255. He gives no account of quantity as such.
256. His account of the relation between Time and Number.
257. What does it come to?
258. Unites alone really exist: number a ‘fictitious denomination’. Yet ‘unites’ and ‘number’ are correlative; and the supposed fiction unaccountable.
259. Idea of time even more unaccountable on Hume’s principles.
260. His ostensible explanation of it.
261. It turns upon equivocation between feeling and conception of relations between felt things.
262. He fails to assign any impression or compound of impressions from which idea of time is copied.
263. How can he adjust the exact sciences to his theory of space and time?
264. In order to seem to do so, he must get rid of ‘Infinite Divisibility’.