“I weighed exactly thirty-six grains of platina; I laid them on a sheet of white paper that I might observe them the better with a magnifying glass: I perceived three different substances; the first had the metallic lustre, and was the most abundant; the second, drawing a little on the black, very nearly resembled a ferruginous metallic matter, which could undergo a considerable degree of fire, such as the scoria of iron, vulgarly called machefer: the third less abundant than the two first, i. e. sand, where the yellow, or topaz colour, is the most predominant. Each grain of sand, considered separate, offered to the sight regular chrystals of different colours. I remarked some in an hexagon form, terminating in pyramids like rock chrystal; and this sand seems to be no other than a detritus of chrystal, or quartz of different colours.
“I resolved on separating, as exactly as possible, these different substances, by means of the loadstone, and to put aside the parts most attractable by the loadstone, from those which were less, and both from those which were not so at all; then to examine each substance particularly, and to submit them to different chemical and mechanical heats.
“I separated these parts of the platina which were briskly attracted at the distance of two or three lines; that is to say, without the contact of the loadstone; and for this experiment I made use of a good fictious magnet; I afterwards touched the metal with this magnet, and carried off all that would yield to the magnetical force. Being scarcely any longer attractable, I weighed what remained, and which I shall call No. 4; it was twenty-four grains; No. 1, which was the most sensible to the magnet, weighed four grains; No. 2 weighed the same; and No. 3, five grains
“No. 1, examined by the magnifying glass, presented only a mixture of metallic parts, a white sand bordering on the greyish, flat and round, or black vitriform sand, resembling pounded scoria, in which very rusty parts are perceptible: in short, such as the scoria of iron presents after having been exposed to moisture.
“No. 2 presented nearly the same, excepting that the metallic parts predominated, and that there were very few rusty particles.
“No. 3 was the same, but the metallic parts were more voluminous; they resembled melted metal which had been thrown into water to be granulated; they were flat, and of all sorts of figures, rounded on the corners.
“No. 4, which had not been carried off by the magnet (but some parts of which still afforded marks of sensibility to magnetism, when the magnet was moved under the paper where they were in), was a mixture of sand, metallic parts, and real scoria, friable between the fingers, and which blackened in the same manner as common scoria. The sand seemed to be composed of small rock, topaz, and cornelian chrystals. I broke some on a steel, and the powder was like varnish, reduced into powder; I did the same to the scoria; it broke with the greatest facility, and presented a black powder which blackened the paper like the common.
“The metallic parts of this last (No. 4) appeared more ductile under the hammer than those of No. 1, which made me imagine they contained less iron than the first: from whence it follows, that platina may possibly be no more than a mixture of iron and gold made by Nature, or perhaps by the hands of men.