Then the Moderatour said—Let the Commissions which are in question be discussed, and begin at the Presbitrie of Peibles, given, October first, to Mr James Bennet, and Laird of Posso, subscryved be the Clerk.
The Commission was read, and a protestation against it, alleadging that that election was not free, for many reasons.
My Lord Traquair craved libertie to speake in defence of that Commission: and
The Moderatour required that he should speake of the Minister who gave in the protestation, with a respect due to a Minister of Jesus Christ, till he was declared infamous.
My Lord Traquair answered—That he had no purpose to reckon for the tyme, but would referre the challenge against him to the Presbitrie; only craved libertie to regrat that so unjustlie he was brought upon the stage, seeing he did attest all the witnesses that were present at the outgiving of that Commission, that he did carry himself humblie and modestlie, as became a good Christian, intending nothing but a free and peaceable election; and that he did not utter any crosse word, or a word smelling of passion or discontent; and he attested God that the matter was as he said. Then he declaired that there was a formall process [extract] of that election in the hands of the Clerk of the Presbitrie, which, being produced, would make it cleare how unjustlie he was accused; which process he promised to produce the next day.
The Moderatour answered—If the process come from ane honest hand, and be clearlie and formallie deduced, it shall have faith; and, if the pairtie protester against the Commission can prove the contrare be sufficient witnesse, he also must be heard.
Mr Lord Traquair answered—It is hard to heare witnesses agᵗ a eldar, and formal process given in by a famous Clerk in writt.
The Moderatour asked at Mr Robert Ellot, (who gave in the protestation,) what he could say? He answered, That it was a vyld imputation layd to his charge, that he should be ane vnjust accuser of such a nobleman; but, sayth he, if I have done no evil, why am I called a basse, ambitious, brybbish boddie, in the hearing of this reverend assembly? But I passe it, seeing my Lord was called a Carpenter, a wine bibber, and ane enemie to Cæsar, and that he had a divel; yet I have said nothing as a libeller against my Lord Traquair, for I was readie to spend my life in his service; and I judged that he should have lyked the better of me, that I should have protested against any thing which seemed to prejudge this Assembly.
The Moderatour asked if the protestation made against that election was made in a Clerks hearing before witnesses, and if it was written and marked?
Mr Robert Ellot answered—That he protested openlie, and desired to be so heard, but it was refused.