| Perihelion Passage. | Per. Dist. | Long. of Per. | |||
| 1. 1668, Feb. | 28d. | 13h. | 0.0047 | 277° | 2´ |
| 2. 1680, Dec. | 17 | 23 | 0.0062 | 262 | 49 |
| 3. 1843, Feb. | 27 | 9 | 0.0055 | 278 | 39 |
In Table II. all but the last have their perihelia in the same quadrant.
II. Comets whose Perihelion Distances are Greater than 0.01 and Less than 0.05.
| Perihelion Passage. | Per. Dist. | Long. of Per. | |||
| 1. 1689, Nov | 29d. | 4h. | 0.0189 | 269° | 41´ |
| 2. 1816, March | 1 | 8 | 0.0485 | 267 | 35 |
| 3. 1826, Nov | 18 | 9 | 0.0268 | 315 | 31 |
| 4. 1847, March | 30 | 6 | 0.0425 | 276 | 2 |
| 5. 1865, Jan | 14 | 7 | 0.0260 | 141 | 15 |
The perihelion of the first comet in Table III. is remote from the direction of the sun's motion; that of the second is distant but 14°, and of the third 21°.
III. Comets whose Perihelion Distances are Greater than 0.05 and Less than 0.1.
| Perihelion Passage. | Per. Dist. | Long. of Per. | |||
| 1. 1593, July | 18d. | 13h. | 0.0891 | 176° | 19´ |
| 2. 1780, Sept. | 30 | 22 | 0.0963 | 246 | 35 |
| 3. 1821, March | 21 | 12 | 0.0918 | 239 | 29 |
With greater perihelion distances the tendency of the perihelia to crowd together round the point indicated is less distinctly marked.
6. Few comets of small perihelion distance should have their perihelia in the vicinity of longitude 80°, the point opposite that towards which the sun is moving. Accordingly we find, by examining a table of cometary elements, that with a perihelion distance less than 0.1 there is not a single perihelion between 35° and 125°; between 0.1 and 0.2 but 3; and between 0.2 and 0.3 only 1.