Contents
- [Preface.]
- [Introduction. Shakespearian Criticism in the Eighteenth Century.]
- [Nicholas Rowe: Some Account of the Life &c. of Mr. William Shakespear. 1709.]
- [John Dennis: On the Genius and Writings of Shakespeare. 1711.]
- [Alexander Pope: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1725.]
- [Lewis Theobald: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1733.]
- [Sir Thomas Hanmer: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1744.]
- [William Warburton: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1747.]
- [Samuel Johnson: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1765.]
- [Richard Farmer: An Essay on the Learning of Shakespeare: Addressed to Joseph Cradock, Esq. 1767.]
- [Maurice Morgann: An Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff. 1777.]
- [Notes.]
- [Nicholas Rowe.]
- [John Dennis.]
- [Alexander Pope.]
- [Lewis Theobald.]
- [Sir Thomas Hanmer.]
- [William Warburton.]
- [Samuel Johnson.]
- [Richard Farmer.]
- [Maurice Morgann.]
- [Index.]
- [Footnotes]
Preface.
The purpose of this book is to give an account of Shakespeare's reputation during the eighteenth century, and to suggest that there are grounds for reconsidering the common opinion that the century did not give him his due. The nine Essays or Prefaces here reprinted may claim to represent the chief phases of Shakespearian study from the days of Dryden to those of Coleridge. It is one of the evils following in the train of the romantic revival that the judgments of the older school have been discredited or forgotten. The present volume shows that the eighteenth century knew many things which the nineteenth has rediscovered for itself.
It is at least eighty years since most of these essays were reprinted. Rowe's Account of Shakespeare is given in its original and complete form for the first time, it is believed, since 1714; what was printed in the early Variorum editions, and previously in almost every edition since 1725, was Pope's version of Rowe's Account. Dennis's Essay has not appeared since the author republished it in 1721. In all cases the texts have been collated with the originals; and the more important changes in the editions published in the lifetime of the author are indicated in the Introduction or Notes.
The Introduction has been planned to show the main lines in the development of Shakespeare's reputation, and to prove that the new criticism, which is said to begin with Coleridge, takes its rise as early as the third quarter of the eighteenth century. On the question of Theobald's qualifications as an editor, it would appear that we must subscribe to the deliberate verdict of Johnson. We require strong evidence before we may disregard contemporary opinion, and in Theobald's case there is abundant evidence to confirm Johnson's view. Johnson's own edition, on the other hand, has not received justice during the last century.
It is a pleasure to the Editor to record his obligations to Professor Raleigh, Mr. Gregory Smith, and Mr. J. H. Lobban.