., 914.[716.]MacLean v. Mallock, 7 Ind., 525.[717.]Wall v. Lee, 34 N. Y., 141.[718.]Meyer v. Baker, 120 Ill., 567; 12 N. E., 79; Commonwealth v. Bearse, 132 Mass., 542; 42 Am. R., 450; West v. State, 28 Tenn., 66; Cramer v. Marks, 64 Pa. St., 151.[719.]5 Cyc, 713; Commonwealth v. Linn, 158 Pa., 22; 27 At., 843; 22 L. R. A., 353.[720.]Gaines v. State, 75 Tenn., 410; Holcombe v. Cornish, 8 Conn., 375; Bodenheimer v. State, 60 Ark., 10; 28 S. W., 507.[721.]State v. Chandler, 2 Har., Del., 553.[722.]Commonwealth v. Kneeland, 37 Mass. (20 Pick), 206.[723.]People v. Ruggles, 8 Johnson, 225.[724.]State v. Chandler, 2 Harr., Del., 553.[725.]State v. Pepper, 68 N. C., 259.[726.]Odell v. Garnett, 4 Blackf., Ind., 549.[727.]People v. Porter, 2 Park, N. Y. Cr., 14.[728.]State v. Chandler, 2 Harr., Del., 553; Commonwealth v. Kneeland, Thach., Mass. Cr. Cas., 346.[729.]Miller v. State, 76 Ind., 310.[730.]Petty v. State, 58 Ark., 1; 22 S. W., 654.[731.]Splane v. Commonwealth, 12 At., Pa., 431.[732.]Commonwealth v. Keiten, 1 Monag., 368.[733.]Cain v. Daly, 74 S. C, 480; 55 S. E., 110.[734.]Ex parte Jentisch, 112 Cal., 468; 44 Pac., 803.[735.]State v. Lorey, 66 Tenn., 95.[736.]State v. Krech, 10 Wash., 166; 38 Pac., 1001.[737.]People v. Havenor, 149 N. Y., 195; 43 N. E., 541; 3 L. R. A., 689; State v. Dolan, 13 Idaho, 693; 92 Pac., 995; 14 L. R. A., N. S., 1259.[738.]Flag v. Inhabitants, 58 Mass., 243; Doyle v. Lynn, 118 Mass., 195.[739.]Hayden v. Mitchell, 103 Ga., 431; 30 S. E., 287.[740.]Roth v. Hacks, 68 Mo. App., 283.[741.]Hofer v. Cowan, 55 Cen. L. J., 290.[742.]Byrant v. Watson, 127 Ind., 42; 26 N. E., 687; Allen v. Duffy, 43 Mich., 1; 4 N. W., 427; 11 L. R. A., 63; Dale v. Knapp, 98 Pa., 389.[743.]Society v. Commonwealth, 52 Pa., 125; Parker v. State, 84 Tenn., 476.[744.]McCabe v. Father Matthews, 24 Hun., 149; People v. Young, 67 Barb., 357.[745.]Philadelphia v. Lehman, 56 Md., 209; Kroer v. People, 78 Ill., 294.[746.]Fox v. Abel, 2 Conn., 541.[747.]Bryant v. Inhabitants, 30 Me., 193; Tracy v. Jenks, 32 Mass., 465.[748.]Carpenter v. Crane, 1 Root, Conn., 98.[749.]Judefinde v. State, 78 Md., 510; 28 At., 405; 22 L. R. A., 721, note.[750.]55 Cen. L. J., 44; 56 Cen. L. J., 261; State v. Cheneworth, 163 Ind., 94; 71 N. E., 197; 59 Cen. L. J., 202.[751.]Speed v. Tomlinson, 73 N. H., 46; 59 At., 376; 68 L. R. A., 432.[752.]State v. Rodgers, 128 N. C., 576; 38 S. E., 34.[753.]U. S. v. Moore, 104 Fed., 78.[754.]Constant v. Rector, 4 Daly, 1.[755.]Frederickson v. W. R. Cem. Ass., 133 Wis., 502; 113 N. W., 1023.[756.]14 Op. Atty-Gen., 27; secs. 4780-4782, U. S. Statutes; 16 Op. Atty-Gen., 13.