ETA 32: Sex
MDT considers that there is no principial difference between male and female brains. The differences appear only related to the technological implementation of the beings, in general.
From the general theory we know that one of the basic design requirements of the beings is to survive unconditionally forever. This requirement is the goal of several image models of the PSM. In the technological implementation known, the living beings have a limited lifetime and the above condition is completed by reproduction.
Fulfilling in optimal conditions the reproduction in the animal world means the selection of the best individuals for reproduction and blocking the reproduction of the less performant, based on the available image models in PSM.
The models associated to sexual activities are in PSM and, of course, they are image models.
In case of humans, we remember that image models have dominated life until about year 1800, after which symbolic models have begun a strong ascension. As a consequence, sexuality, up to 1800, was based exclusively on image models (for the average person only), while after 1800, sexuality was influenced, more and more, by symbolic models (based on logical analysis).
For humans, as based initially on image models, sexuality modelled the man very differently from woman.
It should be noted here that the term "Man" means for the majority of us "a man" (male), which is not correct. The explanation for this confusion resides in the dominant position of the man in a society based on image models.
Reluctantly leaving behind the cultural environment based on image models, present sexual life is strongly influenced by symbolic models. In a symbolic model environment, there is no sexual difference. This could be expressed by saying that, in a symbolic society, there are no discriminations based on sex. All humans, independent of being male or female are equal, because this results from the analysis on symbolic model.
As already said, sexuality is associated with image models, and changing the structure of basic models, from image to symbolic, has produced strong perturbations in the approach to sex.