This Letter he carried to the King, and at the end of that Copy he retained, yet extant, His Majesty with his own hand wrote.
I have perused this Letter, and have not only permitted, but commanded that it should be sent.
Charles R.
Whitehall, 2 March,
1639 [40.]
1639 [40.]—March 8.
4. Letter from the Earl of Pembroke to Rothes.[249]
My Good Lord,
The Civilities and good Respects which I placed upon you, at the time of my being in the Camp, you stile Encouragements, and insinuate them as Reasons why you may expostulate with me. Your Premises I allow you, but your Inference I return you again, as fuller of Sophistry and mean Designs, than of Truth or Reason.
First, I never allowed your Defence lawfully undertaken, by other Arms than by Petitions and Prayers unto your Master. I never found Loyalty in your Covenant, nor Duty in your taking up Arms. I never affirmed the Justice of your Cause; neither did I consider so much the Merit thereof, as your unwarrantable and tumultuous disobedience therein unto the King, with the Vexation and Disturbance it brought upon the Nobility of this Kingdom. Neither was I in all this Commotion your Advocate for other reasons, than suffering my self to become a Mediator to his Majesty for your Peace and Forgiveness, moved thereunto by your frequent Protestations of paying all Duty and Loyalty to your Master’s Commands.
If from hence you haply gained from me an easier Credulity than your mask’d Designs deserved at my hands, I know not why you should obtrude on me an Alteration of my Opinion, or a withdrawing of my (but conditional) Respects from you. Thus far an Answer to what concerns me.