[8-1] A Lecture on the Study of History, p. 1 (London, 1895).
[8-2] See his article “The Relation of Anthropology to the Study of History,” in The American Journal of Sociology, July, 1895.
[8-3] Ludwig Tobler, in his article “Zur Philosophie der Geschichte,” in the Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie, Bd. XII., s. 195.
[10-1] One of the most lucid of modern German philosophical writers says, “Without language, there could be no unity of mental life, no national life at all.” Friedrich Paulsen, Introduction to Philosophy, p. 193. (English translation, New York, 1895.) I need scarcely recall to the student that this was the cardinal principle of the ethnological writings of Wilhelm von Humboldt, and that his most celebrated essay is entitled “Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts.” The thought is well and tersely put by Prof. Frank Granger—“Language is the instinctive expression of national spirit.” (The Worship of the Romans, p. 19, London, 1896.)
[10-2] “Law, in its positive forms, may be viewed as an instrument used to produce a certain kind of character.” Frank Granger, ubi supra, p. 19.
[10-3] Lectures on the Science of Religion, p. 55.
[12-1] How different from the position of Voltaire, who, expressing, the general sentiment of his times, wrote,—“The history of barbarous nations has no more interest than that of bears and wolves!”
[13-1] Grundriss der ethnologischen Jurisprudenz, Bd. I., s. 5. (Leipzig, 1894.)
[13-2] “Das Geschichte ist weder eine Offenbarung Gottes, noch ein Naturprocess, sondern eben Menschenwerk.” Tobler in the Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie, Bd. XII., s. 201.
[14-1] History of the Philosophy of History, p. 579.