[757.]20 St. at L., 281.[758.]Sohier v. Trinity Ch., 109 Mass., 1; City v. Town, 82 Wis., 374; 52 N. W., 425.[759.]Trustees v. Manning, 72 Md., 116; 19 At., 599.[760.]Porch v. St. Bridget's, 81 Wis., 599; 51 N. W., 1007.[761.]In re Highland, 4 Pa. Dist. Rep., 653.[762.]Commonwealth v. Fisher, 7 Phil., 264; Bourland v. Springdale, 158 Ill., 458; 42 N. E., 86.[763.]City v. Watson, 56 N. J. L., 667; 24 L. R. A., 843; 49 Cen. L. J., 307.[764.]Coates v. City, 7 Cowan, N. Y., 585; Humphrey v. Frost, 109 N. C., 132; 13 S. E., 793; City v. Austin, 87 Tex., 330; 28 S. W., 528; 47 Am. St. R., 114.[765.]Stockton v. City, 42 N. J. Eq., 531; 9 At., 203; First v. Meyers, 5 Okla., 819; 50 Pac., 70; 38 L. R. A., 329.[766.]Steams v. Manchester, 63 N. H., 390; Henry v. Trustees, 48 Ohio, 671; 30 N. E., 1122.[767.]Upjohn v. Board, 46 Mich., 542; 9 N. W., 845.[768.]Edwards v. Stonington, 20 Conn., 466.[769.]Oakland v. People, 93 Tex., 569; 57 S. W., 27; 55 L. R. A., 503.[770.]Louisville v. Nevin, 73 Ky., 549; First v. Hazel, 63 Neb., 844; 89 N. W., 378.[771.]Page v. Simons, 63 N. H., 17.[772.]Wygant v. McLaughlin, 39 Or., 429; 64 Pac., 867; 54 L. R. A., 636; 53 Cen. L. J., 48.[773.]Trustees v. Manning, 72 Md., 116; 19 At., 599; Close v. Glenwood, 107 U. S., 466; 2 Sup. Ct. R., 267; 27 L. Ed., 408; Matter of Bd. of Street Opening, 133 N. Y., 329; 31 N. E., 102; 28 Am. St. R., 640; 16 L. R. A., 180.[774.]In re Waldron, 26 R. I., 84; 58 At., 453; 67 L. R. A., 118; Wright v. Hollywood, 112 Ga., 884; 38 S. E., 94; 52 L. R. A., 621.[775.]Perkins v. Mass., 138 Mass., 361.[776.]Wright v. Hollywood, 112 Ga., 884; 38 S. E., 94.[777.]People v. Trustees, 21 Hun., 184; McGuire v. St. Pat. C. C., 3 N. Y. Sup., 781; Baltimore v. Manning, 72 Md., 116; 19 At., 599.[778.]Palmer v. Cypress, 122 N. Y., 429; 25 N. E., 983.[779.]Conger v. Weyant, 55 Hun., 605.[780.]Baltimore v. Manning, 72 Md., 116; 19 At., 599.[781.]Went v. Methodist, 80 Hun., 266; Adams v. First, 148 Mich., 140; 111 N. W., 757; 11 L. R. A., N. S., 509.[782.]Lakin v. Ames, 64 Mass., 198.[783.]Donnelly v. Boston, 146 Mass., 163; 15 N. E., 505.[784.]Rawson v. School, 89 Mass., 299.[785.]St. Johns v. Haans, 31 Pa. St., 9.[786.]Dangerfield v. Williams, 26 App., S. C., 508.[787.]Silverwood v. Latrobe, 68 Md., 620; 13 At., 161.[788.]Bessimer v. Jenkins, 111 Ala., 135; 18 So., 565; 66 Am. St. R., 26.[789.]Davidson v. Reed, 111 Ill., 167; 53 Am. R., 613; Boyce v. Kalbough, 47 Md., 334.[790.]Burke v. Wall, 29 La. Ann., 38; Seymour v. Page, 33 Conn., 61; Perkins v. Mass., 138 Mass., 361.