[22] According to De Wette, the copious draught of fishes was a symbolical miracle, typifying the rich fruits of the apostolic ministry. [↑]
[23] Porphyr. vita Pythagoræ, no. 25, ed. Kiessling; Jamblich. v. P. no. 36. ders. Ausg. It is fair to adduce this history, because, being less marvellous than the gospel narrative, it can hardly be an imitation, but must have arisen independently, and hence it evinces a common tendency of the ancient legend. [↑]
[24] [Luke v. 5]: δι’ ὅλης τῆς νυκτὸς κοπιάσαντες οὐδὲν ἐλάβομεν. [John xxi. 3]: καὶ ἐν ἐκείνῃ τῇ νυκτὶ ἐπίασαν ουδέν. [↑]
[25] Comp. de Wette, exeg Handb., 1, 3, s. 213. [↑]
[26] Vid. Kuinöl, in Matth., p. 255. [↑]
[27] Sieffert, ut sup. p. 55. [↑]
[28] Kuinöl, ut sup. Paulus, exeg. Handb., 1, b, s. 513. L. J., 1, a, 240. [↑]
[29] Bertholdt, Einleitung, 3, s. 1255 f. Fritzsche, s. 340. [↑]
[30] Sieffert, s. 56; De Wette, exeg. Handb., 1, 1, s. 91. [↑]