“Item—the Sessions, Actings, and Canons of the 2 Genˡˡ Assemblies holden att Glasgow & Edinburgh, the one in 1638, yᵉ oyʳ in 1639, containing att great length everie thinge that past, ather spoken or done yʳ in: This takes up till folio 312.”
It is from the record thus described that the following report is extracted.
Before the MS. which we have adopted had come into our hands, Mr David Laing, librarian of the Writers to the Signet, had kindly communicated another and similar report, but wanting several leaves both at the beginning and end; and we were in hopes ere now to have had also in our possession a third MS. belonging to Mr Simpson, schoolmaster of Corstorphine, from which Dr Aiton states he took his account of the Assembly 1638, that is given in his Life of Henderson. Circumstances, however, have occurred to prevent this; but we are enabled, on the authority of Professor Fleming, of Glasgow College, who has collated these MS.S., to say that it coincides entirely with the Stirling’s Library Copy. Mr Laing’s copy seems to have at one time belonged to Dr Boog of Paisley: Mr Simpson’s was found in the repositories of a deceased brother, who was a preacher of the Secession communion; but we have not been able to learn any further particulars than those now mentioned, with respect to the several MS.S. referred to. The one which we subjoin, however, and the other documents that we have collected, will, we trust, render the present, on the whole, the most complete account of the Glasgow Assembly which has ever yet been published.
In addition to the documents contained in the “Large Declaration,” “Burnet’s Memoires of the House of Hamilton,” and “Balfour’s Annales,” we have to acknowledge the accession which we have obtained of some of the earlier edicts of Charles I. and the Scotch Privy Council, derived from the original record—an obligation which we owe to Mr A. M‘Donald of the Register House, and which we prize the more, because these documents have been suppressed in the various works to which we refer. To the Rev. Mr M‘Crie, too, we are indebted for the use of a Collection of Documents which belonged to his distinguished father, from whence we have gleaned several important writs, the authenticity of which is established by the duplicates attested under the hand of Archibald Johnston, the Clerk of the Assembly 1638, still in the repositories of the Church.
[November 21, 1638.]
The first day, the Commissioners from the King and Kirke being conveined, after prayer be Mr John Bell, Moderatour, agried upon till a moderatour was chosen, The King’s Commission to the Marqueis was [read], next the Commissions from 66 severall presbitries wer given into the Clerkes sone of the former Assembly, together with the Commissions from townes and colledges, and the names of the Commissioners red.
Sess. 1.[136]
After in calling vpon the name of God, The Kings Commissioner requyred that the Commissions might be examined before a Moderatour should be chosen, least some men should voit in chooseing a Moderatour, who wer not instructed with a sufficient Commission.
It was answered be the Earle of Rothes, Lord Loudoun, Mr Alexʳ Henrysone, Mr David Dick, and Mr Wᵐ Livingstoun, that a Moderatour behoved first to be chosen, before the Commissions could be examined, for thir reasons:—A Ecclesiasticall Moderatour should be chosen by the suffrage of such as have given in their Commissions for the Kirke and Burghes before particulars can be tryed—first, becaus this is the order and practise of the Kirke of Scotland. 2 reason, It is agrieable to reason, that the Assembly should descend by degries to the constitution from a promiscuous convention, to a number instructed with commissions from the severall Kirkes of the kingdome, vnto whose commission that much respect is due, that they may be presumed to be, for the most pairt, valide and worthie, at the least [to] have a voice in choyseing of a Moderator to themselves, by whose meanes everie commission may be more exactlie tryed. 3 reason, It is one of the poynts of the freedome of the Assembly, that the Commissioners from the Kirkes and burghes choyse their owne Moderatour, incontinent after the exhibition of the Commission, least any thing which concernes them be done inordourly or without the consent in the meeting where they are present. 4 reason, The Tryell of the Commissions is one of the worthiest matters of the Assembly, and never were there any discussion of the validitie of them before a Moderatour was chosen, and the judicatorie brought to a frame, so farre as the whole might judge of everie pairt; nor can they be discussed till the propper judicatorie be ance sett in a tollerable maner, which be the lawes hes authoritie to judge thereof. 5 reason, It was required in all the supplications for a free Assembly, that the questions belonging the maner and matter of Assemblies, should be referred to the Assembly it selfe; and, now a free Assembly is granted and indicted, therefore a formall Assembly must ance be made before any ecclesiastick question belonging to the Assembly can be rightlie discussed, which cannot be done till a Moderatour be chosen by common consent of the Kirke conveened. 6 reason, Seeing it is certaine, that these who are come doe represent the Kirkes from which they are come, and are instructed so well as they could be their knowledge, it were wrong done to the Kirkes conveened, not to suffer them to begin their owne incorporation, and to draw their oune Members to some ordourlie frame that at the first entrie they may proceed ordourlie. 7 Reason, Whatsomever reason can be alleadgit why the Commissions cannot be postponed to the chooseing of the Moderatour, will be more valide to prove that they cannot be discussed before the chooseing of a Moderatour. 8 Reason, Progressus erit in infinitum.