[791.]Hyde Park v. Oakwoods, 119 Ill., 141; 7 N. E., 627; Matter of Bd. of Street Opening, 133 N.Y., 329; 31 N. E., 102; 28 Am. St. E., 640 L. R. A., 180.[792.]Eastern v. City of Louisville, 13 Ky. L. Rep., 279; 15 S. W., 1117.[793.]Burke v. Wall, 29 La. Ann., 38; Appeal of Gumbert, 110 Pa. St., 496; 1 At, 437.[794.]In re Reformed, 7 Howard's Pr., 476; Scoville v. MacMahon, 62 Conn., 378; 26 At., 479.[795.]Antrim v. Malsbury, 43 N.J. Eq., 288; 13 At., 180.[796.]Hertle v. Riddell, Ky., 106 S. W., 282; 15 L. R. A., N. S., 796.[797.]Lewis v. Walker, 165 Pa. St., 30; 30 At., 500.[798.]State v. Wilson, 94 N. C., 1015.[799.]Farelly v. Metairie, 42 La. Ann., 28; 10 So., 386; Commonwealth v. Maria, 2 Weekly Notes Cases, 244.[800.]Hullman v. Honcomp, 5 Ohio St., 237.[801.]MacGuire v. St. Patrick's, 54 Hun., 207.[802.]Dwenger v. Geary, 113 Ind., 106; 14 N. E., 903; Nance v. Busby, 91 Tenn., 303; 15 L. R. A., 801.[803.]Mt. Maria v. Commonwealth, 81 Pa. St., 235; 22 Am. Rep., 743; Cemetery Co. v. Walker, 29 Ky. L. R., 1252; 97 S. W., 34; 7 L. R. A., N. S., 155.[804.]Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn., 307; 50 N. W., 238; 14 L. R. A., 85; 28 Am. St. R., 370; Pettigrew v. P., 207 Pa., 313; 56 At., 878; 64 L. R. A., 179.[805.]McEntee v. Bonacum, 66 Neb., 651; 92 N. W., 633; 66 L. R. A., 440.[806.]Hook v. Joyce, 94 Ky., 450; 22 S. W., 651; 21 L. R. A., 96.[807.]Columbus v. C., 82 Wis., 334; 52 N. W., 425; 16 L. R. A., 695; Mt. Hope v. Boston, 158 Mass., 509; 33 N. E., 695; 35 Am. St. R., 515; Kincaid's Appeal, 66 Pa. St., 411; 5 Am. R., 377; Bessimer v. Jenkins, 111 Ala., 135; 56 Am. St. R., 26; 18 So., 565.[808.]Wilson v. Reed, 68 At., 37, N. H.; Wormley v. Wormley, 207 Ill., 411; 60 N. E., 865; 3 L. R. A., N. S., 481.[809.]Thirkfield v. Mountain, 12 Utah, 76; 41 Pac., 564; Wright v. Hollywood, 112 Ga., 884; 38 S. E., 94; 52 L. R. A., 621.[810.]Toppin v. Moriarty, 59 N. J. Eq., 115; 44 At., 469; 50 Cen. L. J., 21.[811.]Cohen v. Cong., 99 N. Y. S., 732.[812.]Feeley v. Andrews, 191 Mass., 313; 77 N. E., 766; State v. McLean, 121 N. C., 589; 28 S. E., 140; 42 L. R. A., 721.[813.]McEntee v. Bonacum, 66 Neb., 651; 92 N. W., 633; 66 L. R. A., 440.[814.]Mutual, etc., v. Griesa, 156 F., 398.[815.]Hayes v. State, 112 Wis., 304; 87 N. W., 1076.[816.]14 L. R. A., 85; Young v. College of Physicians, 81 Md., 358; 32 At., 177; 31 L. R. A., 540; Meyers v. Clarke, 28 Ky. L., 1000; 90 S. W., 1049; 5 L. R. A., N. S., 727.[817.]Lindh v. Ry., 99 Minn., 408; 109 N. W., 823; 7 L. R. A., N. S., 1018.