9. No real object of human desire can ever be just as it appears.
10. Can Locke consistently allow the distinction between true happiness and false? Or responsibility?
11. Objections to the Utilitarian answer to these questions.
12. According to Locke present pleasures may be compared with future, and desire suspended till comparison has been made.
13. What is meant by ‘present’ and ‘future’ pleasure? By the supposed comparison Locke ought only to have meant the competition of pleasures equally present in imagination:
14…. and this could give no ground for responsibility. In order to do so, it must be understood as implying determination by conception of self.
15. Locke finds moral freedom in necessity of pursuing happiness.
16. If an action is moved by desire for an object, Locke asks no questions about origin of the object. But what is to be said of actions, which we only do because we ought?
17. Their object is pleasure, but pleasure given not by nature but by law.
18. Conformity to law not the moral good, but a means to it.