DESCRIPTION. Owner. Whence obtained. Cost. Estimated
Value.
27. Tazza Le Duc d’Uzes £500
28. Cover of cup Le Duc d’Uzes 150
29. Pilgrim’s bottle Le Duc d’Uzes 800
30. Tazza and cover M. Hutteau d’Origny 500
31. Tazza and cover Musée de Cluny Bought by M. Thoré in 1798 £20 500
32. Salt-cellar Baron A. de Rothschild 300
33. Jug or canette Baron A. de Rothschild Bought by Strauss, £600 800 1,000
34. Small ewer Baron A. de Rothschild Préaux sale, 1850 44 500
35. Candlestick Baron G. de Rothschild £1,000
36 Hanap Baron G. de Rothschild 500
37. Tazza Baron James de Rothschild South of France, 1860 £480 500
38. Biberon Museum of the Louvre Sauvageot, from Tours 800
39. Salt-cellar Museum of the Louvre Sauvageot, from Lehrié, 1824 5 300
40. Salt-cellar Museum of the Louvre Sauvageot, from Troyes 300
41. Salt-cellar Museum of the Louvre Sauvageot, from Troyes 300
42. Tazza Museum of the Louvre Sauvageot, bo’t as Palissy 8 500
43. Salt-cellar Museum of the Louvre Revoil collection, 1828 300
44. Tazza Museum of the Louvre Revoil collection, 1828 500
45. Tazza Sèvres Museum 500
46. Cover of cup Sèvres Museum 150
47. Salt-cellar Madame d’Yvon 300
48. Salt-cellar Comte de Tussau 300
49. Salt-cellar Comte de Tussau 300
50. Salt-cellar Comte de Tussau 300
51. Cover of tazza. M. B. Delessert South of France, by Rutter. 4 150
52. Biberon

In Russia, one piece:

DESCRIPTION. Owner. Whence obtained. Cost. Estimated
Value.
53. Biberon. Prince Galitzin Préaux sale, 1850 £100 £800

CHAPTER VIII.
FRENCH FAIENCE.—NEVERS, ROUEN, BEAUVAIS, ETC.

Number of Manufactories.—Their Rise and Decline.—Nevers.—Prices.—Beauvais.—Rouen.—Moustiers.—Strasbourg, or Haguenau.—Marseilles.—Sarreguemines.—Sinceny, Nancy, Creil, Montpellier.—Paris.—Paris to-day.—Limoges.—Deck.

OF French faiences, the Palissy ware and the Henri-Deux have been already treated.

I now propose to give some account of the most prominent among the very large number of potteries which, in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, sprang up in various parts of France. Mr. Chaffers, in his work upon “Pottery,” etc., enumerates one hundred and sixty-five factories which in 1790 petitioned the National Assembly that they might not be ruined by the floods of cheap pottery then being sent in from England; and this was not the whole number in France.

Great skill and much good taste have been expended upon the faiences of France, and some of the work rises into the region of art. Much of that found in collections and museums is of this kind. But it should not be forgotten that the great purpose and business of those manufactories was the production of dishes, plates, and services, for the table—for the uses of life. And in this direction the production in France was very large and profitable, until the time when, as said above, the introduction of cheap wares from England ruined the makers. These disastrous changes and whimseys of trade, disagreeable as they may be to the masters and the workmen who are ruined, do give a certain zest and variety to human history; they relieve life from the monotony and dullness which usually attends upon unbroken prosperity. As some of the doctrinaires tell us, they are really blessings—often very much in disguise; at least, they seem so to those who are the immediate sufferers.