[818.]Long v. Ry., 15 Oklahoma, 512; 86 Pac., 289; 6 L. R. A., N. S., 883; Griffith v. Charlotte, 23 S. C., 25; 55 Am. Rep., 1.[819.]Koerber v. Patek, 123 Wis., 453; 102 N. W., 40; Thompson v. State, 105 Tenn., 177; 58 S. W., 213; 80 Am. St. R., 875; 51 L. R. A., 883.[820.]Williams v. Williams, 20 Ch. Div., 659.[821.]Reg. v. Fox, 2 Q. B., 246.[822.]52 Cen. L. J., 141.[823.]O'Donnell v. Slack, 123 Cal., 285; 55 Pacific, 906; 43 L. R. A., 388; Neighbors v. Neighbors, 23 Ky. L., 1433; 65 S. W., 607; Larson v. Chase, 47 Minn., 307; 50 N. W., 238; 14 L. R. A., 85.[824.]Enos v. Snyder, 131 Cal., 68; 63 Pac., 170; 82 Am. St. R., 330; 53 L. R. A., 21.[825.]Thompson v. Deeds, 93 Ia., 228; 61 N. W., 842.[826.]Durrell v. Haywood, 75 Mass., 248.[827.]Boham v. Loeb, 107 Ala., 604; 18 So., 300; Hamilton v. State, 30 Ind., 482; Partridge v. First, 39 Md., 631; Fletcher v. Evans, 140 Mass., 24; 2 N. E., 837.[828.]Commonwealth v. Viall, 84 Mass., 512.[829.]Donnelly v. Boston, 146 Mass., 163; 15 N. E., 505.[830.]Houston v. Drew, 13 Tex. Cir. App., 536; 36 S. W., 802.[831.]Robertson v. Bullions, 11 N. Y., 243.[832.]Canadian v. Palmenter, 180 Mass., 415; 62 N. E., 740.[833.]Barabasz v. Kabat, 86 Md., 23; 37 At., 720.[834.]In re Hawkins, 165 N. Y., 188; 58 N. E., 884.[835.]Chapin v. Holyoke, 165 Mass., 280; 42 N. E., 1130; Am. & Eng. Cyc. of L., “Taxation.”[836.]In re Barry, 164 N. Y., 18; 58 N. E., 12.[837.]American Law of Electors, McCrary, sec. 41.[838.]Lansing v. Haynes, 95 Mich., 16; 54 N. W., 699; Baacke v. Baacke, 50 Neb., 18; 69 N., 303; Jones, Jr., estate, 211 Pa., 364; 60 At., 915; 69 L. R. A., 940; White v. B. of A. Y., 124 Ia., 293; 99 N. W., 1071; 66 L. R. A., 164.[839.]Rogers v. Elliott, 146 Mass., 349; 15 N. E., 768; Davis v. Sawyer, 133 Mass., 289; 43 Am. R., 519; Harrison v. St. Mark's, 12 Phil., 259; Soltau v. DeHeld, 9 Eng. L. & E., 104; Leete v. Pilgrim Cong. Ch., 14 Mo. App., 590.[840.]Osborne v. Osborne, New York, Sept. 12, 1908; Landry v. Bellanger, 45 So., 956; 15 L. R. A., N. S., 463; Lawson v. Lawson, 30 Tex. Civ. App., 43; 69 S. W., 246; Schmitt v. Schneider, 109 Ga., 628; 35 S. E., 145.[841.]14 Cyc, 466.[842.]Minagham v. State, 77 Wis., 643; 46 N. W., 894; Gilmore v. Fuller, 198 Ill., 130; 65 N. E., 84.[843.]Am. & Eng. Ency. of L., “Stara decisis,” “Res judicata”; 67 Central L. Journal, 255; Pautz v. Plankinton, 126 Wis., 37; 105 N. W., 482; Whittaker v. Mich. M. L. Ins. Co., 83 N. E., 899.[844.]Bonacum v. Murphy, 71 Neb., 463; 104 N. W., 180.[845.]U. S. Bankruptcy Act, sec. 1, sub-sec. 25.[846.]20 Cyc, 457.[847.]20 Cyc, 1243; Insolvent Corporations, Wait, sec. 637.[848.]20 Cyc, 469.