Mr David Dick said—Doctor Wᵐ Guild and I was auditors of ane who was a verie penitent man, for taking some money at their Assembly. He confessed he gat 40 punds; and we asked what he did with it? He answered—he bought ane silver satt fatt with it, and he said “there was no more to give me.”
Doctor Guild said—In trueth there was some money in dealling, but he came to the hinder end and when the purse was weill neare teemed.
Mr Joⁿ Ker said—I know a minister, Mr John Lawder, that came when the bag was almost teemed, and the Earle of Dumbar, who was his patron, said—“Well, Mr John, yow are too lang a-coming, for I have no more left but ten punds, 40ᵈ less,” and that he gat.
Mr Thomas Mitchell said he had a good-brother that was there, and when he came hame he was asked what he gat. He answered, he saw it in dealling, but not a penny he gatt, but was threatened by the Bishop to be sent to Ireland.
Mr Simeon Johnstoun said—He was there, but gat no money; only went thither upon the Kings Letter.
The Moderatour said—That might weill be your rewaird.
Then diverse other of the brethren arose and declaired that there was both money taken and given at that last Assembly, and lykewayes they nominat sundrie that had receaved it. Then the reasons for the nullitie of the pretendit Assembly at Aberdein 1616 was red and proven to be valide.
The Reasons of the nullitie of Perth Assembly 1618 was red and fund valide, and Mr Laurence Kinneir told that his name was put out and uthers wer put in the rows.
Mr George Muschet said—Some that came with Commissions, because they trowed their voice would be negative, their names wer put out, and Mr John Murray offered three or foure tymes to speake the pretendit Moderatour, but gat not libertie; and when he came hame he said he never saw [such] ane ordour at ane Assembly.
Mr James Cunninghame said—The Bishop or pretendit Moderatour, in his discourse which he had be way of preaching, he was there labouring to cleare himselfe of any imputations which he said was layd on him for being the devyser of the 5 Articles. He tooke aff his hatt, which he had on all the tyme of the preatching, and attested God that he never knew of the 5 Articles till the King sent them doune, and commanded to ingrosse them in the Assembly; and Doctor Lindsay, who was the man that answered all the arguments, when it came to the voiting, said, “I confesse there is neither Scripture, antiquitie, nor reason for them;” and farder, he was heard say, “If either reason, Scripture, or antiquitie had place, he will tyne the cause.” The question was stated, whither, in respect of the Kings Commandment, the 5 Articles should pas or not in ane Act? And it was urged onlie to be acted in the Assembly bookes, and the Bishop said they should never be urgit with the practice of them; and the Bishop of Galloway, directing his speache to Mr James Carmichael, said, “Yow may see we conceaved the Act be way of Councell and not be way of Command,” and so, many gave way to the inserting of it in the booke for the Kings pleasure, who for conscience sake would never have practised them.