Fig. 309. Nummulina antiquior, R. and V. (After V. von Möller.)
One striking difference, however, is apparent between the shell of Nautilus and the little nautiloid or rotaline shells of the Foraminifera: namely that the septa in these latter, and in all other {592} chambered Foraminifera, are convex outwards (Fig. [308]), whereas they are concave outwards in Nautilus (Fig. [304]) and in the rest of the chambered molluscan shells. The reason is perfectly simple. In both cases the curvature of the septum was determined before it became rigid, and at a time when it had the properties either of a fluid film or an elastic membrane. In both cases the actual curvature is determined by the tensions of the membrane and the pressures to which it was exposed. Now it is obvious that the extrinsic pressure which the tension of the membrane has to withstand is on opposite sides in the two cases. In Nautilus, the pressure to be resisted is that produced by the growing body of the animal, lying to the outer side of the septum, in the outer, wider portion of the tubular shell. In the Foraminifer the septum at the time of its formation was no septum at all; it was but a portion of the convex surface of a drop-that portion namely which afterwards became overlapped and enclosed by the succeeding drop; and the curvature of the septum is concave towards the pressure to be resisted, which latter is inside the septum, being simply the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid contents of the drop. The one septum is, speaking generally, the reverse of the other; the organism, so to speak, is outside the one and inside the other; and in both cases alike, the septum tends to assume the form of a surface of minimal area, as permitted, or as defined, by all the circumstances of the case.
The logarithmic spiral is easily recognisable in typical cases[544] (and especially where the spire makes more than one visible revolution about the pole), by its fundamental property of continued similarity: that is to say, by reason of the fact that the big many-chambered shell is of just the same shape as the smaller and younger shell—which phenomenon is apparent and even obvious in the nautiloid Foraminifera, as in Nautilus itself: but nevertheless the nature of the curve must be verified by careful measurement, just as Moseley determined or verified it in his {593} original study of nautilus (cf. p. [518]). This has accordingly been done, by various writers: and in the first instance by Valerian von Möller, in an elaborate study of Fusulina—a palaeozoic genus whose little shells have built up vast tracts of carboniferous limestone over great part of European Russia[545].
In this genus a growing surface of protoplasm may be conceived as wrapping round and round a small initial chamber, in such a way as to produce a fusiform or ellipsoidal shell—a transverse section of which reveals the close-wound spiral coil. The following are examples of measurements of the successive whorls in a couple of species of this genus.
| F. cylindrica, Fischer | F. Böcki, v. Möller | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breadth (in millimetres). | ||||
| Whorl | Observed | Calculated | Observed | Calculated |
| I | ·132 | — | ·079 | — |
| II | ·195 | ·198 | ·120 | ·119 |
| III | ·300 | ·297 | ·180 | ·179 |
| IV | ·449 | ·445 | ·264 | ·267 |
| V | — | — | ·396 | ·401 |
In both cases the successive whorls are very nearly in the ratio of 1 : 1·5; and on this ratio the calculated values are based.
Here is another of von Möller’s series of measurements of F. cylindrica, the measurements being those of opposite whorls—that is to say of whorls 180° apart:
| Breadth in mm. | ·096 | ·117 | ·144 | ·176 | ·216 | ·264 | ·323 | ·395 |
| Log. of mm. | ·982 | ·068 | ·158 | ·246 | ·334 | ·422 | ·509 | ·597 |
| Diff. of logs. | — | ·086 | ·090 | ·088 | ·088 | ·088 | ·087 | ·088 |
The mean logarithmic difference is here ·088, = log 1·225; or the mean difference of alternate logs (corresponding to a vector angle of 2π, i.e. to consecutive measurements along the same radius) is ·176, = log 1·5, the same value as before. And this ratio of 1·5 between the breadths of successive whorls corresponds (as we see by our table on p. [534]) to a constant angle of about {594} 86°, or just such a spiral as we commonly meet with in the Ammonites[546] (cf. p. [539]).