[132] This is the only passage of Hegetor’s writing that has survived. It has been preserved in the work of Apollonius of Citium.
[133] Leyden Voss 4ᵒ 9* of the sixth century is a fragment of this work.
[134] V. Rose, Sorani Ephesii vetus translatio Latina cum additis Graeci textus reliquiis, Leipzig, 1882; F. Weindler, Geschichte der gynäkologisch-anatomischen Abbildung, Dresden, 1908.
[135] The discovery and attribution of these figures is the work of K. Sudhoff. A bibliography of his writings on the subject will be found in a ‘Study in Early Renaissance Anatomy’ in C. Singer’s Studies in the History and Method of Science, vol. i, Oxford, 1917.
[136] First Latin edition Venice, 1552; first Greek edition Paris, 1554.
[137] e. g. περὶ κράσεως καὶ δυνάμεως τῶν ἁπάντων φαρμάκων and the φάρμακα.
[138] e. g. De dynamidiis Galeni, Secreta Hippocratis and many astrological tracts.
[139] Dissection of animals was practised at Salerno as early as the eleventh century.
[140] The sources of the anatomical knowledge of the Middle Ages are discussed in detail in the following works: R. R. von Töply, Studien zur Geschichte der Anatomie im Mittelalter, Vienna, 1898; K. Sudhoff, Tradition und Naturbeobachtung, Leipzig, 1907; and also numerous articles in the Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und Naturwissenschaften; Charles Singer, ‘A Study in Early Renaissance Anatomy’, in Studies in the History and Method of Science, vol. i, Oxford, 1917.
[141] Benivieni’s notes were published posthumously. Some of the spurious Greek works of the Hippocratic collection have also case notes.