[207] Ecgberht … and his Coins, Numismatic Chronicle, 3rd Series, xx. 66-87. For a copy of this (too) ingenious essay I am indebted to the kindness of Sir Henry himself. His unfavourable view of the Saxon Chronicle is strongly expressed here and elsewhere.
[208] Foundations of England, i. 257.
[209] See Chron. sub anno, and notes.
[210] ‘Aut cum Paganis sub captiuitate erant,’ 489 C [52].
[211] 469 C [5].
[212] 469 B, C [5] (four times).
[213] 487 C [47]; probably in 473 A [14] Suth-Seaxum should be read for-am.
[214] 484 A [38]. These forms are very common in Ethelwerd, whose work is also based mainly on the Chronicle: ‘quod Huiccum nuncupatur,’ 509 f.; Dorsetum Dux, 511 B; Defenum Dux, 511 C.
[215] 489 B [51], 490 C [54]; in the latter passage he has also Sigona, which is a sort of compromise.
[216] 469 B [219].