What does he conclude?
“I am fully persuaded that nothing short of national legislation, and national authority for its enforcement, will be found sufficient for the maintenance of our God-given rights as men and women, citizens of this great and free country.”
Mr. Morrill. As my honorable friend emphasizes that particular point, will he be kind enough to say whether he reads that letter as an authority showing that Congress has the power to do what he asks, or whether it is simply an individual opinion that some such legislation is necessary?
Mr. Sumner. I think my friend must know that I do not read the letter as an authority, according to his use of the term. By-and-by I shall come to the authority. I read it as the opinion of a colored citizen—
Mr. Morrill. As to the necessity of legislation?
Mr. Sumner. Who has felt the grievance, and testifies that the remedy can only be through the Nation. There is where he differs from my friend.
Mr. Morrill. It is not necessary to read evidence to me that the colored people think there ought to be legislation by Congress. The question between the Senator and myself is precisely this: What is your authority?
Mr. Sumner. I am coming to that. This is only the beginning.
Mr. Morrill. When you come to that, and make an issue with me, I shall be ready to answer.