[283] Schneckenburger, über den Urspr., s. 68. [↑]
[284] See the examples in Wetstein, in loc. [↑]
[285] Die h. Schrift des n. Bundes, 1, s. 314, 2te Aufl. [↑]
[286] Paulus, ex. Handb. 2, 502 ff. Comp. Hase, L. J. § 111. [↑]
[287] Comp. Storr, in Flatt’s Magazin, 2, s. 68 ff. [↑]
[288] Kaiser, bibl. Theol. 1, s. 200. Comp. Hase, ut sup. [↑]
[289] Olshausen, 1, s. 512. This theologian, in the note on the same page, observes, that according to the words, We have taken no bread, [Matt. xvi. 7], the disciples, even after the second feeding, were not alive to the fact, that there was no necessity for providing themselves with food for the body in the neighbourhood of the Son of Man. But this instance is not to the point, for the circumstances are here altogether different. That from the miraculous feeding of the people when they were accidentally belated in the wilderness, the disciples did not draw the same convenient conclusion with the biblical commentator, can only redound to their honour. [↑]
[291] Gratz, Comm. z. Matth. 2, s. 90 f.; Sieffert, über den Ursprung, s. 97. [↑]
[292] Thiesz, Krit. Commentar, 1, s. 168 ff.; Schulz, über das Abendmahl, s. 311. Comp. Fritzsche, in Matth., p. 523. [↑]