TABLE 6.—WEIGHTS OF RATS FED RATION 6.—SANATOGEN, ARTIFICIAL PROTEIN-FREE MILK*

DateRat 14Rat 15Rat 16
Weight,
gm.
Gain or
Loss, gm.
Weight,
gm.
Gain or
Loss, gm.
Weight,
gm.
Gain or
Loss, gm.
3/9118.4.....111.3.....101.3.....
3/16126.2+7.8116.2+4.9100.0-1.3
3/23126.6+0.4123.4+7.2 98.0-2.0
3/30124.7-1.9123.3-0.1 98.7+0.7
4/6110.2-14.5112.3-11.0 88.7-10.0
4/13 95.3-14.9104.6-7.7 73.7-15.0
Total.....-23.1.....-6.7.....-27.6
4/20130.3+35.0135.3+30.7106.4+32.7
* Date 4/20 covers use of mixed food.
Chart 4.—Growth curves of Rats 11, 12 and 13, on Ration 5: Casein, artificial protein-free milk. Chart 5.—Growth curves of Rats 14, 15 and 16, on Ration 6: Sanatogen, artificial protein-free milk.

TABLE 7.—WEIGHT OF RATS 11 TO 16 COMPARED WITH
AVERAGE WEIGHT OF RAT OF SAME AGE

RatAge, DaysFinal Weight,
gm.
Average Weight
of Rat of
Same Age, gm.
11106112167
12106144167
13 99 90162
14106 95167
15 92105153
16 96 74158

That these losses in weight were not due to any inherent weakness in the rats is shown by the fact that by feeding Rats 11 to 16 for one week after the termination of the experiment with Osborne and Mendel’s “mixed food” (a mixture of dog bread, sunflower seeds, vegetables and meat) very large gains were secured in every instance, ranging from 14 to 35 gm.

The growth curves for Rats 7 to 16 are shown in Charts 3, 4 and 5.

To conclude, a comparative feeding of four male white rats during eleven weeks, showed, if anything, a slightly greater, but insignificant, increase in weight for Sanatogen over commercial casein. In a ration in which artificial had been substituted for natural protein-free milk, Sanatogen showed no advantage over commercial casein in checking the failure in weight of the rats.​—(From The Journal A. M. A., Nov. 21, 1914.)