Fig. 131
Fig. 132
Here, in [Fig. 132], we have Shape-Harmony without Measure-Harmony. It might be argued that we have in this case an illustration of Shape-Balance without Measure-Balance. Theoretically that is so, but Shape-Balance without Measure-Balance is never satisfactory. If we want the lines in [Fig. 132] to balance we must find the balance-center between them, and then indicate that center by a symmetrical inclosure. We shall then have a Measure-Balance (occult) without Shape-Balance.
99. When measures correspond but shapes differ the balance-center may be suggested by a symmetrical inclosure or framing. When that is done the measures become balanced.
Fig. 133
Here we have Measure-Harmony and a Measure-Balance without Shape-Harmony or Shape-Balance. The two lines have different shapes but the same measures, lengths and widths corresponding. The balance-center is found for each line. See [pp. 54, 55]. Between the two centers is found the center, upon which the two lines will balance. This center is then suggested by a symmetrical inclosure. The balancing measures in such cases may, of course, be turned upon their centers, and the axis connecting their centers may be turned in any direction or attitude, with no loss of equilibrium, so far as the measures are concerned.
Fig. 134